This file lists every pass in LLVM, and is included by Pass.h, which is
very popular. Every time we add, remove, or rename a pass in LLVM, it
caused lots of recompilation.
I found this fact by looking at this table, which is sorted by the
number of times a file was changed over the last 100,000 git commits
multiplied by the number of object files that depend on it in the
current checkout:
recompiles touches affected_files header
342380 95 3604 llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLExtras.h
314730 234 1345 llvm/include/llvm/InitializePasses.h
307036 118 2602 llvm/include/llvm/ADT/APInt.h
213049 59 3611 llvm/include/llvm/Support/MathExtras.h
170422 47 3626 llvm/include/llvm/Support/Compiler.h
162225 45 3605 llvm/include/llvm/ADT/Optional.h
158319 63 2513 llvm/include/llvm/ADT/Triple.h
140322 39 3598 llvm/include/llvm/ADT/StringRef.h
137647 59 2333 llvm/include/llvm/Support/Error.h
131619 73 1803 llvm/include/llvm/Support/FileSystem.h
Before this change, touching InitializePasses.h would cause 1345 files
to recompile. After this change, touching it only causes 550 compiles in
an incremental rebuild.
Reviewers: bkramer, asbirlea, bollu, jdoerfert
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70211
For example:
long long test(long long a, long long b) {
if (a << b > 0)
return b;
if (a << b < 0)
return a;
return a*b;
}
Produces:
sld. 5, 3, 4
ble 0, .LBB0_2
mr 3, 4
blr
.LBB0_2: # %if.end
cmpldi 5, 0
li 5, 1
isel 4, 4, 5, 2
mulld 3, 4, 3
blr
But the compare (cmpldi 5, 0) is redundant and can be removed (CR0 already
contains the result of that comparison).
The root cause of this is that LLVM converts signed comparisons into equality
comparison based on dominance. Equality comparisons are unsigned by default, so
we get either a record-form or cmp (without the l for logical) feeding a cmpl.
That is the situation we want to avoid here.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60506
Add a pass to lower is.constant and objectsize intrinsics
This pass lowers is.constant and objectsize intrinsics not simplified by
earlier constant folding, i.e. if the object given is not constant or if
not using the optimized pass chain. The result is recursively simplified
and constant conditionals are pruned, so that dead blocks are removed
even for -O0. This allows inline asm blocks with operand constraints to
work all the time.
The new pass replaces the existing lowering in the codegen-prepare pass
and fallbacks in SDAG/GlobalISEL and FastISel. The latter now assert
on the intrinsics.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65280
llvm-svn: 374784
This pass lowers is.constant and objectsize intrinsics not simplified by
earlier constant folding, i.e. if the object given is not constant or if
not using the optimized pass chain. The result is recursively simplified
and constant conditionals are pruned, so that dead blocks are removed
even for -O0. This allows inline asm blocks with operand constraints to
work all the time.
The new pass replaces the existing lowering in the codegen-prepare pass
and fallbacks in SDAG/GlobalISEL and FastISel. The latter now assert
on the intrinsics.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65280
llvm-svn: 374743
The static analyzer is warning about potential null dereferences, but in these cases we should be able to use cast<> directly and if not assert will fire for us.
llvm-svn: 374085
Summary:
An erroneously negated if-statement by an earlier (March 2019) bugfix left phi replacement/simplification under optimizeMemoryInst() in CodeGenPrepare largely inactivated. The error was found when csmith found that the same assert as in the original bug report could still be triggered in a different way. This patch fixes the bugfix. The original bug was:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41052
... and the previous fix was D59358.
Reviewers: aprantl, skatkov
Reviewed By: skatkov
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67838
llvm-svn: 373084
The changes here are based on the corresponding diffs for allowing FMF on 'select':
D61917
As discussed there, we want to have fast-math-flags be a property of an FP value
because the alternative (having them on things like fcmp) leads to logical
inconsistency such as:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38086
The earlier patch for select made almost no practical difference because most
unoptimized conditional code begins life as a phi (based on what I see in clang).
Similarly, I don't expect this patch to do much on its own either because
SimplifyCFG promptly drops the flags when converting to select on a minimal
example like:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39535
But once we have this plumbing in place, we should be able to wire up the FMF
propagation and start solving cases like that.
