`reverse_iterator` supports either c++20 `bidirectional_iterator` or
`Cpp17BidirectionalIterator `
http://eel.is/c++draft/reverse.iter.requirements
The current `reverse_iterator` uses `std::prev` in its `operator->`,
which only supports the `Cpp17BidirectionalIterator` properly.
If the underlying iterator is c++20 `bidirectional_iterator` but does
not satisfy the named requirement `Cpp17BidirectionalIterator`,
(examples are `zip_view::iterator`, `flat_map::iterator`), the current
`std::prev` silently compiles but does a no-op and returns the same
iterator back. So `reverse_iterator::operator->` will silently give a
wrong answer.
Even if we fix the behaviour of `std::prev`, at best, we could fail to
compile the code. But this is not ok, because we need to support this
kind of iterators in `reverse_iterator`.
The solution is simply to not use `std::prev`.
---------
Co-authored-by: Louis Dionne <ldionne.2@gmail.com>
As time went by, a few files have become mis-formatted w.r.t.
clang-format. This was made worse by the fact that formatting was not
being enforced in extensionless headers. This commit simply brings all
of libcxx/include in-line with clang-format again.
We might have to do this from time to time as we update our clang-format
version, but frankly this is really low effort now that we've formatted
everything once.
These headers have become very small by using compiler builtins, often
containing only two declarations. This merges these headers, since
there doesn't seem to be much of a benefit keeping them separate.
Specifically, `is_{,_nothrow,_trivially}{assignable,constructible}` are
kept and the `copy`, `move` and `default` versions of these type traits
are moved in to the respective headers.
This patch runs clang-format on all of libcxx/include and libcxx/src, in
accordance with the RFC discussed at [1]. Follow-up patches will format
the benchmarks, the test suite and remaining parts of the code. I'm
splitting this one into its own patch so the diff is a bit easier to
review.
This patch was generated with:
find libcxx/include libcxx/src -type f \
| grep -v 'module.modulemap.in' \
| grep -v 'CMakeLists.txt' \
| grep -v 'README.txt' \
| grep -v 'libcxx.imp' \
| grep -v '__config_site.in' \
| xargs clang-format -i
A Git merge driver is available in libcxx/utils/clang-format-merge-driver.sh
to help resolve merge and rebase issues across these formatting changes.
[1]: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-clang-formatting-all-of-libc-once-and-for-all
In preparation for running clang-format on the whole code base, we are
also removing mentions of the legacy _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY macro in
favor of the newer _LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI.
We're still leaving the definition of _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY to avoid
creating needless breakage in case some older patches are checked-in
with mentions of the old macro. After we branch for LLVM 18, we can do
another pass to clean up remaining uses of the macro that might have
gotten introduced by mistake (if any) and remove the macro itself at the
same time. This is just a minor convenience to smooth out the transition
as much as possible.
See
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-clang-formatting-all-of-libc-once-and-for-all
for the clang-format proposal.
We plan to add concepts for checking that iterators actually provide what they claim to. This is to avoid people thinking that these type traits actually check the iterator requirements in more detail.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Spies: Mordante, libcxx-commits, wenlei
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D150801
This change is almost fully mechanical. The only interesting change is in `generate_feature_test_macro_components.py` to generate `_LIBCPP_STD_VER >=` instead. To avoid churn in the git-blame this commit should be added to the `.git-blame-ignore-revs` once committed.
Reviewed By: ldionne, var-const, #libc
Spies: jloser, libcxx-commits, arichardson, arphaman, wenlei
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D143962
This has multiple benefits:
- The optimizations are also performed for the `ranges::` versions of the algorithms
- Code duplication is reduced
- it is simpler to add this optimization for other segmented iterators,
like `ranges::join_view::iterator`
- Algorithm code is removed from `<deque>`
Reviewed By: ldionne, huixie90, #libc
Spies: mstorsjo, sstefan1, EricWF, libcxx-commits, mgorny
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D132505
This reverts commit a6e1080b87db8fbe0e1afadd96af5a3c0bd5e279.
