- Rename getATOMIC to getSYNC, as llvm will soon be able to emit both
'__sync' libcalls and '__atomic' libcalls, and this function is for
the '__sync' ones.
- getInsertFencesForAtomic() has been replaced with
shouldInsertFencesForAtomic(Instruction), so that the decision can be
made per-instruction. This functionality will be used soon.
- emitLeadingFence/emitTrailingFence are no longer called if
shouldInsertFencesForAtomic returns false, and thus don't need to
check the condition themselves.
llvm-svn: 263665
SelectionDAGBuilder::populateCallLoweringInfo is now used instead of
SelectionDAGBuilder::lowerCallOperands. The populateCallLoweringInfo
interface is more composable in face of design changes like
http://reviews.llvm.org/D18106
llvm-svn: 263663
Instead of running an explicit loop over `gc.relocate` calls hanging off
of a `gc.statepoint`, assert the validity of the type of the value being
relocated in `visitRelocate`.
llvm-svn: 263516
Improve vector extension of vectors on hardware without dedicated VSEXT/VZEXT instructions.
We already convert these to SIGN_EXTEND_VECTOR_INREG/ZERO_EXTEND_VECTOR_INREG but can further improve this by using the legalizer instead of prematurely splitting into legal vectors in the combine as this only properly helps for lowering to VSEXT/VZEXT.
Removes a lot of unnecessary any_extend + mask pattern - (Fix for PR25718).
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17932
llvm-svn: 263303
Generalise the existing SIGN_EXTEND to SIGN_EXTEND_VECTOR_INREG combine to support zero extension as well and get rid of a lot of unnecessary ANY_EXTEND + mask patterns.
Reapplied with a fix for PR26870 (avoid premature use of TargetConstant in ZERO_EXTEND_VECTOR_INREG expansion).
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17691
llvm-svn: 263159
Summary:
The code in SelectionDAG did not handle the case where the
register type and output types were different, but had the same size.
Reviewers: arsenm, echristo
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17940
llvm-svn: 263022
This re-applies r262886 with a fix for 32 bit platforms that have 8 byte
pointer alignment, effectively reverting r262892.
Original Message:
Currently some SDNode operands are malloc'd, some are stored inline in
subclasses of SDNode, and some are thrown into a BumpPtrAllocator.
This scheme is complex, inconsistent, and makes refactoring SDNodes
fairly difficult.
Instead, we can allocate all of the operands using an ArrayRecycler
that wraps a BumpPtrAllocator. This keeps the cache locality when
iterating operands, improves locality when iterating SDNodes without
looking at operands, and vastly simplifies the ownership semantics.
It also means we stop overallocating SDNodes by 2-3x and will make it
simpler to fix the rampant undefined behaviour we have in how we
mutate SDNodes from one kind to another (See llvm.org/pr26808).
This is NFC other than the changes in memory behaviour, and I ran some
LNT tests to make sure this didn't hurt compile time. Not many tests
changed: there were a couple of 1-2% regressions reported, but there
were more improvements (of up to 4%) than regressions.
llvm-svn: 262902
Looks like the largest SDNode is different between 32 and 64 bit now,
so this is breaking 32 bit bots. Reverting while I figure out a fix.
This reverts r262886.
llvm-svn: 262892
Currently some SDNode operands are malloc'd, some are stored inline in
subclasses of SDNode, and some are thrown into a BumpPtrAllocator.
This scheme is complex, inconsistent, and makes refactoring SDNodes
fairly difficult.
Instead, we can allocate all of the operands using an ArrayRecycler
that wraps a BumpPtrAllocator. This keeps the cache locality when
iterating operands, improves locality when iterating SDNodes without
looking at operands, and vastly simplifies the ownership semantics.
It also means we stop overallocating SDNodes by 2-3x and will make it
simpler to fix the rampant undefined behaviour we have in how we
mutate SDNodes from one kind to another (See llvm.org/pr26808).
This is NFC other than the changes in memory behaviour, and I ran some
LNT tests to make sure this didn't hurt compile time. Not many tests
changed: there were a couple of 1-2% regressions reported, but there
were more improvements (of up to 4%) than regressions.
llvm-svn: 262886
The divrem combine assumed the type of the div/rem is simple, which isn't
necessarily true. This probably worked fine until r250825, since it only
saw legal types, but now breaks when it runs as a pre-type-legalization
combine.
This fixes PR26835.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17878
llvm-svn: 262746
When div+rem calls on the same arguments are found, the ARM back-end merges the
two calls into one __aeabi_divmod call for up to 32-bits values. However,
for 64-bit values, which also have a lib call (__aeabi_ldivmod), it wasn't
merging the calls, and thus calling ldivmod twice and spilling the temporary
results, which generated pretty bad code.