The change to RecurrenceDescriptor::AddReductionVar() is required to prevent a
regression in a LoopVectorize test. We are intersecting the FMF of any
FPMathOperator there, so if a phi is not properly annotated, new math
instructions may not be either. Once we fix the propagation in SimplifyCFG, it
may be safe to remove that hack.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67564
llvm-svn: 372866
In MVE, as of rL371218, we are attempting to sink chains of instructions such as:
%l1 = insertelement <8 x i8> undef, i8 %l0, i32 0
%broadcast.splat26 = shufflevector <8 x i8> %l1, <8 x i8> undef, <8 x i32> zeroinitializer
In certain situations though, we can end up breaking the dominance relations of
instructions. This happens when we sink the instruction into a loop, but cannot
remove the originals. The Use is updated, which might in fact be a Use from the
second instruction to the first.
This attempts to fix that by reversing the order of instruction that are sunk,
and ensuring that we update the uses on new instructions if they have already
been sunk, not the old ones.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67366
llvm-svn: 371743
Up to now, we've decided whether to sink address calculations using GEPs or
normal arithmetic based on the useAA hook, but there are other reasons GEPs
might be preferred. So this patch splits the two questions, with a default
implementation falling back to useAA.
llvm-svn: 371721
Summary:
This is the first change to enable the TLI to be built per-function so
that -fno-builtin* handling can be migrated to use function attributes.
See discussion on D61634 for background. This is an enabler for fixing
handling of these options for LTO, for example.
This change should not affect behavior, as the provided function is not
yet used to build a specifically per-function TLI, but rather enables
that migration.
Most of the changes were very mechanical, e.g. passing a Function to the
legacy analysis pass's getTLI interface, or in Module level cases,
adding a callback. This is similar to the way the per-function TTI
analysis works.
There was one place where we were looking for builtins but not in the
context of a specific function. See FindCXAAtExit in
lib/Transforms/IPO/GlobalOpt.cpp. I'm somewhat concerned my workaround
could provide the wrong behavior in some corner cases. Suggestions
welcome.
Reviewers: chandlerc, hfinkel
Subscribers: arsenm, dschuff, jvesely, nhaehnle, mehdi_amini, javed.absar, sbc100, jgravelle-google, eraman, aheejin, steven_wu, george.burgess.iv, dexonsmith, jfb, asbirlea, gchatelet, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66428
llvm-svn: 371284
I don't think anything in this loop modifies the control flow and we don't restart any iteration after setting the flag.
This code was added in http://reviews.llvm.org/D16893 but looking at the test case added there the code that caused the dominator tree to change was merging blocks with their predecessor not the bitreverse optimization.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66366
llvm-svn: 369283
If OptimizeExtractBits() encountered a shift instruction with no operands at all,
it would erase the instruction, but still return false.
This previously didn’t matter because its caller would always return after
processing the instruction, but https://reviews.llvm.org/D63233 changed the
function’s caller to fall through if it returned false, which would then cause
a use-after-free detectable by ASAN.
This change makes OptimizeExtractBits return true if it removes a shift
instruction with no users, terminating processing of the instruction.
Patch by: @brentdax (Brent Royal-Gordon)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66330
llvm-svn: 369168
Now that we've moved to C++14, we no longer need the llvm::make_unique
implementation from STLExtras.h. This patch is a mechanical replacement
of (hopefully) all the llvm::make_unique instances across the monorepo.
llvm-svn: 369013
Summary:
The old code can be simplified to define the element type of TailCalls as `BasicBlock` not `CallInst`. Also I use the for-range loop instead the for loop.
Reviewed By: jsji
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64905
llvm-svn: 367644
Some GEPs were not being split, presumably because that split would just be
undone by the DAGCombiner. Not performing those splits can prevent important
optimizations, such as preventing the element indices / member offsets from
being (partially) folded into load/store instruction immediates. This patch:
- Makes the splits also occur in the cases where the base address and the GEP
are in the same BB.
- Ensures that the DAGCombiner doesn't reassociate them back again.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60294
llvm-svn: 363544
This is based on the example/discussion in PR37428:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37428
Proper vector shift instructions don't appear until AVX2, so we may generate several
extra instructions within a loop trying to compensate for that. It's difficult to
recover from that shift expansion later than this, so use the existing TLI hook and
splat analysis to enable better codegen.
