We currenltly assert when want to diagnose a missing import and the decl
in question is already visible. It turns out that the decl in question
might be visible because another decl from the same module actually made
the module visible in a previous error diagnostic.
Remove the assertion and avoid re-exporting the module if it's already
visible.
rdar://problem/27975402
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32828
llvm-svn: 303705
C++14 added user-defined literal support for complex numbers so that you can
write something like "complex<double> val = 2i". However, there is an existing
GNU extension supporting this syntax and interpreting the result as a _Complex
type.
This changes parsing so that such literals are interpreted in terms of C++14's
operators if an overload is present but otherwise falls back to the original
GNU extension.
llvm-svn: 303694
remove the mechanism for doing so.
This mechanism was incorrect in the presence of preprocessed modules (and
#pragma clang module begin/end).
llvm-svn: 303469
inferring based on the current module at the point of creation.
This should result in no functional change except when building a preprocessed
module (or more generally when using #pragma clang module begin/end to switch
module in the middle of a file), in which case it allows us to correctly track
the owning module for declarations. We can't map from FileID to module in the
preprocessed module case, since all modules would have the same FileID.
There are still a couple of remaining places that try to infer a module from a
source location; I'll clean those up in follow-up changes.
llvm-svn: 303322
rather than waiting until it's queried.
Currently this is only applied to local submodule visibility mode, as we don't
yet allocate storage for the owning module in non-local-visibility modules
compilations.
This reinstates r302965, reverted in r303037, with a fix for the reported
crash, which occurred when reparenting a local declaration to be a child of
a hidden imported declaration (specifically during template instantiation).
llvm-svn: 303224
module immediately
Also revert dependent r302969. This is leading to crashes.
Will provide more details reproduction instructions to Richard.
llvm-svn: 303037
rather than waiting until it's queried.
Currently this is only applied to local submodule visibility mode, as we don't
yet allocate storage for the owning module in non-local-visibility modules
compilations.
llvm-svn: 302965
When we parse a redefinition of an entity for which we have a hidden existing
declaration, make it visible in the current module instead of mapping the
current source location to its containing module.
llvm-svn: 302842
type is a TemplateSpecializationType or InjectedClassNameType
Fixes PR30847. Partially fixes PR20973 (first position only).
PR17614 is still not working, its expression has the dependent
builtin type. We'll have to teach the completion engine how to "resolve"
dependent expressions to fix it.
rdar://29818301
llvm-svn: 302797
When looking for the template instantiation pattern of a templated entity,
consistently select the definition of the pattern if there is one. This means
we'll pick the same owning module when we start instantiating a template that
we'll later pick when determining which modules are visible during that
instantiation.
This reinstates r300650, reverted in r300659, with a fix for a regression
reported by Chandler after commit.
llvm-svn: 300938
modules but exposes much more widespread issues. Example and more
information is on the review thread for r300650.
Original commit summary:
[modules] Properly look up the owning module for an instantiation of a merged template.
llvm-svn: 300659
When looking for the template instantiation pattern of a templated entity,
consistently select the definition of the pattern if there is one. This means
we'll pick the same owning module when we start instantiating a template that
we'll later pick when determining which modules are visible during that
instantiation.
llvm-svn: 300650
such guides below explicit ones, and ensure that references to the class's
template parameters are not treated as forwarding references.
We make a few tweaks to the wording in the current standard:
1) The constructor parameter list is copied faithfully to the deduction guide,
without losing default arguments or a varargs ellipsis (which the standard
wording loses by omission).
2) If the class template declares no constructors, we add a T() -> T<...> guide
(which will only ever work if T has default arguments for all non-pack
template parameters).
3) If the class template declares nothing that looks like a copy or move
constructor, we add a T(T<...>) -> T<...> guide.
#2 and #3 follow from the "pretend we had a class type with these constructors"
philosophy for deduction guides.
llvm-svn: 295007
This patch changes how we handle argument-dependent `diagnose_if`
attributes. In particular, we now check them in the same place that we
check for things like passing NULL to Nonnull args, etc. This is
basically better in every way than how we were handling them before. :)
This fixes PR31638, PR31639, and PR31640.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28889
llvm-svn: 293360
This change adds a new type node, DeducedTemplateSpecializationType, to
represent a type template name that has been used as a type. This is modeled
around AutoType, and shares a common base class for representing a deduced
placeholder type.
We allow deduced class template types in a few more places than the standard
does: in conditions and for-range-declarators, and in new-type-ids. This is
consistent with GCC and with discussion on the core reflector. This patch
does not yet support deduced class template types being named in typename
specifiers.
llvm-svn: 293207
`diagnose_if` can be used to have clang emit either warnings or errors
for function calls that meet user-specified conditions. For example:
```
constexpr int foo(int a)
__attribute__((diagnose_if(a > 10, "configurations with a > 10 are "
"expensive.", "warning")));
int f1 = foo(9);
int f2 = foo(10); // warning: configuration with a > 10 are expensive.
int f3 = foo(f2);
```
It currently only emits diagnostics in cases where the condition is
guaranteed to always be true. So, the following code will emit no
warnings:
```
constexpr int bar(int a) {
foo(a);
return 0;
}
constexpr int i = bar(10);
```
We hope to support optionally emitting diagnostics for cases like that
(and emitting runtime checks) in the future.
Release notes will appear shortly. :)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27424
llvm-svn: 291418
This can be used to append alternative typo corrections to an existing diag.
include-fixer can use it to suggest includes to be added.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26745
llvm-svn: 287128
The exact same test guards entry into the loop in which this test
occurs, and there is nothing inside the loop that assigns to the
variable, so it has already been checked for null.
