mirror of
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project.git
synced 2025-04-26 20:36:05 +00:00
6ed0fad999
Summary: It seems there isn't much enthusiasm for `-wtest` D45685. This is more conservative version, which i had in the very first revision of D44883, but that 'erroneously' got removed because of the review. **Based on some [irc] discussions, it must really be documented that we want all the new diagnostics to have their own flags, to ease rollouts, transitions, etc.** Please do note that i'm only adding `-Wno-self-assign-overloaded`, but not `-Wno-self-assign-field-overloaded`, because i'm honestly not aware of any false-positives from the `-field` variant, but i can just as easily add it if wanted. https://reviews.llvm.org/D44883#1068561 Reviewers: dblaikie, aaron.ballman, thakis, rjmccall, rsmith Reviewed By: dblaikie Subscribers: Quuxplusone, chandlerc, cfe-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45766 llvm-svn: 330651
19 lines
623 B
C++
19 lines
623 B
C++
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -Wall -verify %s
|
|
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -Wself-assign -verify %s
|
|
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -Wself-assign-overloaded -verify %s
|
|
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -Wall -Wno-self-assign-overloaded -DSILENCE -verify %s
|
|
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -Wself-assign -Wno-self-assign-overloaded -DSILENCE -verify %s
|
|
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -Wself-assign-overloaded -Wno-self-assign-overloaded -DSILENCE -verify %s
|
|
|
|
struct S {};
|
|
|
|
void f() {
|
|
S a;
|
|
#ifndef SILENCE
|
|
a = a; // expected-warning{{explicitly assigning}}
|
|
#else
|
|
// expected-no-diagnostics
|
|
a = a;
|
|
#endif
|
|
}
|