Libc++ has no separate C++98 support, it uses C++03 instead. This
removes some obsolete c++98 markers in the test.
Thanks to @StephanTLavavej for spotting this.
This patch adds a configuration of the libc++ test suite that enables
optimizations when building the tests. It also adds a new CI
configuration to exercise this on a regular basis. This is added in the
context of [1], which requires building with optimizations in order to
hit the bug.
[1]: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/68552
Found while running libc++'s tests with MSVC's STL.
*
`libcxx/test/std/algorithms/alg.sorting/alg.heap.operations/sort.heap/ranges_sort_heap.pass.cpp`
+ Fix Clang `-Wunused-variable`, because `LIBCPP_ASSERT` expands to
nothing for MSVC's STL.
+ This is the same "always void-cast" change that #73437 applied to the
neighboring `complexity.pass.cpp`. I missed that
`ranges_sort_heap.pass.cpp` was also affected because we had disabled
this test.
*
`libcxx/test/std/input.output/file.streams/fstreams/ifstream.members/buffered_reads.pass.cpp`
*
`libcxx/test/std/input.output/file.streams/fstreams/ofstream.members/buffered_writes.pass.cpp`
+ Fix MSVC "warning C4244: '`=`': conversion from '`__int64`' to
'`_Ty`', possible loss of data".
+ This is a valid warning, possibly the best one that MSVC found in this
entire saga. We're accumulating a `std::vector<std::streamsize>` and
storing the result in `std::streamsize total_size` but we actually have
to start with `std::streamsize{0}` or we'll truncate.
*
`libcxx/test/std/input.output/filesystems/fs.enum/enum.path.format.pass.cpp`
+ Fix Clang `-Wunused-local-typedef` because the following usage is
libc++-only.
+ I'm just expanding it at the point of use, and using the dedicated
`LIBCPP_STATIC_ASSERT` to keep the line length down.
*
`libcxx/test/std/input.output/syncstream/syncbuf/syncstream.syncbuf.assign/swap.pass.cpp`
+ Fix MSVC "warning C4242: 'argument': conversion from '`int`' to
'`const _Elem`', possible loss of data".
+ This is a valid warning (possibly the second-best) as `sputc()`
returns `int_type`. If `sputc()` returns something unexpected, we want
to know, so we should separately say `expected.push_back(CharT('B'))`.
*
`libcxx/test/std/language.support/support.dynamic/new.delete/new.delete.single/new.size_align_nothrow.pass.cpp`
*
`libcxx/test/std/language.support/support.dynamic/new.delete/new.delete.single/new.size_nothrow.pass.cpp`
+ Fix MSVC "warning C6001: Using uninitialized memory '`x`'."
+ [N4964](https://wg21.link/N4964) \[new.delete.single\]/12:
> *Effects:* The deallocation functions
(\[basic.stc.dynamic.deallocation\]) called by a *delete-expression*
(\[expr.delete\]) to render the value of `ptr` invalid.
+ \[basic.stc.general\]/4:
> When the end of the duration of a region of storage is reached, the
values of all pointers representing the address of any part of that
region of storage become invalid pointer values (\[basic.compound\]).
Indirection through an invalid pointer value and passing an invalid
pointer value to a deallocation function have undefined behavior. Any
other use of an invalid pointer value has implementation-defined
behavior.
+ In certain configurations, after `delete x;` MSVC will consider `x` to
be radioactive (and in other configurations, it'll physically null out
`x` as a safety measure). We can copy it into `old_x` before deletion,
which the implementation finds acceptable.
*
`libcxx/test/std/ranges/range.adaptors/range.elements/general.pass.cpp`
*
`libcxx/test/std/ranges/range.adaptors/range.elements/iterator/deref.pass.cpp`
+ Fix MSVC "warning C4242: 'initializing': conversion from '`_Ty`' to
'`_Ty`', possible loss of data".
+ This was being emitted in `pair` and `tuple`'s perfect forwarding
constructors. Passing `short{1}` allows MSVC to see that no truncation
is happening.
