Reapply after D156401, which stops PatternMatch from recognizing
binop constant expressions, which should avoid the infinite loops
and assertion failures this patch previously exposed.
-----
In preparation for removing support for and/or expressions, mark
them as undesirable. As such, we will no longer implicitly create
such expressions, but they still exist.
This was reverted together with another commit due to a test
conflict. Reapply without functional changes.
-----
When commuting the operands, don't create a constant expression
for undesirable binops. Only invoke the constant folding function
in that case.
This reverts commit 673a4671f3e8b7158d990f6456428175a6eac38c.
Depends on reverted commit 0cab8d20417c0e2ccc1ffc5505e080126f5de8e6.
That commit was reverted due to an LTO crash. I've put a reduced
test case here: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/64114
This reapplies the change for and, but also marks or as undesirable
at the same time. Only handling one of them can cause infinite
combine loops due to the asymmetric handling.
-----
In preparation for removing support for and/or expressions, mark
them as undesirable. As such, we will no longer implicitly create
such expressions, but they still exist.
This reverts commit 086ee99564afbb11449c08ea2e094f7f49fadde5.
This patch causes an infinite loop when building arch/mips/mm/c-r4k.c in
the Linux kernel. See the comment in Phabricator for a reduced
reproducer: https://reviews.llvm.org/rG086ee99564afbb11449c08ea2e094f7f49fadde5
Reapply after fixing an issue in canonicalizeLogicFirst() exposed
by this change (218f97578b26f7a89f7f8ed0748c31ef0181f80a).
-----
In preparation for removing support for and expressions, mark them
as undesirable. As such, we will no longer implicitly create such
expressions, but they still exist.
This reverts commit f8a36d8c3e264c4fccf8058e699201a452ea7bb7.
I believe this is causing an assertion failure on the
sanitizer-x86_64-linux buildbot:
clang++: /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux/build/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/Support/Casting.h:578: decltype(auto) llvm::cast(From *) [To = llvm::BinaryOperator, From = llvm::Value]: Assertion `isa<To>(Val) && "cast<Ty>() argument of incompatible type!"' failed.
#10 0x000055bdd7e82408 canonicalizeLogicFirst(llvm::BinaryOperator&, llvm::IRBuilder<llvm::TargetFolder, llvm::IRBuilderCallbackInserter>&) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux/build/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineAndOrXor.cpp:2131:5
#11 0x000055bdd7e80183 llvm::InstCombinerImpl::visitAnd(llvm::BinaryOperator&) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux/build/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineAndOrXor.cpp:2661:20
Likely the code is encountering a constant expression in a case it
didn't before.
In preparation for removing support for add expressions, mark them
as undesirable. As such, we will no longer implicitly create such
expressions, but they still exist.
Following the change in shufflevector semantics,
poison will be used to represent undefined elements in shufflevector masks.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D149256
Previously all indices into [0 x T] arrays were considered in
range, which resulted in us incorrectly inferring inbounds for
all GEPs of that form. We should not consider them in range here,
and instead bail out of the rewriting logic (which would divide
by zero).
Do continue to consider 0 always in range, to avoid changing
behavior for zero-index GEPs.
When inferring that a GEP of a global variable is inbounds because
there is no notional overindexing, we need to check that the
global value type and the GEP source element type match.
This was not necessary with typed pointers (because we would have
a bitcast in between), but is necessary with opaque pointers.
We should be able to recover some of the safe cases by performing
an offset based inbounds inference in DL-aware ConstantFolding.
This may cause GlobalSplit to fail if opaque pointers are used.
inrange really needs a new representation, but for now restore the
pre-opaque pointers status.
Use deduction guides instead of helper functions.
The only non-automatic changes have been:
1. ArrayRef(some_uint8_pointer, 0) needs to be changed into ArrayRef(some_uint8_pointer, (size_t)0) to avoid an ambiguous call with ArrayRef((uint8_t*), (uint8_t*))
2. CVSymbol sym(makeArrayRef(symStorage)); needed to be rewritten as CVSymbol sym{ArrayRef(symStorage)}; otherwise the compiler is confused and thinks we have a (bad) function prototype. There was a few similar situation across the codebase.
3. ADL doesn't seem to work the same for deduction-guides and functions, so at some point the llvm namespace must be explicitly stated.
4. The "reference mode" of makeArrayRef(ArrayRef<T> &) that acts as no-op is not supported (a constructor cannot achieve that).
Per reviewers' comment, some useless makeArrayRef have been removed in the process.
This is a follow-up to https://reviews.llvm.org/D140896 that introduced
the deduction guides.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D140955
This patch mechanically replaces None with std::nullopt where the
compiler would warn if None were deprecated. The intent is to reduce
the amount of manual work required in migrating from Optional to
std::optional.
This is part of an effort to migrate from llvm::Optional to
std::optional:
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/deprecating-llvm-optional-x-hasvalue-getvalue-getvalueor/63716
This removes creation of udiv/sdiv/urem/srem constant expressions,
in preparation for their removal. I've added a
ConstantExpr::isDesirableBinOp() predicate to determine whether
an expression should be created for a certain operator.
With this patch, div/rem expressions can still be created through
explicit IR/bitcode, forbidding them entirely will be the next step.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128820
This is in preparation for https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-remove-most-constant-expressions/63179.
