This commit allows the outliner to avoid saving and restoring the link register
on AArch64 when it is dead within an entire class of candidates.
This introduces changes to the way the outliner interfaces with the target.
For example, the target now interfaces with the outliner using a
MachineOutlinerInfo struct rather than by using getOutliningCallOverhead and
getOutliningFrameOverhead.
This also improves several comments on the outliner's cost model.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D36721
llvm-svn: 314341
Summary:
According to https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/SplitStacks, the linker expects a zero-sized .note.GNU-split-stack section if split-stack is used (and also .note.GNU-no-split-stack section if it also contains non-split-stack functions), so it can handle the cases where a split-stack function calls non-split-stack function.
This change adds the sections if needed.
Fixes PR #34670.
Reviewers: thanm, rnk, luqmana
Reviewed By: rnk
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Patch by Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38051
llvm-svn: 314335
This was intended to be no-functional-change, but it's not - there's a test diff.
So I thought I should stop here and post it as-is to see if this looks like what was expected
based on the discussion in PR34603:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34603
Notes:
1. The test improvement occurs because the existing 'LateSimplifyCFG' marker is not carried
through the recursive calls to 'SimplifyCFG()->SimplifyCFGOpt().run()->SimplifyCFG()'.
The parameter isn't passed down, so we pick up the default value from the function signature
after the first level. I assumed that was a bug, so I've passed 'Options' down in all of the
'SimplifyCFG' calls.
2. I split 'LateSimplifyCFG' into 2 bits: ConvertSwitchToLookupTable and KeepCanonicalLoops.
This would theoretically allow us to differentiate the transforms controlled by those params
independently.
3. We could stash the optional AssumptionCache pointer and 'LoopHeaders' pointer in the struct too.
I just stopped here to minimize the diffs.
4. Similarly, I stopped short of messing with the pass manager layer. I have another question that
could wait for the follow-up: why is the new pass manager creating the pass with LateSimplifyCFG
set to true no matter where in the pipeline it's creating SimplifyCFG passes?
// Create an early function pass manager to cleanup the output of the
// frontend.
EarlyFPM.addPass(SimplifyCFGPass());
-->
/// \brief Construct a pass with the default thresholds
/// and switch optimizations.
SimplifyCFGPass::SimplifyCFGPass()
: BonusInstThreshold(UserBonusInstThreshold),
LateSimplifyCFG(true) {} <-- switches get converted to lookup tables and loops may not be in canonical form
If this is unintended, then it's possible that the current behavior of dropping the 'LateSimplifyCFG'
setting via recursion was masking this bug.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38138
llvm-svn: 314308
This teach simplifyDemandedBits to handle constant splat vector shifts.
This required changing some uses of getZExtValue to getLimitedValue since we can't rely on legalization using getShiftAmountTy for the shift amount.
I believe there may have been a bug in the ((X << C1) >>u ShAmt) handling where we didn't check if the inner shift was too large. I've fixed that here.
I had to add new patterns to ARM because the zext/sext the patterns were trying to look for got turned into an any_extend with this patch. Happy to split that out too, but not sure how to test without this change.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37665
llvm-svn: 314139
Summary:
This code iterates the 'Orders' vector in parallel with the DbgValue
list, emitting all DBG_VALUEs that occurred between the last IR order
insertion point and the next insertion point. This assumes the
SDDbgValue list is sorted in IR order, which it usually is. However, it
is not sorted when a node with a debug value is replaced with another
one. When this happens, TransferDbgValues is called, and the new value
is added to the end of the list.
The problem can be solved by stably sorting the list by IR order.
Reviewers: aprantl, Ka-Ka
Reviewed By: aprantl
Subscribers: MatzeB, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38197
llvm-svn: 314114
Summary:
Right now there are two functions with the same name, one does the work
and the other one returns true if expansion is needed. Rename
TargetTransformInfo::expandMemCmp to make it more consistent with other
members of TargetTransformInfo.
Remove the unused Instruction* parameter.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38165
llvm-svn: 314096
Summary: Conditional returns were not taken into consideration at all. Implement them by turning them into jumps and normal returns. This means there is a slightly higher performance penalty for conditional returns, but this is the best we can do, and it still disturbs little of the rest.
Reviewers: dberris, echristo
Subscribers: sanjoy, nemanjai, hiraditya, kbarton, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38102
llvm-svn: 314005
At least for the 64-bit and less case, we should be able to determine if we even have a mask without counting any bits. This also removes the need to explicitly check for 0 active bits, isMask will return false for 0.
llvm-svn: 313908
The fix is to avoid invalidating our insertion point in
replaceDbgDeclare:
Builder.insertDeclare(NewAddress, DIVar, DIExpr, Loc, InsertBefore);
+ if (DII == InsertBefore)
+ InsertBefore = &*std::next(InsertBefore->getIterator());
DII->eraseFromParent();
I had to write a unit tests for this instead of a lit test because the
use list order matters in order to trigger the bug.
