llvm-project/clang/test/SemaCXX/switch-implicit-fallthrough-per-method.cpp
Richard Smith 4f902c7ecc P0188R1: add support for standard [[fallthrough]] attribute. This is almost
exactly the same as clang's existing [[clang::fallthrough]] attribute, which
has been updated to have the same semantics. The one significant difference
is that [[fallthrough]] is ill-formed if it's not used immediately before a
switch label (even when -Wimplicit-fallthrough is disabled). To support that,
we now build a CFG of any function that uses a '[[fallthrough]];' statement
to check.

In passing, fix some bugs with our support for statement attributes -- in
particular, diagnose their use on declarations, rather than asserting.

llvm-svn: 262881
2016-03-08 00:32:55 +00:00

51 lines
1.3 KiB
C++

// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify -std=c++11 -Wimplicit-fallthrough-per-function %s
int fallthrough(int n) {
switch (n / 10) {
case 0:
n += 100;
case 1: // expected-warning{{unannotated fall-through}} expected-note{{insert '[[clang::fallthrough]];' to silence this warning}} expected-note{{insert 'break;' to avoid fall-through}}
switch (n) {
case 111:
n += 111;
[[clang::fallthrough]];
case 112:
n += 112;
case 113: // expected-warning{{unannotated fall-through}} expected-note{{insert '[[clang::fallthrough]];' to silence this warning}} expected-note{{insert 'break;' to avoid fall-through}}
n += 113;
break ;
}
}
return n;
}
int fallthrough2(int n) {
switch (n / 10) {
case 0:
n += 100;
case 1: // no warning, as we didn't "opt-in" for it in this method
switch (n) {
case 111:
n += 111;
case 112: // no warning, as we didn't "opt-in" for it in this method
n += 112;
case 113: // no warning, as we didn't "opt-in" for it in this method
n += 113;
break ;
}
}
return n;
}
void unscoped(int n) {
switch (n % 2) {
case 0:
[[fallthrough]];
case 2:
[[clang::fallthrough]];
case 1:
break;
}
}