This extends CGP functionality introduced with:
rL201655
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63233
llvm-svn: 363511
For some reason multiple places need to do this, and the variant the
loop unroller and inliner use was not handling it.
Also, introduce a new wrapper to be slightly more precise, since on
AMDGPU some addrspacecasts are free, but not no-ops.
llvm-svn: 362436
Just a minor refactoring to use the new helper method
DataLayout::typeSizeEqualsStoreSize(). This is done when
checking if getTypeSizeInBits is equal/non-equal to
getTypeStoreSizeInBits.
llvm-svn: 361613
Summary:
It is a common thing to loop over every `PHINode` in some `BasicBlock`
and change old `BasicBlock` incoming block to a new `BasicBlock` incoming block.
`replaceSuccessorsPhiUsesWith()` already had code to do that,
it just wasn't a function.
So outline it into a new function, and use it.
Reviewers: chandlerc, craig.topper, spatel, danielcdh
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61013
llvm-svn: 359996
Summary:
There is `PHINode::getBasicBlockIndex()`, `PHINode::setIncomingBlock()`
and `PHINode::getNumOperands()`, but no function to replace every
specified `BasicBlock*` predecessor with some other specified `BasicBlock*`.
Clearly, there are a lot of places that could use that functionality.
Reviewers: chandlerc, craig.topper, spatel, danielcdh
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61011
llvm-svn: 359995
This is a subset of the original commit from rL359879
which was reverted because it could crash when using the 'RemovedInstructions'
structure that enables delayed deletion of dead instructions. The motivating
compile-time win does not require that change though. We should get most of
that win from this change alone.
Using/updating a dominator tree to match math overflow patterns may be very
expensive in compile-time (because of the way CGP uses a DT), so just handle
the single-block case.
See post-commit thread for rL354298 for more details:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20190422/646276.html
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61075
llvm-svn: 359969
Using/updating a dominator tree to match math overflow patterns may be very
expensive in compile-time (because of the way CGP uses a DT), so just handle
the single-block case.
Also, we were restarting the iterator loops when doing the overflow intrinsic
transforms by marking the dominator tree for update. That was done to prevent
iterating over a removed instruction. But we can postpone the deletion using
the existing "RemovedInsts" structure, and that means we don't need to update
the DT.
See post-commit thread for rL354298 for more details:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20190422/646276.html
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61075
llvm-svn: 359879
The simple case of:
```
int *callee();
void *caller(void *a) {
if (a == NULL)
return callee();
return a;
}
```
would generate a regular call instead of a tail call because we don't
look through the bitcast of the call to `callee` when duplicating the
return blocks.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60837
llvm-svn: 359041
Summary:
A recent fix (r355751) caused a compile time regression because setting
the ModifiedDT flag in optimizeSelectInst means that each time a select
instruction is optimized the function walk in runOnFunction stops and
restarts again (which was needed to build a new DT before we started
building it lazily in r356937). Now that the DT is built lazily, a
simple fix is to just reset the DT at this point, rather than restarting
the whole function walk.
In the future other places that set ModifiedDT may want to switch to
just resetting the DT directly. But that will require an evaluation to
ensure that they don't otherwise need to restart the function walk.
Reviewers: spatel
Subscribers: jdoerfert, llvm-commits, xur
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59889
llvm-svn: 357111
Summary:
In r355512 CGP was changed to build the DominatorTree only once per
function traversal, to avoid repeatedly building it each time it was
accessed. This solved one compile time issue but introduced another. In
the second case, we now were building the DT unnecessarily many times
when we performed many function traversals (i.e. more than once per
function when running CGP because of changes made each time).
Change to saving the DT in the CodeGenPrepare object, and building it
lazily when needed. It is reset whenever we need to rebuild it.
The case that exposed the issue there are 617 functions, and we walk
them (i.e. execute the "while (MadeChange)" loop in runOnFunction) a
total of 12083 times (so previously we were building the DT 12083
times). With this patch we only build the DT 844 times (average of 1.37
times per function). We dropped the total time to compile this file from
538.11s without this patch to 339.63s with it.
There is still an issue as CGP is taking much longer than all other
passes even with this patch, and before a recent compiler release cut at
r355392 the total time to this compile was only 97 sec with a huge
reduction in CGP time. I suspect that one of the other recent changes to
CGP led to iterating each function many more times on average, but I
need to do some more investigation.