Fix the conditions when the `memmove` optimization can be applied and refactor them out into a reusable type trait, fix and significantly expand the tests.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D139235
While it's not necessary to qualify calls to `declval` it makes error messages very crypric if the declaration isn't reachable anymore
For example:
```
/home/nikolask/llvm-projects/libcxx/build/include/c++/v1/__chrono/duration.h:53:66: error: no type named 'type' in 'std::common_type<long, long>'
typedef chrono::duration<typename common_type<_Rep1, _Rep2>::type,
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~
/home/nikolask/llvm-projects/libcxx/build/include/c++/v1/__type_traits/common_type.h:107:14: note: in instantiation of template class 'std::common_type<std::chrono::duration<long, std::ratio<3600, 1>>, std::chrono::duration<long, std::ratio<3600, 1>>>' requested here
: public common_type<_Tp, _Tp> {};
^
/home/nikolask/llvm-projects/libcxx/build/include/c++/v1/__chrono/duration.h:279:58: note: in instantiation of template class 'std::common_type<std::chrono::duration<long, std::ratio<3600, 1>>>' requested here
_LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY _LIBCPP_CONSTEXPR typename common_type<duration>::type operator+() const {return typename common_type<duration>::type(*this);}
^
/home/nikolask/llvm-projects/libcxx/build/include/c++/v1/__chrono/duration.h:308:54: note: in instantiation of template class 'std::chrono::duration<long, std::ratio<3600, 1>>' requested here
typedef duration< int, ratio_multiply<ratio<24>, hours::period>> days;
^
/home/nikolask/llvm-projects/libcxx/build/include/c++/v1/__chrono/duration.h:280:81: error: no type named 'type' in 'std::common_type<std::chrono::duration<long, std::ratio<3600, 1>>>'
_LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY _LIBCPP_CONSTEXPR typename common_type<duration>::type operator-() const {return typename common_type<duration>::type(-__rep_);}
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~
/home/nikolask/llvm-projects/libcxx/build/include/c++/v1/__chrono/duration.h:308:54: note: in instantiation of template class 'std::chrono::duration<long, std::ratio<3600, 1>>' requested here
typedef duration< int, ratio_multiply<ratio<24>, hours::period>> days;
^
/home/nikolask/llvm-projects/libcxx/build/include/c++/v1/__chrono/duration.h:53:66: error: no type named 'type' in 'std::common_type<int, int>'
typedef chrono::duration<typename common_type<_Rep1, _Rep2>::type,
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~
/home/nikolask/llvm-projects/libcxx/build/include/c++/v1/__type_traits/common_type.h:107:14: note: in instantiation of template class 'std::common_type<std::chrono::duration<int, std::ratio<86400, 1>>, std::chrono::duration<int, std::ratio<86400, 1>>>' requested here
: public common_type<_Tp, _Tp> {};
^
/home/nikolask/llvm-projects/libcxx/build/include/c++/v1/__chrono/duration.h:279:58: note: in instantiation of template class 'std::common_type<std::chrono::duration<int, std::ratio<86400, 1>>>' requested here
_LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY _LIBCPP_CONSTEXPR typename common_type<duration>::type operator+() const {return typename common_type<duration>::type(*this);}
^
/home/nikolask/llvm-projects/libcxx/build/include/c++/v1/__chrono/duration.h:309:55: note: in instantiation of template class 'std::chrono::duration<int, std::ratio<86400, 1>>' requested here
typedef duration< int, ratio_multiply<ratio<7>, days::period>> weeks;
^
19 similar errors omitted
```
changes with qualification added to:
```
While building module 'std' imported from /home/nikolask/llvm-projects/libcxx/libcxx/test/std/utilities/meta/meta.trans/meta.trans.other/common_type.pass.cpp:13:
In file included from <module-includes>:17:
In file included from /home/nikolask/llvm-projects/libcxx/build/include/c++/v1/math.h:309:
In file included from /home/nikolask/llvm-projects/libcxx/build/include/c++/v1/limits:107:
In file included from /home/nikolask/llvm-projects/libcxx/build/include/c++/v1/type_traits:432:
In file included from /home/nikolask/llvm-projects/libcxx/build/include/c++/v1/__type_traits/common_reference.h:13:
/home/nikolask/llvm-projects/libcxx/build/include/c++/v1/__type_traits/common_type.h:28:43: error: declaration of 'declval' must be imported from module 'std.utility.__utility.declval' before it is required
using __cond_type = decltype(false ? std::declval<_Tp>() : std::declval<_Up>());
^
/home/nikolask/llvm-projects/libcxx/build/include/c++/v1/__utility/declval.h:30:34: note: declaration here is not visible
decltype(std::__declval<_Tp>(0)) declval() _NOEXCEPT;
^
/home/nikolask/llvm-projects/libcxx/libcxx/test/std/utilities/meta/meta.trans/meta.trans.other/common_type.pass.cpp:13:10: fatal error: could not build module 'std'
#include <functional>
~~~~~~~~^
2 errors generated.
```
Reviewed By: ldionne, Mordante, #libc
Spies: libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130854
Instead of using `reverse_iterator`, share the optimization between the 4 algorithms. The key observation here that `memmove` applies to both `copy` and `move` identically, and to their `_backward` versions very similarly. All algorithms now follow the same pattern along the lines of:
```
if constexpr (can_memmove<InIter, OutIter>) {
memmove(first, last, out);
} else {
naive_implementation(first, last, out);
}
```
A follow-up will delete `unconstrained_reverse_iterator`.
