Summary:
Freestanding is *weird*. The standard allows it to differ in a bunch of odd
manners from regular C++, and the committee would like to improve that
situation. I'd like to make libc++ behave better with what freestanding should
be, so that it can be a tool we use in improving the standard. To do that we
need to try stuff out, both with "freestanding the language mode" and
"freestanding the library subset".
Let's start with the super basic: run the libc++ tests in freestanding, using
clang as the compiler, and see what works. The easiest hack to do this:
In utils/libcxx/test/config.py add:
self.cxx.compile_flags += ['-ffreestanding']
Run the tests and they all fail.
Why? Because in freestanding `main` isn't special. This "not special" property
has two effects: main doesn't get mangled, and main isn't allowed to omit its
`return` statement. The first means main gets mangled and the linker can't
create a valid executable for us to test. The second means we spew out warnings
(ew) and the compiler doesn't insert the `return` we omitted, and main just
falls of the end and does whatever undefined behavior (if you're luck, ud2
leading to non-zero return code).
Let's start my work with the basics. This patch changes all libc++ tests to
declare `main` as `int main(int, char**` so it mangles consistently (enabling us
to declare another `extern "C"` main for freestanding which calls the mangled
one), and adds `return 0;` to all places where it was missing. This touches 6124
files, and I apologize.
The former was done with The Magic Of Sed.
The later was done with a (not quite correct but decent) clang tool:
https://gist.github.com/jfbastien/793819ff360baa845483dde81170feed
This works for most tests, though I did have to adjust a few places when e.g.
the test runs with `-x c`, macros are used for main (such as for the filesystem
tests), etc.
Once this is in we can create a freestanding bot which will prevent further
regressions. After that, we can start the real work of supporting C++
freestanding fairly well in libc++.
<rdar://problem/47754795>
Reviewers: ldionne, mclow.lists, EricWF
Subscribers: christof, jkorous, dexonsmith, arphaman, miyuki, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57624
llvm-svn: 353086
to reflect the new license. These used slightly different spellings that
defeated my regular expressions.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351648
These tests were unconditionally asserting that optional and unique_ptr declare throwing hashes, but MSVC++ implements conditional noexcept forwarding that of the underlying hash function. As a result we were failing these tests but there's nothing forbidding strengthening noexcept in that way.
Changed the ASSERT_NOT_NOEXCEPT asserts to use types which themselves have non-noexcept hash functions.
llvm-svn: 300516
These tests were unconditionally asserting that optional and unique_ptr declare throwing hashes, but MSVC++ implements conditional noexcept forwarding that of the underlying hash function. As a result we were failing these tests but there's nothing forbidding strengthening noexcept in that way.
Changed the ASSERT_NOT_NOEXCEPT asserts to use types which themselves have non-noexcept hash functions.
llvm-svn: 299734
Summary:
Exactly what the title says.
This patch also adds a `std::hash<nullptr_t>` specialization in C++17, but it was not added by this paper and I can't find the actual paper that adds it.
See http://wg21.link/P0513R0 for more info.
If there are no comments in the next couple of days I'll commit this
Reviewers: mclow.lists, K-ballo, EricWF
Reviewed By: EricWF
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28938
llvm-svn: 292684
Summary:
Adapt implementation of Library Fundamentals TS optional into an implementation of N4606 optional.
- Update relational operators per http://wg21.link/P0307
- Update to requirements of http://wg21.link/P0032
- Extension: Implement trivial copy/move construction/assignment for `optional<T>` when `T` is trivially copyable.
Audit P/Rs for optional LWG issues:
- 2756 "C++ WP optional<T> should 'forward' T's implicit conversions" Implemented, which also resolves 2753 "Optional's constructors and assignments need constraints" (modulo my refusal to explicitly delete the move operations, which is a design error that I'm working on correcting in the 2756 P/R).
- 2736 "nullopt_t insufficiently constrained" Already conforming. I've added a test ensuring that `nullopt_t` is not copy-initializable from an empty braced-init-list, which I believe is the root intent of the issue, to avoid regression.
- 2740 "constexpr optional<T>::operator->" Already conforming.
- 2746 "Inconsistency between requirements for emplace between optional and variant" No P/R, but note that the author's '"suggested resolution" is already implemented.
- 2748 "swappable traits for optionals" Already conforming.
- 2753 "Optional's constructors and assignments need constraints" Implemented.
Most of the work for this patch was done by Casey Carter @ Microsoft. Thank you Casey!
Reviewers: mclow.lists, CaseyCarter, EricWF
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22741
llvm-svn: 283980
This patch is largely thanks to Casey Carter @ Microsoft. He did the initial
work of porting our experimental implementation and tests over to namespace
std.
llvm-svn: 283977
