llvm-project/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/performance/NoexceptMoveConstructorCheck.cpp
Piotr Zegar 1d0759e6c3 [clang-tidy][NFC] Fix list.rst generation when adding check
add_new_check.py does not work properly for checks that
generate fixes in base class. Adding some comments to those
checks in order to fix list.rst generation.
2023-07-22 15:55:22 +00:00

45 lines
1.6 KiB
C++

//===--- NoexceptMoveConstructorCheck.cpp - clang-tidy---------------------===//
//
// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions.
// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception
//
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
#include "NoexceptMoveConstructorCheck.h"
#include "clang/ASTMatchers/ASTMatchFinder.h"
using namespace clang::ast_matchers;
// FixItHint - comment added to fix list.rst generation in add_new_check.py.
// Do not remove. Fixes are generated in base class.
namespace clang::tidy::performance {
void NoexceptMoveConstructorCheck::registerMatchers(MatchFinder *Finder) {
Finder->addMatcher(
cxxMethodDecl(unless(isDeleted()),
anyOf(cxxConstructorDecl(isMoveConstructor()),
isMoveAssignmentOperator()))
.bind(BindFuncDeclName),
this);
}
DiagnosticBuilder NoexceptMoveConstructorCheck::reportMissingNoexcept(
const FunctionDecl *FuncDecl) {
return diag(FuncDecl->getLocation(),
"move %select{assignment operator|constructor}0s should "
"be marked noexcept")
<< CXXConstructorDecl::classof(FuncDecl);
}
void NoexceptMoveConstructorCheck::reportNoexceptEvaluatedToFalse(
const FunctionDecl *FuncDecl, const Expr *NoexceptExpr) {
diag(NoexceptExpr->getExprLoc(),
"noexcept specifier on the move %select{assignment "
"operator|constructor}0 evaluates to 'false'")
<< CXXConstructorDecl::classof(FuncDecl);
}
} // namespace clang::tidy::performance