This patch legalises 64-bit lib calls for divmod, so that now all the spilling
and the second call are gone. It also relaxes the DivRem combiner a bit on the
legal type check, since it was already checking for isLegalOrCustom on every
value, so the extra check for isTypeLegal was redundant.
Second attempt, creating TLI.isOperationCustom like isOperationExpand, to make
sure we only emit valid types or the ones that were explicitly marked as custom.
Now, passing check-all and test-suite on x86, ARM and AArch64.
This patch fixes PR17193 (and a long time FIXME in the tests).
llvm-svn: 262738
Generalise the existing SIGN_EXTEND to SIGN_EXTEND_VECTOR_INREG combine to support zero extension as well and get rid of a lot of unnecessary ANY_EXTEND + mask patterns.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17691
llvm-svn: 262599
Catch objects with a displacement of zero do not initialize a catch
object. The displacement is relative to %rsp at the end of the
function's prologue for x86_64 targets.
If we place an object at the top-of-stack, we will end up wit a
displacement of zero resulting in our catch object remaining
uninitialized.
Address this by creating our catch objects as fixed objects. We will
ensure that the UnwindHelp object is created after the catch objects so
that no catch object will have a displacement of zero.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17823
llvm-svn: 262546
When div+rem calls on the same arguments are found, the ARM back-end merges the
two calls into one __aeabi_divmod call for up to 32-bits values. However,
for 64-bit values, which also have a lib call (__aeabi_ldivmod), it wasn't
merging the calls, and thus calling ldivmod twice and spilling the temporary
results, which generated pretty bad code.
This patch legalises 64-bit lib calls for divmod, so that now all the spilling
and the second call are gone. It also relaxes the DivRem combiner a bit on the
legal type check, since it was already checking for isLegalOrCustom on every
value, so the extra check for isTypeLegal was redundant.
This patch fixes PR17193 (and a long time FIXME in the tests).
llvm-svn: 262507
The placement new calls here were all calling the allocation function
in RecyclingAllocator/Recycler for SDNode, instead of the function for
the specific subclass we were constructing.
Since this particular allocator always overallocates it more or less
worked, but would hide what we're actually doing from any memory
tools. Also, if you tried to change this allocator so something like a
BumpPtrAllocator or MallocAllocator, the compiler would crash horribly
all the time.
Part of llvm.org/PR26808.
llvm-svn: 262500
On AMDGPU where operations i64 operations are often bitcasted to v2i32
and back, this pattern shows up regularly where it breaks some
expected combines on i64, such as load width reducing.
This fixes some test failures in a future commit when i64 loads
are changed to promote.
llvm-svn: 262397
This reverts commit r262316.
It seems that my change breaks an out-of-tree chromium buildbot, so
I'm reverting this in order to investigate the situation further.
llvm-svn: 262387
Summary:
Calls sometimes need to be convergent. This is already handled at the
LLVM IR level, but it also needs to be handled at the MI level.
Ideally we'd propagate convergence from instructions, down through the
selection DAG, and into MIs. But this is Hard, and would affect
optimizations in the SDNs -- right now only SDNs with two operands have
any flags at all.
Instead, here's a much simpler hack: Add new opcodes for NVPTX for
convergent calls, and generate these when lowering convergent LLVM
calls.
Reviewers: jholewinski
Subscribers: jholewinski, chandlerc, joker.eph, jhen, tra, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17423
llvm-svn: 262373
Summary:
This patch modifies the existing comparison, branch, conditional-move
and select patterns, and adds new ones where needed. Also, the updated
SLT{u,i,iu} set of instructions generate a GPR width result.
The majority of the code changes in the Mips back-end fix the wrong
assumption that the result of SETCC nodes always produce an i32 value.
The changes in the common code path account for the fact that in 64-bit
MIPS targets, i1 is promoted to i32 instead of i64.
Reviewers: dsanders
Subscribers: dsanders, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10970
llvm-svn: 262316
In the case where op = add, y = base_ptr, and x = offset, this
transform:
(op y, (op x, c1)) -> (op (op x, y), c1)
breaks the canonical form of add by putting the base pointer in the
second operand and the offset in the first.
This fix is important for the R600 target, because for some address
spaces the base pointer and the offset are stored in separate register
classes. The old pattern caused the ISel code for matching addressing
modes to put the base pointer and offset in the wrong register classes,
which required no-trivial code transformations to fix.
llvm-svn: 262148
(This is the second attemp to commit this patch, after fixing pr26652 & pr26653).