Reviewers: spatel
Subscribers: jdoerfert, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59696
llvm-svn: 356937
This is probably a bigger limitation than necessary, but since we don't have any evidence yet
that this transform led to real-world perf improvements rather than regressions, I'm making a
quick, blunt fix.
In the motivating x86 example from:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41129
...and shown in the regression test, we want to avoid an extra instruction in the dominating
block because that could be costly.
The x86 LSR test diff is reversing the changes from D57789. There's no evidence that 1 version
is any better than the other yet.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59602
llvm-svn: 356665
This should be extended, but CGP does some strange things,
so I'm intentionally not changing the potential order of
any transforms yet.
llvm-svn: 356566
Summary:
This is a fix to bug 41052:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41052
While trying to optimize a memory instruction in a dead basic block, we end up registering the same phi for replacement twice. This patch avoids registering more than the first replacement candidate for a phi.
Patch by: JesperAntonsson
Reviewers: skatkov, aprantl
Reviewed By: aprantl
Subscribers: jdoerfert, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59358
llvm-svn: 356260
This is almost the same as:
rL355345
...and should prevent any potential crashing from examples like:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41064
...although the bug was masked by:
rL355823
...and I'm not sure how to repro the problem after that change.
llvm-svn: 356218
Targets can potentially emit more efficient code if they know address
computations never overflow. For example ILP32 code on AArch64 (which only has
64-bit address computation) can ignore the possibility of overflow with this
extra information.
llvm-svn: 355926
Inserting an overflowing arithmetic intrinsic can increase register
pressure by producing two values at a point where only one is needed,
while the second use maybe several blocks away. This increase in
pressure is likely to be more detrimental on performance than
rematerialising one of the original instructions.
So, check that the arithmetic and compare instructions are no further
apart than their immediate successor/predecessor.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59024
llvm-svn: 355823
r44412 fixed a huge compile time regression but it needed ModifiedDT flag to be
maintained correctly in optimizations in optimizeBlock() and optimizeInst().
Function optimizeSelectInst() does not update the flag.
This patch propagates the flag in optimizeSelectInst() back to
optimizeBlock().
This patch also removes ModifiedDT in CodeGenPrepare class (which is not used).
The property of ModifiedDT is now recorded in a ref parameter.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59139
llvm-svn: 355751
Summary:
In r354298 a DominatorTree construction was added via new function
combineToUSubWithOverflow, which was subsequently restructured into
replaceMathCmpWithIntrinsic in r354689. We are hitting a very long
compile time due to this repeated construction, once per math cmp in
the function.
We shouldn't need to build the DominatorTree more than once per
function, except when a transformation invalidates it. There is already
a boolean flag that is returned from these methods indicating whether
the DT has been modified. We can simply build the DT once per
Function walk in CodeGenPrepare::runOnFunction, since any time a change
is made we break out of the Function walk and restart it.
I modified the code so that both replaceMathCmpWithIntrinsic as well as
mergeSExts (which was also building a DT) use the DT constructed by the
run method.
From -mllvm -time-passes:
Before this patch: CodeGen Prepare user time is 328s
With this patch: CodeGen Prepare user time is 21s
Reviewers: spatel
Subscribers: jdoerfert, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58995
llvm-svn: 355512
The test is reduced from an example in the post-commit thread for:
rL354746
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20190304/632396.html
While we must avoid dying here, the real question should be:
Why is non-canonical and/or degenerate code making it to CGP when
using the new pass manager?
llvm-svn: 355345
There's likely a missed IR canonicalization for at least 1 of these
patterns. Otherwise, we wouldn't have needed the pattern-matching
enhancement in D57516.
Note that -- unlike usubo added with D57789 -- the TLI hook for
this transform defaults to 'on'. So if there's any perf fallout
from this, targets should look at how they're lowering the uaddo
node in SDAG and/or override that hook.
The x86 diffs suggest that there's some missing pattern-matching
for forming inc/dec.
This should fix the remaining known problems in:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40486https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31754
llvm-svn: 354746
We need to enhance the uaddo matching to handle special-cases
as seen in PR40486 and PR31754. That means we won't necessarily
have a def-use pattern, so we'll need to check dominance to
determine where to place the intrinsic (as we already do for
usubo). This preliminary patch is just rearranging the code,
so the planned follow-up to improve uaddo will be more clear.
llvm-svn: 354689