This patch removes duplication and divergence between `std::copy`, `std::move` and `std::move_backward`. It also improves testing:
- the test for whether the optimization is used only applied to `std::copy` and, more importantly, was essentially a no-op because it would still pass if the optimization was not used;
- there were no tests to make sure the optimization is not used when the effect would be visible.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130695
This was discussed on Discord with the consensus that we should rename the macros.
Reviewed By: ldionne, Mordante, var-const, avogelsgesang, jloser, #libc
Spies: libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131498
When we ship LLVM 16, <ranges> won't be considered experimental anymore.
We might as well do this sooner rather than later.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D132151
Also fix `ranges::stable_sort` and `ranges::inplace_merge` to support
proxy iterators now that their internal implementations can correctly
dispatch `rotate`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130758
This adds a C++20-version of `reverse_iterator` which doesn't SFINAE away the operators for use inside the classic STL algorithms. Pre-C++20 `_AlgRevIter` is just an alias for `reverse_iterator`.
Reviewed By: var-const, #libc
Spies: huixie90, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128864
Simplify the implementation of `std::copy` and `std::move` by using `__unwrap_iter` and `__rewrap_iter` to unwrap and rewrap `reverse_iterator<reverse_iterator<Iter>>` instead of specializing `__copy_impl` and `__move_impl`.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Spies: wenlei, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127049
Changes in [P0896](https://wg21.link/p0896):
- add `disable_sized_sentinel_for`;
- add `iter_move` and `iter_swap`;
- add a `requires` clause to the `operator->`;
- add `iterator_concept`;
- check that the `Iterator` template parameter is a bidirectional
iterator;
- add constraints to all comparison operators;
- change the definitions of `iterator_category`, `value_type`,
`difference_type` and `reference` (changes to `iterator_category` were
already implemented).
Also add a few forgotten things to the `reverse_iterator` synopsis
(notably the spaceship operator).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120180
All supported compilers that support C++20 now support concepts. So, remove
`_LIB_LIBCPP_HAS_NO_CONCEPTS` in favor of `_LIBCPP_STD_VER > 17`. Similarly in
the tests, remove `// UNSUPPORTED: libcpp-no-concepts`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121528
This commit reverts 5aaefa51 (and also partly 7f285f48e77 and b6d75682f9,
which were related to the original commit). As landed, 5aaefa51 had
unintended consequences on some downstream bots and didn't have proper
coverage upstream due to a few subtle things. Implementing this is
something we should do in libc++, however we'll first need to address
a few issues listed in https://reviews.llvm.org/D106124#3349710.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120683
libc++ has started splicing standard library headers into much more
fine-grained content for maintainability. It's very likely that outdated
and naive tooling (some of which is outside of LLVM's scope) will
suggest users include things such as <__ranges/access.h> instead of
<ranges>, and Hyrum's law suggests that users will eventually begin to
rely on this without the help of tooling. As such, this commit
intends to protect users from themselves, by making it a hard error for
anyone outside of the standard library to include libc++ detail headers.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106124
Per Discord discussion, we're normalizing on a simple `!defined(_LIBCPP_HAS_NO_CONCEPTS)`
so that we can do a big search-and-replace for `!defined(_LIBCPP_HAS_NO_CONCEPTS)`
back into `_LIBCPP_STD_VER > 17` when we're ready to abandon support for concept-syntax-less
compilers.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118748
This essentially reverts e02ed1c255d71 and puts in a new fix, which makes `path::iterator`
a true C++20 `bidirectional_iterator`, but downgrades it to an `input_iterator` in C++17.
Fixes#37852.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116489
The NFC part of D116809. We still want to enforce this in CI,
but the mechanism for that is still to-be-determined.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116809
This patch implements operator<=> for std::reverse_iterator and
also adds a test that checks that three-way comparison of different
instantiations of std::reverse_iterator works as expected (related to
D113417).
Reviewed By: ldionne, Quuxplusone, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113695
The template std::is_assignable<T, U> checks that T is assignable from
U. Hence, the order of operands in the instantiation of
std::is_assignable in the std::reverse_iterator::operator= condition
should be reversed.
This issue remained unnoticed because std::reverse_iterator has an
implicit conversion constructor. This patch adds a test to check that
the assignment operator is used directly, without any implicit
conversions. The patch also adds a similar test for
std::move_iterator.
Reviewed By: Quuxplusone, ldionne, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113417
In other places in the code, we use lowercase spelling for things that
are not available in prior standards.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109435