This patch detects vector reductions before instruction selection. Vector
reductions are vectorized reduction operations, and for such operations we have
freedom to reorganize the elements of the result as long as the reduction of them
stay unchanged. This will enable some reduction pattern recognition during
instruction combine such as SAD/dot-product on X86. A flag is added to
SDNodeFlags to mark those vector reduction nodes to be checked during instruction
combine.
To detect those vector reductions, we search def-use chains starting from the
given instruction, and check if all uses fall into two categories:
1. Reduction with another vector.
2. Reduction on all elements.
in which 2 is detected by recognizing the pattern that the loop vectorizer
generates to reduce all elements in the vector outside of the loop, which
includes several ShuffleVector and one ExtractElement instructions.
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15250
llvm-svn: 261804
This is a part of the refactoring to unify isSafeToLoadUnconditionally and isDereferenceablePointer functions. In subsequent change I'm going to eliminate isDerferenceableAndAlignedPointer from Loads API, leaving isSafeToLoadSpecualtively the only function to check is load instruction can be speculated.
Reviewed By: hfinkel
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16180
llvm-svn: 261736
This was causing assertions later from using the wrong pointer
size with LDS operations. getOptimalMemOpType should also have
address space arguments later.
This avoids assertions in existing tests exposed by
a future commit.
llvm-svn: 261580
I missed == and != when I removed implicit conversions between iterators
and pointers in r252380 since they were defined outside ilist_iterator.
Since they depend on getNodePtrUnchecked(), they indirectly rely on UB.
This commit removes all uses of these operators. (I'll delete the
operators themselves in a separate commit so that it can be easily
reverted if necessary.)
There should be NFC here.
llvm-svn: 261498
Now that we don't always add an element to AllocatedStackSlots if we
don't find a pre-existing unallocated stack slot, bumping
StatepointMaxSlotsRequired to `NumSlots + 1` is not correct. Instead
bump the statistic near the push_back, to
Builder.FuncInfo.StatepointStackSlots.size().
llvm-svn: 261348
The check on MFI->getObjectSize() has to be on the FrameIndex, not on
the index of the FrameIndex in AllocatedStackSlots. Weirdly, the tests
I added in rL261336 didn't catch this.
llvm-svn: 261347
NFCI. They key motivation here is that I'd like to use
SmallBitVector::all() in a later change. Also, using a bit vector here
seemed better in general.
The only interesting change here is that in the failure case of
allocateStackSlot, we no longer (the equivalent of) push_back(true) to
AllocatedStackSlots. As far as I can tell, this is fine, since we'd
never re-use those slots in the same StatepointLoweringState instance.
Technically there was no need to change the operator[] type accesses to
set() and test(), but I thought it'd be nice to make it obvious that
we're using something other than a std::vector like thing.
llvm-svn: 261337
allocateStackSlot did not consider the size of the value to be spilled
before deciding to re-use a spill slot. This was originally okay (since
originally we'd only ever spill pointers), but it became not okay when
we changed our scheme to directly spill vectors of pointers.
While this change fixes the bug pointed out, it has two performance
caveats:
- It matches spill slot and spillee size exactly, while in theory we
can spill, e.g., an 8 byte pointer into a 16 byte slot. This is
slightly complicated to fix since in the stackmaps section, we report
the size of the spill slot as the size of the "indirect value"; and
if they're no longer equivalent, we'll have to keep track of the
(indirect) value size separately from the stack slot size.
- It will "spuriously run out" of reusable slots, since we now have an
second check in the search loop in addition to the availablity
check (e.g. you had two free scalar slots, and you first ask for a
vector slot followed by a scalar slot). I'll fix this in a later
commit.
llvm-svn: 261336
This removes the unusual loop structure in allocateStackSlot in favor of
something more straightforward. I've also removed the cautionary
comment in the function, which I suspect is historical cruft now, and
confuses more than it enlightens.
llvm-svn: 261335
This patch detects vector reductions before instruction selection. Vector
reductions are vectorized reduction operations, and for such operations we have
freedom to reorganize the elements of the result as long as the reduction of them
stay unchanged. This will enable some reduction pattern recognition during
instruction combine such as SAD/dot-product on X86. A flag is added to
SDNodeFlags to mark those vector reduction nodes to be checked during instruction
combine.
To detect those vector reductions, we search def-use chains starting from the
given instruction, and check if all uses fall into two categories:
1. Reduction with another vector.
2. Reduction on all elements.
in which 2 is detected by recognizing the pattern that the loop vectorizer
generates to reduce all elements in the vector outside of the loop, which
includes several ShuffleVector and one ExtractElement instructions.
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15250
llvm-svn: 261070
