The XformToShuffleWithZero method currently checks AND masks at the per-lane level for all-one and all-zero constants and attempts to convert them to legal shuffle clear masks.
This patch generalises XformToShuffleWithZero, splitting and checking the sub-lanes of the constants down to the byte level to see if any legal shuffle clear masks are possible. This allows a lot of masks (often from legalization or truncation) to be folded into existing shuffle patterns and removes a lot of constant mask loading.
There are a few examples of poor shuffle lowering that are exposed by this patch that will be cleaned up in future patches (e.g. merging shuffles that are separated by bitcasts, x86 legalized v8i8 zero extension uses PMOVZX+AND+AND instead of AND+PMOVZX, etc.)
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11518
llvm-svn: 243831
Making allowableAlignment() more accessible was suggested as a predecessor patch
for D10662, so I've pulled it into TargetLowering. This let's us remove 4 instances
of duplicate logic in LegalizeDAG.
There's a subtle functional change in the implementation: the existing
allowableAlignment() code was using getPrefTypeAlignment() when checking
alignment with the DataLayout and assumed that was fast. In this implementation,
we use getABITypeAlignment() and assume that is fast. See the TODO comment or the
discussion in the Phab review for future improvements in this implementation
(don't use the data layout at all).
There are no regression test changes from this difference, and I'm not sure how to
expose it via a test. I think we actually do want to provide the 'Fast' param when
checking this from DAGCombiner::MergeConsecutiveStores(). Ie, we shouldn't merge
stores if the new stores are not going to be fast. But that change will require
fixing allowsMisalignedMemoryAccess() overrides as noted in D10662.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10905
llvm-svn: 243549
PR24141: https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=24141
contains a test case where we have duplicate entries in a node's uses() list.
After r241826, we use CombineTo() to delete dead nodes when combining the uses into
reciprocal multiplies, but this fails if we encounter the just-deleted node again in
the list.
The solution in this patch is to not add duplicate entries to the list of users that
we will subsequently iterate over. For the test case, this avoids triggering the
combine divisors logic entirely because there really is only one user of the divisor.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11345
llvm-svn: 243500
This fix was suggested as part of D11345 and is part of fixing PR24141.
With this change, we can avoid walking the uses of a divisor node if the target
doesn't want the combineRepeatedFPDivisors transform in the first place.
There is no NFC-intended other than that.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11531
llvm-svn: 243498
We don't bitcast the UNDEFs - that is done in visitVECTOR_SHUFFLE, and the getValueType should come from the operand's SDValue not the SDNode.
llvm-svn: 242640
The motivation is to allow GatherAllAliases / FindBetterChain
to not give up on dependent loads of a pointer from constant memory.
This is important for AMDGPU, because most loads are pointers
derived from a load of a kernel argument from constant memory.
llvm-svn: 241948
This patch fixes bugs that were exposed by the addition of fast-math-flags in the DAG:
r237046 ( http://reviews.llvm.org/rL237046 ):
1. When replacing a division node, it's not enough to RAUW.
We should call CombineTo() to delete dead nodes and combine again.
2. Because we are changing the DAG, we can't return an empty SDValue
after the transform. As the code comments say:
Visitation implementation - Implement dag node combining for different node types.
The semantics are as follows: Return Value:
SDValue.getNode() == 0 - No change was made
SDValue.getNode() == N - N was replaced, is dead and has been handled.
otherwise - N should be replaced by the returned Operand.
The new test case shows no difference with or without this patch, but it will crash if
we re-apply r237046 or enable FMF via the current -enable-fmf-dag cl::opt.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9893
llvm-svn: 241826
Summary:
This change is part of a series of commits dedicated to have a single
DataLayout during compilation by using always the one owned by the
module.
Reviewers: echristo
Subscribers: jholewinski, llvm-commits, rafael, yaron.keren
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11040
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
llvm-svn: 241778
Summary:
This change is part of a series of commits dedicated to have a single
DataLayout during compilation by using always the one owned by the
module.
Reviewers: echristo
Subscribers: jholewinski, llvm-commits, rafael, yaron.keren
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11037
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
llvm-svn: 241776
Summary:
This change is part of a series of commits dedicated to have a single
DataLayout during compilation by using always the one owned by the
module.
Reviewers: echristo
Subscribers: jholewinski, ted, yaron.keren, rafael, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11028
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
llvm-svn: 241775
Summary:
This change is part of a series of commits dedicated to have a single
DataLayout during compilation by using always the one owned by the
module.
Reviewers: echristo
Subscribers: llvm-commits, rafael, yaron.keren
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11017
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
llvm-svn: 241655
Summary:
SelectionDAG itself is not invoking directly the DataLayout in the
TargetMachine, but the "TargetLowering" class is still using it. I'll
address it in a following commit.
This change is part of a series of commits dedicated to have a single
DataLayout during compilation by using always the one owned by the
module.
Reviewers: echristo
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11000
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
llvm-svn: 241618
The code responsible for shl folding in the DAGCombiner was assuming incorrectly that all constants are less than 64 bits. This patch simply changes the way values are compared.
It has been reverted previously because of some problems with comparing APInt with raw uint64_t. That has been fixed/changed with r241204.
llvm-svn: 241254
Summary: This patch fixes the cases of sext/zext constant folding in DAG combiner where constans do not fit 64 bits. The fix simply removes un$
Test Plan: New regression test included.
