If a cmpxchg specifies acquire or seq_cst on failure, make sure we
generate code consistent with that ordering even if the success ordering
is not acquire/seq_cst.
At one point, it was ambiguous whether this sort of construct was valid,
but the C++ standad and LLVM now accept arbitrary combinations of
success/failure orderings.
This doesn't address the corresponding issue in AtomicExpand. (This was
reported as https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33332 .)
Fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50512.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103284
0b3b0a727a