The reduced C test case for this was:
void useit(int*);
static inline void inlineme() {
int x[2];
useit(x);
}
void f() {
inlineme();
inlineme();
}
llvm-svn: 313905
Summary:
SelectionDAGISel::LowerArguments is associating arguments
with frame indices (FuncInfo->setArgumentFrameIndex). That
information is later on used by EmitFuncArgumentDbgValue to
create DBG_VALUE instructions that denotes that a variable
can be found on the stack.
I discovered that for our (big endian) out-of-tree target
the association created by SelectionDAGISel::LowerArguments
sometimes is wrong. I've seen this happen when a 64-bit value
is passed on the stack. The argument will occupy two stack
slots (frame index X, and frame index X+1). The fault is
that a call to setArgumentFrameIndex is associating the
64-bit argument with frame index X+1. The effect is that the
debug information (DBG_VALUE) will point at the least significant
part of the arguement on the stack. When printing the
argument in a debugger I will get the wrong value.
I managed to create a test case for PowerPC that seems to
show the same kind of problem.
The bugfix will look at the datalayout, taking endianness into
account when examining a BUILD_PAIR node, assuming that the
least significant part is in the first operand of the BUILD_PAIR.
For big endian targets we should use the frame index from
the second operand, as the most significant part will be stored
at the lower address (using the highest frame index).
Reviewers: bogner, rnk, hfinkel, sdardis, aprantl
Reviewed By: aprantl
Subscribers: nemanjai, aprantl, llvm-commits, igorb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37740
llvm-svn: 313901
.. as well as the two subsequent changes r313826 and r313875.
This leads to segfaults in combination with ASAN. Will forward repro
instructions to the original author (rnk).
llvm-svn: 313876
This patch contains fix for reverted commit
rL312318 which was causing failure due to use
of unchecked dyn_cast to CIInit.
Patch by: Nikola Prica.
llvm-svn: 313870
Summary:
This implements the design discussed on llvm-dev for better tracking of
variables that live in memory through optimizations:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-September/117222.html
This is tracked as PR34136
llvm.dbg.addr is intended to be produced and used in almost precisely
the same way as llvm.dbg.declare is today, with the exception that it is
control-dependent. That means that dbg.addr should always have a
position in the instruction stream, and it will allow passes that
optimize memory operations on local variables to insert llvm.dbg.value
calls to reflect deleted stores. See SourceLevelDebugging.rst for more
details.
The main drawback to generating DBG_VALUE machine instrs is that they
usually cause LLVM to emit a location list for DW_AT_location. The next
step will be to teach DwarfDebug.cpp how to recognize more DBG_VALUE
ranges as not needing a location list, and possibly start setting
DW_AT_start_offset for variables whose lifetimes begin mid-scope.
Reviewers: aprantl, dblaikie, probinson
Subscribers: eraman, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37768
llvm-svn: 313825
Add support for passing SwiftError through a register on the Windows x64
calling convention. This allows the use of swifterror attributes on
parameters which is used by the swift front end for the `Error`
parameter. This partially enables building the swift standard library
for Windows x86_64.
llvm-svn: 313791
After r313775, it's easier to maintain a parallel BitVector of spilled
locations indexed by location number.
I wasn't able to build a good reduced test case for this iteration of
the bug, but I added a more direct assertion that spilled values must
use frame index locations. If this bug reappears, it won't only fire on
the NEON vector code that we detected it on, but on medium-sized
integer-only programs as well.
llvm-svn: 313786
Summary:
The new code should be linear in the number of DBG_VALUEs, while the old
code was quadratic. NFC intended.
This is also hopefully a more direct expression of the problem, which is
to:
1. Rewrite all virtual register operands to stack slots or physical
registers
2. Uniquely number those machine operands, assigning them location
numbers
3. Rewrite all uses of the old location numbers in the interval map to
use the new location numbers
In r313400, I attempted to track which locations were spilled in a
parallel bitvector indexed by location number. My code was broken
because these location numbers are not stable during rewriting.
Reviewers: aprantl, hans
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38068
llvm-svn: 313775
This version of the patch fixes an off-by-one error causing PR34596. We
do not need to use std::next(BlockIter) when calling updateDepths, as
BlockIter already points to the next element.