*
`libcxx/test/std/ranges/range.adaptors/range.elements/iterator/member_types.compile.pass.cpp`
+ Fix MSVC "warning C4242: 'initializing': conversion from '`_Ty`' to
'`_Ty2`', possible loss of data".
+ Similarly, this was being emitted in `pair`'s perfect forwarding
constructor. After passing `short{1}`, I reduced repetition by relying
on CTAD. (I can undo that cleanup if it's stylistically undesirable.)
*
`libcxx/test/std/utilities/function.objects/refwrap/refwrap.const/type_conv_ctor.pass.cpp`
+ Fix MSVC "warning C4930: '`std::reference_wrapper<int> purr(void)`':
prototyped function not called (was a variable definition intended?)".
+ There's no reason for `purr()` to be locally declared (aside from
isolating it to a narrow scope, which has minimal benefits); it can be
declared like `meow()` above. 😸
*
`libcxx/test/std/utilities/memory/util.smartptr/util.smartptr.shared/util.smartptr.shared.create/make_shared_for_overwrite.pass.cpp`
*
`libcxx/test/std/utilities/smartptr/unique.ptr/unique.ptr.create/make_unique_for_overwrite.default_init.pass.cpp`
+ Fix MSVC static analysis warnings when replacing `operator new`:
```
warning C28196: The requirement that '(_Param_(1)>0)?(return!=0):(1)' is
not satisfied. (The expression does not evaluate to true.)
warning C6387: 'return' could be '0': this does not adhere to the
specification for the function 'new'.
warning C6011: Dereferencing NULL pointer 'reinterpret_cast<char
*>ptr+i'.
```
+ All we need is a null check, which appears in other `operator new`
replacements:
b85f1f9b18/libcxx/test/std/language.support/support.dynamic/new.delete/new.delete.single/new.size.replace.pass.cpp (L27-L28)
In preparation for running clang-format on the whole code base, we are
also removing mentions of the legacy _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY macro in
favor of the newer _LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI.
We're still leaving the definition of _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY to avoid
creating needless breakage in case some older patches are checked-in
with mentions of the old macro. After we branch for LLVM 18, we can do
another pass to clean up remaining uses of the macro that might have
gotten introduced by mistake (if any) and remove the macro itself at the
same time. This is just a minor convenience to smooth out the transition
as much as possible.
See
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-clang-formatting-all-of-libc-once-and-for-all
for the clang-format proposal.
Found while running libc++'s test suite with MSVC's STL.
This is structured into a series of commits for easier reviewing; I
could also split this into smaller PRs if desired.
* Add void-casts for `invoke_r` calls to fix MSVC STL `[[nodiscard]]`
warnings.
+ Our rationale is that if someone is calling `invoke_r<NonVoidType>`,
it sure looks like they care about the return value.
* Add `[[maybe_unused]]` to silence `-Wunused-parameter` warnings.
+ This happens because the parameters are used within `LIBCPP_ASSERT`,
which vanishes for MSVC's STL. This also motivates the following
changes.
* Add `[[maybe_unused]]` to fix `-Wunused-variable` warnings.
* Always void-cast `debug_comparisons` to fix `-Wunused-variable`
warnings.
+ As this was already unused with a void-cast in one
`_LIBCPP_HARDENING_MODE` branch, I'm simply lifting it next to the
variable definition.
* Add `[[maybe_unused]]` to fix `-Wunused-local-typedef` warnings.
Since LLVM 17 has been branched and is on the verge of being released,
we can drop the CI job that tests against Clang 15. I think the number
of cherry-picks to `release/17.x` will be a lot smaller now, so keeping
a Clang 15 job around for that purpose seems unnecessary.
As a fly-by, this patch also removes some Clang 15 workarounds and test
suite annotations as we usually do. It also removes some slightly older
gcc test suite annotations that were missed.
AppleClang 15 was released on September 18th and is now stable. Per our
policy, we're bumping the supported AppleClang compiler to the latest
release. This allows cleaning up the test suite, but most importantly
unblocking various other patches that are blocked on bumping the
compiler requirements.