As part of that change, we'll want to invoke some of these constant
folding APIs explicitly, as it won't happen as part of
ConstantExpr::getXYZ() anymore.
Ideally, we'd merge these with the DL-aware constant folding APIs
and only call those, but this is not easily possible for some
current usages (most important IRBuilder, which uses DL-independent
constant folding by default, and some major layering changes would
be needed to change that).
This is basically a reboot of D115035 with different motivation.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128213
Most of insertelement constant folding is blocked if the vector type
is scalable. I believe we can make an exception for inserting null
into an all zeros vector.
Reviewed By: nikic
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123413
With opaque pointers, we can eliminate zero-index GEPs even if
they have multiple indices, as this no longer impacts the result
type of the GEP.
This optimization is already done for instructions in InstSimplify,
but we were missing the corresponding constant expression handling.
The constexpr transform is a bit more powerful, because it can
produce a vector splat constant and also handles undef values --
it is an extension of an existing single-index transform.
Based on the output of include-what-you-use.
This is a big chunk of changes. It is very likely to break downstream code
unless they took a lot of care in avoiding hidden ehader dependencies, something
the LLVM codebase doesn't do that well :-/
I've tried to summarize the biggest change below:
- llvm/include/llvm-c/Core.h: no longer includes llvm-c/ErrorHandling.h
- llvm/IR/DIBuilder.h no longer includes llvm/IR/DebugInfo.h
- llvm/IR/IRBuilder.h no longer includes llvm/IR/IntrinsicInst.h
- llvm/IR/LLVMRemarkStreamer.h no longer includes llvm/Support/ToolOutputFile.h
- llvm/IR/LegacyPassManager.h no longer include llvm/Pass.h
- llvm/IR/Type.h no longer includes llvm/ADT/SmallPtrSet.h
- llvm/IR/PassManager.h no longer includes llvm/Pass.h nor llvm/Support/Debug.h
And the usual count of preprocessed lines:
$ clang++ -E -Iinclude -I../llvm/include ../llvm/lib/IR/*.cpp -std=c++14 -fno-rtti -fno-exceptions | wc -l
before: 6400831
after: 6189948
200k lines less to process is no that bad ;-)
Discourse thread on the topic: https://llvm.discourse.group/t/include-what-you-use-include-cleanup
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118652
Once again, this fold is meaningless with opaque pointers, as there
is no pointer element type to canonicalize. At some point, we may
want to do GEP type canonicalizations.
Instead use either Type::getPointerElementType() or
Type::getNonOpaquePointerElementType().
This is part of D117885, in preparation for deprecating the API.
This folded (null + X) == g to false, but of course this is
incorrect if X == g.
Possibly this got confused with the null == g case, which is
already handled elsewhere.
The fold for merging a GEP of GEP into a single GEP currently bails
if doing so would result in notional overindexing. The justification
given in the comment above this check is dangerously incorrect: GEPs
with notional overindexing are perfectly fine, and if some code
treats them incorrectly, then that code is broken, not the GEP.
Such a GEP might legally appear in source IR, so only preventing
its creation cannot be sufficient. (The constant folder also ends
up canonicalizing the GEP to remove the notional overindexing, but
that's neither here nor there.)
This check dates back to
bd4fef4a89,
and as far as I can tell the original issue this was trying to
patch around has since been resolved.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116587
This fold is not correct, because indices might evaluate to zero
even if they are not a literal zero integer. Additionally, this
fold would be wrong (in the general case) for non-i8 types as well,
due to index overflow.
Drop this fold and instead let the target-dependent constant
folder compute the actual offset and fold the comparison based
on that.
We can fold an equality or unsigned icmp between base+offset1 and
base+offset2 with inbounds offsets by comparing the offsets directly.
This replaces a pair of specialized folds that tried to reason
based on the GEP structure instead. One of those folds was plain
wrong (because it does not account for negative offsets), while
the other is unnecessarily complicated and limited (e.g. it will
fail with bitcasts involved).
The disadvantage of this change is that it requires data layout,
so the fold is no longer performed by datalayout-independent
constant folding. I don't think this is a loss in practice, but
it does regress the ConstantExprFold.ll test, which checks folding
without running any passes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116332
The function `ConstantFoldCompareInstruction` uses `unsigned short` to
represent compare predicate, although all usesrs of the respective
include file use definition of CmpInst also. This change replaces
predicate argument type in this function to `ICmpInst::Predicate`,
which allows to make code a bit clearer and simpler.
No functional changes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116379
An inbounds GEP may still cross the sign boundary, so signed icmps
cannot be folded (https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/XSgi4D). This was
previously fixed for other folds in this function, but this one
was missed.
New method `FCmpInst::compare` is added, which evaluates the given
compare predicate for constant operands. Interface is made similar to
`ICmpInst::compare`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116168
When creating a splat of 0 for scalable vectors we tend to create them
with using a combination of shufflevector and insertelement, i.e.
shufflevector (<vscale x 4 x i32> insertelement (<vscale x 4 x i32> poison, i32 0, i32 0),
<vscale x 4 x i32> poison, <vscale x 4 x i32> zeroinitializer)
However, for the case of a zero splat we can actually just replace the
above with zeroinitializer instead. This makes the IR a lot simpler and
easier to read. I have changed ConstantFoldShuffleVectorInstruction to
use zeroinitializer when creating a splat of integer 0 or FP +0.0 values.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113394
