llvm-project/clang/test/CodeGen/builtin-memfns.c
Sirraide 12f78e740c
[Clang] [NFC] Fix unintended -Wreturn-type warnings everywhere in the test suite (#123464)
In preparation of making `-Wreturn-type` default to an error (as there
is virtually no situation where you’d *want* to fall off the end of a
function that is supposed to return a value), this patch fixes tests
that have relied on this being only a warning, of which there seem 
to be 3 kinds:

1. Tests which for no apparent reason have a function that triggers the
warning.

I suspect that a lot of these were on accident (or from before the
warning was introduced), since a lot of people will open issues w/ their
problematic code in the `main` function (which is the one case where you
don’t need to return from a non-void function, after all...), which
someone will then copy, possibly into a namespace, possibly renaming it,
the end result of that being that you end up w/ something that
definitely is not `main` anymore, but which still is declared as
returning `int`, and which still has no return statement (another reason
why I think this might apply to a lot of these is because usually the
actual return type of such problematic functions is quite literally
`int`).
  
A lot of these are really old tests that don’t use `-verify`, which is
why no-one noticed or had to care about the extra warning that was
already being emitted by them until now.

2. Tests which test either `-Wreturn-type`, `[[noreturn]]`, or what
codegen and sanitisers do whenever you do fall off the end of a
function.

3. Tests where I struggle to figure out what is even being tested
(usually because they’re Objective-C tests, and I don’t know
Objective-C), whether falling off the end of a function matters in the
first place, and tests where actually spelling out an expression to
return would be rather cumbersome (e.g. matrix types currently don’t
support list initialisation, so I can’t write e.g. `return {}`).

For tests that fall into categories 2 and 3, I just added
`-Wno-error=return-type` to the `RUN` lines and called it a day. This
was especially necessary for the former since `-Wreturn-type` is an
analysis-based warning, meaning that it is currently impossible to test
for more than one occurrence of it in the same compilation if it
defaults to an error since the analysis pass is skipped for subsequent
functions as soon as an error is emitted.

I’ve also added `-Werror=return-type` to a few tests that I had already
updated as this patch was previously already making the warning an error
by default, but we’ve decided to split that into two patches instead.
2025-01-18 19:16:33 +01:00

126 lines
3.3 KiB
C

// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple i386-pc-linux-gnu -emit-llvm < %s| FileCheck %s
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple i386-pc-linux-gnu -emit-llvm -fexperimental-new-constant-interpreter < %s| FileCheck %s
typedef __WCHAR_TYPE__ wchar_t;
typedef __SIZE_TYPE__ size_t;
void *memcpy(void *, void const *, size_t);
void *memccpy(void *, void const *, int, size_t);
// CHECK: @test1
// CHECK: call void @llvm.memset.p0.i32
// CHECK: call void @llvm.memset.p0.i32
// CHECK: call void @llvm.memcpy.p0.p0.i32
// CHECK: call void @llvm.memmove.p0.p0.i32
// CHECK-NOT: __builtin
// CHECK: ret
int test1(int argc, char **argv) {
unsigned char a = 0x11223344;
unsigned char b = 0x11223344;
__builtin_bzero(&a, sizeof(a));
__builtin_memset(&a, 0, sizeof(a));
__builtin_memcpy(&a, &b, sizeof(a));
__builtin_memmove(&a, &b, sizeof(a));
return 0;
}
// CHECK: @test2
// CHECK: call void @llvm.memcpy.p0.p0.i32
char* test2(char* a, char* b) {
return __builtin_memcpy(a, b, 4);
}
// CHECK: @test3
// CHECK: call void @llvm.memset
void test3(char *P) {
__builtin___memset_chk(P, 42, 128, 128);
}
// CHECK: @test4
// CHECK: call void @llvm.memcpy
void test4(char *P, char *Q) {
__builtin___memcpy_chk(P, Q, 128, 128);
}
// CHECK: @test5
// CHECK: call void @llvm.memmove
void test5(char *P, char *Q) {
__builtin___memmove_chk(P, Q, 128, 128);
}
// CHECK: @test6
// CHECK: call void @llvm.memcpy
int test6(char *X) {
return __builtin___memcpy_chk(X, X, 42, 42) != 0;
}
// CHECK: @test7
// PR12094
void test7(int *p) {
struct snd_pcm_hw_params_t* hwparams; // incomplete type.
// CHECK: call void @llvm.memset{{.*}} align 4 {{.*}}256, i1 false)
__builtin_memset(p, 0, 256); // Should be alignment = 4
// CHECK: call void @llvm.memset{{.*}} align 1 {{.*}}256, i1 false)
__builtin_memset((char*)p, 0, 256); // Should be alignment = 1
__builtin_memset(hwparams, 0, 256); // No crash alignment = 1
// CHECK: call void @llvm.memset{{.*}} align 1{{.*}}256, i1 false)
}
// Make sure we don't over-estimate the alignment of fields of
// packed structs.
struct PS {
int modes[4];
} __attribute__((packed));
struct PS ps;
void test8(int *arg) {
// CHECK: @test8
// CHECK: call void @llvm.memcpy{{.*}} align 4 {{.*}} align 1 {{.*}} 16, i1 false)
__builtin_memcpy(arg, ps.modes, sizeof(struct PS));
}
__attribute((aligned(16))) int x[4], y[4];
void test9(void) {
// CHECK: @test9
// CHECK: call void @llvm.memcpy{{.*}} align 16 {{.*}} align 16 {{.*}} 16, i1 false)
__builtin_memcpy(x, y, sizeof(y));
}
wchar_t dest;
wchar_t src;
// CHECK-LABEL: @test10
// FIXME: Consider lowering these to llvm.memcpy / llvm.memmove.
void test10(void) {
// CHECK: call ptr @wmemcpy(ptr noundef @dest, ptr noundef @src, i32 noundef 4)
__builtin_wmemcpy(&dest, &src, 4);
// CHECK: call ptr @wmemmove(ptr noundef @dest, ptr noundef @src, i32 noundef 4)
__builtin_wmemmove(&dest, &src, 4);
}
// CHECK-LABEL: @test11
void test11(void) {
typedef struct { int a; } b;
int d;
b e;
// CHECK: call void @llvm.memcpy{{.*}}(
memcpy(&d, (char *)&e.a, sizeof(e));
}
// CHECK-LABEL: @test12
extern char dest_array[];
extern char src_array[];
void test12(void) {
// CHECK: call void @llvm.memcpy{{.*}}(
memcpy(&dest_array, &dest_array, 2);
}
// CHECK-LABEL: @test13
void test13(char *d, char *s, int c, size_t n) {
// CHECK: call ptr @memccpy
memccpy(d, s, c, n);
}