Original commit message:
> For large basic blocks with lots of combinable instructions, the
> MachineTraceMetrics computations in MachineCombiner can dominate the compile
> time, as computing the trace information is quadratic in the number of
> instructions in a BB and it's relevant successors/predecessors.
> In most cases, knowing the instruction depth should be enough to make
> combination decisions. As we already iterate over all instructions in a basic
> block, the instruction depth can be computed incrementally. This reduces the
> cost of machine-combine drastically in cases where lots of instructions
> are combined. The major drawback is that AFAIK, computing the critical path
> length cannot be done incrementally. Therefore we only compute
> instruction depths incrementally, for basic blocks with more
> instructions than inc_threshold. The -machine-combiner-inc-threshold
> option can be used to set the threshold and allows for easier
> experimenting and checking if using incremental updates for all basic
> blocks has any impact on the performance.
>
> Reviewers: sanjoy, Gerolf, MatzeB, efriedma, fhahn
>
> Reviewed By: fhahn
>
> Subscribers: kiranchandramohan, javed.absar, efriedma, llvm-commits
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36619
llvm-svn: 313751
This re-applies commit r313685, this time with the proper updates to
the test cases.
Original commit message:
Unreachable blocks in the machine instr representation are these
weird empty blocks with no successors.
The MIR printer used to not print empty lists of successors. However,
the MIR parser now treats non-printed list of successors as "please
guess it for me". As a result, the parser tries to guess the list of
successors and given the block is empty, just assumes it falls through
the next block (if any).
For instance, the following test case used to fail the verifier.
The MIR printer would print
entry
/ \
true (def) false (no list of successors)
|
split.true (use)
The MIR parser would understand this:
entry
/ \
true (def) false
| / <-- invalid edge
split.true (use)
Because of the invalid edge, we get the "def does not
dominate all uses" error.
The fix consists in printing empty successor lists, so that the parser
knows what to do for unreachable blocks.
rdar://problem/34022159
llvm-svn: 313696
Unreachable blocks in the machine instr representation are these
weird empty blocks with no successors.
The MIR printer used to not print empty lists of successors. However,
the MIR parser now treats non-printed list of successors as "please
guess it for me". As a result, the parser tries to guess the list of
successors and given the block is empty, just assumes it falls through
the next block (if any).
For instance, the following test case used to fail the verifier.
The MIR printer would print
entry
/ \
true (def) false (no list of successors)
|
split.true (use)
The MIR parser would understand this:
entry
/ \
true (def) false
| / <-- invalid edge
split.true (use)
Because of the invalid edge, we get the "def does not
dominate all uses" error.
The fix consists in printing empty successor lists, so that the parser
knows what to do for unreachable blocks.
rdar://problem/34022159
llvm-svn: 313685
This reverts r313640, originally r313400, one more time for essentially
the same issue. My BitVector of spilled location numbers isn't working
because we coalesce identical DBG_VALUE locations as we rewrite them,
invalidating the location numbers used to index the BitVector.
llvm-svn: 313679
I forgot to zero out the BitVector when reusing it between UserValues.
Later uses of the same location number for a different UserValue would
falsely indicate that they were spilled. Usually this would lead to
incorrect debug info, but in some cases they would indicate something
nonsensical like a memory location based on a vector register (Q8 on
ARM).
llvm-svn: 313640
This caused asserts in Chromium. See http://crbug.com/766261
> Summary:
> This comes up in optimized debug info for C++ programs that pass and
> return objects indirectly by address. In these programs,
> llvm.dbg.declare survives optimization, which causes us to emit indirect
> DBG_VALUE instructions. The fast register allocator knows to insert
> DW_OP_deref when spilling indirect DBG_VALUE instructions, but the
> LiveDebugVariables did not until this change.
>
> This fixes part of PR34513. I need to look into why this doesn't work at
> -O0 and I'll send follow up patches to handle that.
>
> Reviewers: aprantl, dblaikie, probinson
>
> Subscribers: qcolombet, hiraditya, llvm-commits
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37911
llvm-svn: 313589
If we have an AssertZext of a truncated value that has already been AssertZext'ed,
we can assert on the wider source op to improve the zext-y knowledge:
assert (trunc (assert X, i8) to iN), i1 --> trunc (assert X, i1) to iN
This moves a fold from being Mips-specific to general combining, and x86 shows
improvements.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37017
llvm-svn: 313577
rL310710 allowed store merging to occur after legalization to catch stores that are created late,
but this exposes a logic hole seen in PR34217:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34217
We will miss merging stores if the target lowers vector extracts into target-specific operations.
This patch allows store merging to occur both before and after legalization if the target chooses
to get maximum merging.
