mirror of
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project.git
synced 2025-04-18 18:36:42 +00:00
1d0759e6c3
add_new_check.py does not work properly for checks that generate fixes in base class. Adding some comments to those checks in order to fix list.rst generation.
38 lines
1.3 KiB
C++
38 lines
1.3 KiB
C++
//===--- NoexceptDestructorCheck.cpp - clang-tidy -------------------------===//
|
|
//
|
|
// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions.
|
|
// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
|
|
// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception
|
|
//
|
|
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
|
|
|
|
#include "NoexceptDestructorCheck.h"
|
|
#include "clang/ASTMatchers/ASTMatchFinder.h"
|
|
|
|
using namespace clang::ast_matchers;
|
|
|
|
// FixItHint - comment added to fix list.rst generation in add_new_check.py.
|
|
// Do not remove. Fixes are generated in base class.
|
|
|
|
namespace clang::tidy::performance {
|
|
|
|
void NoexceptDestructorCheck::registerMatchers(MatchFinder *Finder) {
|
|
Finder->addMatcher(functionDecl(unless(isDeleted()), cxxDestructorDecl())
|
|
.bind(BindFuncDeclName),
|
|
this);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
DiagnosticBuilder
|
|
NoexceptDestructorCheck::reportMissingNoexcept(const FunctionDecl *FuncDecl) {
|
|
return diag(FuncDecl->getLocation(), "destructors should "
|
|
"be marked noexcept");
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void NoexceptDestructorCheck::reportNoexceptEvaluatedToFalse(
|
|
const FunctionDecl *FuncDecl, const Expr *NoexceptExpr) {
|
|
diag(NoexceptExpr->getExprLoc(),
|
|
"noexcept specifier on the destructor evaluates to 'false'");
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
} // namespace clang::tidy::performance
|