Reviewers: RKSimon
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Subscribers: RKSimon, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10607
llvm-svn: 240991
We had a hack in SDAGBuilder in place to work around this but now we
can avoid that. Call BuildExactSDIV from BuildSDIV so DAGCombiner can
perform this trick automatically.
The added check in DAGCombiner is necessary to prevent exact sdiv by pow2
from regressing as the target-specific pow2 lowering is not aware of
exact bits yet.
This is mostly covered by existing tests. One side effect is that we
get the better lowering for exact vector sdivs now too :)
llvm-svn: 240891
Summary: The code responsible for shl folding in the DAGCombiner was assuming incorrectly that all constants are less than 64 bits. This patch simply changes the way values are compared.
Test Plan: A regression test included.
Reviewers: andreadb
Reviewed By: andreadb
Subscribers: andreadb, test, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10602
llvm-svn: 240291
This will allow classes to implement the AA interface without deriving
from the class or referencing an internal enum of some other class as
their return types.
Also, to a pretty fundamental extent, concepts such as 'NoAlias',
'MayAlias', and 'MustAlias' are first class concepts in LLVM and we
aren't saving anything by scoping them heavily.
My mild preference would have been to use a scoped enum, but that
feature is essentially completely broken AFAICT. I'm extremely
disappointed. For example, we cannot through any reasonable[1] means
construct an enum class (or analog) which has scoped names but converts
to a boolean in order to test for the possibility of aliasing.
[1]: Richard Smith came up with a "solution", but it requires class
templates, and lots of boilerplate setting up the enumeration multiple
times. Something like Boost.PP could potentially bundle this up, but
even that would be quite painful and it doesn't seem realistically worth
it. The enum class solution would probably work without the need for
a bool conversion.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10495
llvm-svn: 240255
The patch is generated using this command:
tools/clang/tools/extra/clang-tidy/tool/run-clang-tidy.py -fix \
-checks=-*,llvm-namespace-comment -header-filter='llvm/.*|clang/.*' \
llvm/lib/
Thanks to Eugene Kosov for the original patch!
llvm-svn: 240137
that it is its own entity in the form of MemoryLocation, and update all
the callers.
This is an entirely mechanical change. References to "Location" within
AA subclases become "MemoryLocation", and elsewhere
"AliasAnalysis::Location" becomes "MemoryLocation". Hope that helps
out-of-tree folks update.
llvm-svn: 239885
This is an updated version of the patch that was checked in at:
http://reviews.llvm.org/rL237046
but subsequently reverted because it exposed a bug in the DAG Combiner:
http://reviews.llvm.org/D9893
This time, there's an enablement flag ("EnableFMFInDAG") around the code in
SelectionDAGBuilder where we copy the set of FP optimization flags from IR
instructions to DAG nodes. So, in theory, there should be no functional change
from this patch as-is, but it will allow testing with the added functionality
to proceed via "-enable-fmf-dag" passed to llc.
This patch adds the minimum plumbing necessary to use IR-level
fast-math-flags (FMF) in the backend without actually using
them for anything yet. This is a follow-on to:
http://reviews.llvm.org/rL235997
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10403
llvm-svn: 239828
Reapply r239539. Don't assume the collected number of
stores is the same vector size. Just take the first N
stores to fill the vector.
llvm-svn: 239825
Now actually stores the non-zero constant instead of 0.
I somehow forgot to include this part of r238108.
The test change was just an independent instruction order swap,
so just add another check line to satisfy CHECK-NEXT.
llvm-svn: 239539
For targets with a free fneg, this fold is always a net loss if it
ends up duplicating the multiply, so definitely avoid it.
This might be true for some targets without a free fneg too, but
I'll leave that for future investigation.
llvm-svn: 239167
Also, moved test cases from CodeGen/X86/fold-buildvector-bug.ll into
CodeGen/X86/buildvec-insertvec.ll and regenerated CHECK lines using
update_llc_test_checks.py.
llvm-svn: 239142
Method 'visitBUILD_VECTOR' in the DAGCombiner knows how to combine a
build_vector of a bunch of extract_vector_elt nodes and constant zero nodes
into a shuffle blend with a zero vector.
However, method 'visitBUILD_VECTOR' forgot that a floating point
build_vector may contain negative zero as well as positive zero.
Example:
define <2 x double> @example(<2 x double> %A) {
entry:
%0 = extractelement <2 x double> %A, i32 0
%1 = insertelement <2 x double> undef, double %0, i32 0
%2 = insertelement <2 x double> %1, double -0.0, i32 1
ret <2 x double> %2
}
Before this patch, llc (with -mattr=+sse4.1) wrongly generated
movq %xmm0, %xmm0 # xmm0 = xmm0[0],zero
So, the sign bit of the negative zero was effectively lost.
This patch fixes the problem by adding explicit checks for positive zero.
With this patch, llc produces the following code for the example above:
movhpd .LCPI0_0(%rip), %xmm0
where .LCPI0_0 referes to a 'double -0'.
llvm-svn: 239070
On GPU targets, materializing constants is cheap and stores are
expensive, so only doing this for zero vectors was silly.
Most of the new testcases aren't optimally merged, and are for
later improvements.
llvm-svn: 238108
