llvm-project/clang/test/SemaCXX/enum-bitfield.cpp
Richard Smith c90e198107 Fix parsing of enum-base to follow C++11 rules.
Previously we implemented non-standard disambiguation rules to
distinguish an enum-base from a bit-field but otherwise treated a :
after an elaborated-enum-specifier as introducing an enum-base. That
misparses various examples (anywhere an elaborated-type-specifier can
appear followed by a colon, such as within a ternary operator or
_Generic).

We now implement the C++11 rules, with the old cases accepted as
extensions where that seemed reasonable. These amount to:
 * an enum-base must always be accompanied by an enum definition (except
   in a standalone declaration of the form 'enum E : T;')
 * in a member-declaration, 'enum E :' always introduces an enum-base,
   never a bit-field
 * in a type-specifier (or similar context), 'enum E :' is not
   permitted; the colon means whatever else it would mean in that
   context.

Fixed underlying types for enums are also permitted in Objective-C and
under MS extensions, plus as a language extension in all other modes.
The behavior in ObjC and MS extensions modes is unchanged (but the
bit-field disambiguation is a bit better); remaining language modes
follow the C++11 rules.

Fixes PR45726, PR39979, PR19810, PR44941, and most of PR24297, plus C++
core issues 1514 and 1966.
2020-05-08 19:32:00 -07:00

39 lines
904 B
C++

// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -pedantic -std=c++11 -verify -triple x86_64-apple-darwin %s
enum E {};
struct Z {};
typedef int Integer;
struct X {
enum E : 1; // expected-error{{anonymous bit-field}}
enum E : Z; // expected-error{{invalid underlying type}}
enum E2 : int;
enum E3 : Integer;
};
struct Y {
enum E : int(2); // expected-error{{anonymous bit-field}}
enum E : Z(); // expected-error{{anonymous bit-field}} expected-error{{integral constant expression must have integral or unscoped enumeration type, not 'Z'}}
};
namespace pr18587 {
struct A {
enum class B {
C
};
};
const int C = 4;
struct D {
A::B : C;
};
}
enum WithUnderlying : unsigned { wu_value };
struct WithUnderlyingBitfield {
WithUnderlying wu : 3;
} wu = { wu_value };
int want_unsigned(unsigned);
int want_unsigned(int) = delete;
int check_enum_bitfield_promotes_correctly = want_unsigned(wu.wu);