mirror of
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project.git
synced 2025-05-03 23:56:06 +00:00
31cbe0f240
C++98 and C++03 are effectively aliases as far as Clang is concerned. As such, allowing both std=c++98 and std=c++03 as Lit parameters is just slightly confusing, but provides no value. It's similar to allowing both std=c++17 and std=c++1z, which we don't do. This was discovered because we had an internal bot that ran the test suite under both c++98 AND c++03 -- one of which is redundant. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80926
32 lines
1.0 KiB
C++
32 lines
1.0 KiB
C++
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
|
|
//
|
|
// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions.
|
|
// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
|
|
// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception
|
|
//
|
|
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
|
|
// UNSUPPORTED: c++03, c++11, c++14, c++17
|
|
|
|
// <chrono>
|
|
|
|
// using weeks = duration<signed integer type of at least 22 bits, ratio_multiply<ratio<7>, days::period>>;
|
|
|
|
#include <chrono>
|
|
#include <type_traits>
|
|
#include <limits>
|
|
|
|
#include "test_macros.h"
|
|
|
|
int main(int, char**)
|
|
{
|
|
typedef std::chrono::weeks D;
|
|
typedef D::rep Rep;
|
|
typedef D::period Period;
|
|
static_assert(std::is_signed<Rep>::value, "");
|
|
static_assert(std::is_integral<Rep>::value, "");
|
|
static_assert(std::numeric_limits<Rep>::digits >= 22, "");
|
|
static_assert(std::is_same_v<Period, std::ratio_multiply<std::ratio<7>, std::chrono::days::period>>, "");
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
}
|