This was flagged by PVS-Studio as well, but the report is actually wrong
-- this is not a case where we dereference a variable prior to testing
it for null, this is a case where we have a redundant test for null
after we already performed the exact same test.
llvm-svn: 285983
In C mode, if we have a visible declaration but not a visible definition, a tag
defined in the declaration should be have a visible definition. In C++ we rely
on the ODR merging, whereas in C we cannot because each declaration of a
function gets its own set of declarations in its prototype scope.
Patch developed in collaboration with Richard Smith!
llvm-svn: 280984
we first touch any part of that module. Instead, defer them until the first
time that module is (transitively) imported. The initializer step for a module
then recursively initializes modules that its own headers imported.
For example, this avoids running the <iostream> global initializer in programs
that don't actually use iostreams, but do use other parts of the standard
library.
llvm-svn: 276159
This patch adds a __nth_element builtin that allows fetching the n-th type of a
parameter pack with very little compile-time overhead. The patch was inspired by
r252036 and r252115 by David Majnemer, which add a similar __make_integer_seq
builtin for efficiently creating a std::integer_sequence.
Reviewed as D15421. http://reviews.llvm.org/D15421
llvm-svn: 274316
Replace inheriting constructors implementation with new approach, voted into
C++ last year as a DR against C++11.
Instead of synthesizing a set of derived class constructors for each inherited
base class constructor, we make the constructors of the base class visible to
constructor lookup in the derived class, using the normal rules for
using-declarations.
For constructors, UsingShadowDecl now has a ConstructorUsingShadowDecl derived
class that tracks the requisite additional information. We create shadow
constructors (not found by name lookup) in the derived class to model the
actual initialization, and have a new expression node,
CXXInheritedCtorInitExpr, to model the initialization of a base class from such
a constructor. (This initialization is special because it performs real perfect
forwarding of arguments.)
In cases where argument forwarding is not possible (for inalloca calls,
variadic calls, and calls with callee parameter cleanup), the shadow inheriting
constructor is not emitted and instead we directly emit the initialization code
into the caller of the inherited constructor.
Note that this new model is not perfectly compatible with the old model in some
corner cases. In particular:
* if B inherits a private constructor from A, and C uses that constructor to
construct a B, then we previously required that A befriends B and B
befriends C, but the new rules require A to befriend C directly, and
* if a derived class has its own constructors (and so its implicit default
constructor is suppressed), it may still inherit a default constructor from
a base class
llvm-svn: 274049
This code should be an error:
void foo(int);
void f3() {
int foo(float);
{
float foo(int); // expected-error {{functions that differ only in their return type cannot be overloaded}}
}
}
the foo(float) function declared at function scope should not hide the float(int)
while trying to redeclare functions.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19763
llvm-svn: 272961
This is in preparation for C++ P0136R1, which switches the model for inheriting
constructors over from synthesizing a constructor to finding base class
constructors (via using shadow decls) when looking for derived class
constructors.
llvm-svn: 269231
This patch corresponds to reviews:
http://reviews.llvm.org/D15120http://reviews.llvm.org/D19125
It adds support for the __float128 keyword, literals and target feature to
enable it. Based on the latter of the two aforementioned reviews, this feature
is enabled on Linux on i386/X86 as well as SystemZ.
This is also the second attempt in commiting this feature. The first attempt
did not enable it on required platforms which caused failures when compiling
type_traits with -std=gnu++11.
If you see failures with compiling this header on your platform after this
commit, it is likely that your platform needs to have this feature enabled.
llvm-svn: 268898
declared before it is used. Because we don't use normal name lookup to find
these, the normal code to filter out non-visible names from name lookup results
does not apply.
llvm-svn: 268585
Since this patch provided support for the __float128 type but disabled it
on all platforms by default, some platforms can't compile type_traits with
-std=gnu++11 since there is a specialization with __float128.
This reverts the patch until D19125 is approved (i.e. we know which platforms
need this support enabled).
llvm-svn: 266460
This patch corresponds to review:
http://reviews.llvm.org/D15120
It adds support for the __float128 keyword, literals and a target feature to
enable it. This support is disabled by default on all targets and any target
that has support for this type is free to add it.
Based on feedback that I've received from target maintainers, this appears to
be the right thing for most targets. I have not heard from the maintainers of
X86 which I believe supports this type. I will subsequently investigate the
impact of enabling this on X86.
llvm-svn: 266186
Add parsing, sema analysis and serialization/deserialization for 'declare reduction' construct.
User-defined reductions are defined as
#pragma omp declare reduction( reduction-identifier : typename-list : combiner ) [initializer ( initializer-expr )]
These custom reductions may be used in 'reduction' clauses of OpenMP constructs. The combiner specifies how partial results can be combined into a single value. The
combiner can use the special variable identifiers omp_in and omp_out that are of the type of the variables being reduced with this reduction-identifier. Each of them will
denote one of the values to be combined before executing the combiner. It is assumed that the special omp_out identifier will refer to the storage that holds the resulting
combined value after executing the combiner.
As the initializer-expr value of a user-defined reduction is not known a priori the initializer-clause can be used to specify one. Then the contents of the initializer-clause
will be used as the initializer for private copies of reduction list items where the omp_priv identifier will refer to the storage to be initialized. The special identifier
omp_orig can also appear in the initializer-clause and it will refer to the storage of the original variable to be reduced.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11182
llvm-svn: 262582
If we import a module that has a complete array type and one that has an
incomplete array type, the declaration found by name lookup might be the one with
the incomplete type, possibly resulting in rejects-valid.
Now, the name lookup prefers decls with a complete array types. Also,
diagnose cases when the redecl chain has array bound, different from the merge
candidate.
Reviewed by Richard Smith.
llvm-svn: 262189