When LLVM is built under MSVC and libcxx ABI is set to 2, the
'copy_move.pass' test will unexpectedly pass. This patch mitigate
this issue by setting this test will only expecting FAIL when libcxx
ABI version is set to 1.
This is a re-land of be9f55f4fff47badcdca17be5bcc0a4a15894739
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D155760
Fixes: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/63442
This reverts commit be9f55f4fff47badcdca17be5bcc0a4a15894739.
The commit was both not approved by the libc++ review group, and also
the only change it contained was incorrect.
When LLVM is built under MSVC and libcxx ABI is set to 2, the
'copy_move.pass' test will unexpectedly pass. This patch mitigate this
issue by setting this test will only expecting FAIL when libcxx ABI
version is set to 1.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D155760
Fixes: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/63442
std::bind is supposed to be constexpr-friendly since C++20 and it was
marked as such in our synopsis. However, the tests were not actually
testing any of it and as it happens, std::bind was not really constexpr
friendly. This fixes the issue and makes sure that at least some of the
tests are running in constexpr mode.
Some tests for std::bind check functions that return void, and those
use global variables. These tests haven't been made constexpr-friendly,
however the coverage added by this patch should be sufficient to get
decent confidence.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D149295
In D145589, we made the std::bind placeholders inline constexpr to
satisfy C++17. It turns out that this causes ODR violations since the
shared library provides strong definitions for those placeholders, and
the linker on Windows actually complains about this.
Fortunately, C++17 only encourages implementations to use `inline constexpr`,
it doesn't force them. So instead, we unconditionally define the placeholders
as `extern const`, which avoids the ODR violation and is indistinguishable
from `inline constexpr` for most purposes, since the placeholders are
empty types anyway.
Note that we could also go back to the pre-D145589 state of defining them
as non-inline constexpr variables in C++17, however that is definitely
non-conforming since that means the placeholders have different addresses
in different TUs. This is all a bit pedantic, but all in all I feel that
`extern const` provides the best bang for our buck, and I can't really
find any downsides to that solution.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D149292
This has been done using the following command
find libcxx/test -type f -exec perl -pi -e 's|^([^/]+?)((?<!::)(?<!::u)u?intmax_t)|\1std::\2|' \{} \;
The std module doesn't export declarations in the global namespaace.
This is a preparation for that module.
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D146821
This has been done using the following command
find libcxx/test -type f -exec perl -pi -e 's|^([^/]+?)((?<!::)(?<!::u)u?intptr_t)|\1std::\2|' \{} \;
The std module doesn't export declarations in the global namespaace.
This is a preparation for that module.
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D146643
This has been done using the following command
find libcxx/test -type f -exec perl -pi -e 's|^([^/]+?)((?<!::)size_t)|\1std::\2|' \{} \;
And manually removed some false positives in std/depr/depr.c.headers.
The `std` module doesn't export `::size_t`, this is a preparation for that module.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc, EricWF, philnik
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D146088
We pretty consistently don't define those cause they are not needed,
and it removes the potential pitfall to think that these tests are
being run. This doesn't touch .compile.fail.cpp tests since those
should be replaced by .verify.cpp tests anyway, and there would be
a lot to fix up.
As a fly-by, I also fixed a bit of formatting, removed a few unused
includes and made some very minor, clearly NFC refactorings such as
in allocator.traits/allocator.traits.members/allocate.verify.cpp where
the old test basically made no sense the way it was written.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D146236
This has been done using the following command
find libcxx/test -type f -exec perl -pi -e 's|^([^/]+?)((?<!::)(?<!::u)u?int(_[a-z]+)?[0-9]{1,2}_t)|\1std::\2|' \{} \;
And manually removed some false positives in std/depr/depr.c.headers.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D145880
The module std does not provide c-types in the global namespace. This
means all these types need to be fully qualified. This is a first step
to convert them by using sed.
Since this is an automated conversion other types like uint64_t are kept
as is.