I don't think the potential regressions in the other tests are relevant. The tests are for
correctness of weird IR constructs rather than perf tests, and I think those are still correct.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37987
llvm-svn: 313564
r313390 taught 'allowExtraAnalysis' to check whether remarks are
enabled at all. Use that to only do the expensive instruction printing
if they are.
llvm-svn: 313552
For cases where we are BITCASTing to vectors of smaller elements, then if the entire source was a splatted sign (src's NumSignBits == SrcBitWidth) we can say that the dst's NumSignBit == DstBitWidth, as we're just splitting those sign bits across multiple elements.
We could generalize this but at the moment the only use case I have is to peek through bitcasts to vector comparison results.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37849
llvm-svn: 313543
This reverts commit 6389e7aa724ea7671d096f4770f016c3d86b0d54.
There is a bug in this implementation where the string value of the
checksum is outputted, instead of the actual hex bytes. Therefore the
checksum is incorrect, and this prevent pdbs from being loaded by visual
studio. Revert this until the checksum is emitted correctly.
llvm-svn: 313431
Summary:
This comes up in optimized debug info for C++ programs that pass and
return objects indirectly by address. In these programs,
llvm.dbg.declare survives optimization, which causes us to emit indirect
DBG_VALUE instructions. The fast register allocator knows to insert
DW_OP_deref when spilling indirect DBG_VALUE instructions, but the
LiveDebugVariables did not until this change.
This fixes part of PR34513. I need to look into why this doesn't work at
-O0 and I'll send follow up patches to handle that.
Reviewers: aprantl, dblaikie, probinson
Subscribers: qcolombet, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37911
llvm-svn: 313400
Summary:
Fixes PR34513.
Indirect DBG_VALUEs typically come from dbg.declares of non-trivially
copyable C++ objects that must be passed by address. We were already
handling the case where the virtual register gets allocated to a
physical register and is later spilled. That's what usually happens for
normal parameters that aren't NRVO variables: they usually appear in
physical register parameters, and are spilled later in the function,
which would correctly add deref.
NRVO variables are different because the dbg.declare can come much later
after earlier instructions cause the incoming virtual register to be
spilled.
Also, clean up this code. We only need to look at the first operand of a
DBG_VALUE, which eliminates the operand loop.
Reviewers: aprantl, dblaikie, probinson
Subscribers: MatzeB, qcolombet, llvm-commits, hiraditya
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37929
llvm-svn: 313399
This means that we can honor -fdata-sections rather than
always creating a segment for each symbol.
It also allows for a followup change to add .init_array and friends.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37876
llvm-svn: 313395
Previously the 'Padding' argument was the number of padding
bytes to add. However most callers that use 'Padding' know
how many overall bytes they need to write. With the previous
code this would mean encoding the LEB once to find out how
many bytes it would occupy and then using this to calulate
the 'Padding' value.
See: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36595
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37494
llvm-svn: 313393
This caused PR34629: asserts firing when building Chromium. It also broke some
buildbots building test-suite as reported on the commit thread.
> Summary:
> 1/ Operand folding during complex pattern matching for LEAs has been
> extended, such that it promotes Scale to accommodate similar operand
> appearing in the DAG.
> e.g.
> T1 = A + B
> T2 = T1 + 10
> T3 = T2 + A
> For above DAG rooted at T3, X86AddressMode will no look like
> Base = B , Index = A , Scale = 2 , Disp = 10
>
> 2/ During OptimizeLEAPass down the pipeline factorization is now performed over LEAs
> so that if there is an opportunity then complex LEAs (having 3 operands)
> could be factored out.
> e.g.
> leal 1(%rax,%rcx,1), %rdx
> leal 1(%rax,%rcx,2), %rcx
> will be factored as following
> leal 1(%rax,%rcx,1), %rdx
> leal (%rdx,%rcx) , %edx
>
> 3/ Aggressive operand folding for AM based selection for LEAs is sensitive to loops,
> thus avoiding creation of any complex LEAs within a loop.
>
> Reviewers: lsaba, RKSimon, craig.topper, qcolombet
>
> Reviewed By: lsaba
>
> Subscribers: spatel, igorb, llvm-commits
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35014
llvm-svn: 313376
Summary:
The checksums had already been placed in the IR, this patch allows
MCCodeView to actually write it out to an MCStreamer.
Subscribers: llvm-commits, hiraditya
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37157
llvm-svn: 313374
removing them"
This was temporarily reverted, but now that the fix has been commited (r313197)
it should be put back in place.
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34502
This reverts commit 9ef93d9dc4c51568e858cf8203cd2c5ce8dca796.
llvm-svn: 313349