Note that tests in the directory libcxx/test/std/depr/depr.c.headers
should not be converted automatically. This requires manual attention,
there some test require testing uint32_t in the global namespace. These
test should fail when using the std module, and pass when using the
std.compat module.
A similar issue occurs with atomic, atomic_uint32_t is specified as
using atomic_uint32_t = atomic<uint32_t>; // freestanding
So here too we need to keep the name in the global namespace in the
tests.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D145520
`is_placeholder`, despite having an "is_" name, actually returns an int:
1 for `_1`, 2 for `_2`, 3 for `_3`, and so on. But it should still be int,
not size_t.
LWG3764 reference_wrapper::operator() should propagate noexcept
As drive-by adds constexpr to the synopsis, since it has already been
implemented.
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D142814
Some of those .compile.fail.cpp tests had become incorrect and they
were not testing anything. In general, .compile.fail.cpp tests are
bad because they make it way too easy to write garbage tests. Indeed,
the test could fail to compile due to any reason whatsoever (even a
typo) and it would appear to work correctly.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D138731
We've said that we'll remove `std::function` from C++03 in LLVM 16, so we might as well do it now before we forget.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc, Mordante
Spies: jloser, Mordante, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D135868
There are a handful of standard library types that are intended
to support CTAD but don't need any explicit deduction guides to
do so.
This patch adds a dummy deduction guide to those types to suppress
-Wctad-maybe-unsupported (which gets emitted in user code).
This is a re-application of the original patch by Eric Fiselier in
fcd549a7d828 which had been reverted due to reasons lost at this point.
I also added the macro to a few more types. Reviving this patch was
prompted by the discussion on https://llvm.org/D133425.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D133535
compressed_pair is widely used in the library, but most of the uses don't use the tuple parts. To avoid including <tuple> everywhere, use the forward declaration instead in compressed_pair.h
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Spies: libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D133331
This patch rewords the static assert diagnostic output. Failing a
_Static_assert in C should not report that static_assert failed. This
changes the wording to be more like GCC and uses "static assertion"
when possible instead of hard coding the name. This also changes some
instances of 'static_assert' to instead be based on the token in the
source code.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129048
Looks like we again are going to have problems with libcxx tests that
are overly specific in their dependency on clang's diagnostics.
This reverts commit 6542cb55a3eb115b1c3592514590a19987ffc498.
This patch is basically the rewording of the static assert statement's
output(error) on screen after failing. Failing a _Static_assert in C
should not report that static_assert failed. It’d probably be better to
reword the diagnostic to be more like GCC and say “static assertion”
failed in both C and C++.
consider a c file having code
_Static_assert(0, "oh no!");
In clang the output is like:
<source>:1:1: error: static_assert failed: oh no!
_Static_assert(0, "oh no!");
^ ~
1 error generated.
Compiler returned: 1
Thus here the "static_assert" is not much good, it will be better to
reword it to the "static assertion failed" to more generic. as the gcc
prints as:
<source>:1:1: error: static assertion failed: "oh no!"
1 | _Static_assert(0, "oh no!");
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Compiler returned: 1
The above can also be seen here. This patch is about rewording
the static_assert to static assertion.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129048
`std::function` has been deprecated for a few releases now. Remove it with an option to opt-back-in with a note that this option will be removed in LLVM 16.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Spies: #libc_vendors, EricWF, jloser, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127908
This mostly copys the `<experimental/functional>` stuff and updates the code to current libc++ style.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Spies: nlopes, adamdebreceni, arichardson, libcxx-commits, mgorny
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121074
This test only fails on x86_64 clang-cl, not for i386.
(The root cause is still not explored, thus the FIXME is still
relevant.)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124994
All supported compilers that support C++20 now support concepts. So, remove
`_LIB_LIBCPP_HAS_NO_CONCEPTS` in favor of `_LIBCPP_STD_VER > 17`. Similarly in
the tests, remove `// UNSUPPORTED: libcpp-no-concepts`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121528
