llvm-project/clang/test/CodeGenCXX/cxx11-user-defined-literal.cpp
Reid Kleckner 0d9919d362 Revert "[Clang] CWG1473: do not err on the lack of space after operator"""
This reverts commit f2583f3acf596cc545c8c0e3cb28e712f4ebf21b.

There is a large body of non-conforming C-like code using format strings
like this:

  #define PRIuS "zu"
  void h(size_t foo, size_t bar) {
    printf("foo is %"PRIuS", bar is %"PRIuS, foo, bar);
  }

Rejecting this code would be very disruptive. We could decide to do
that, but it's sufficiently disruptive that I think it requires
gathering more community consensus with an RFC, and Aaron indicated [1]
it's OK to revert for now so continuous testing systems can see past
this issue while we decide what to do.

[1] https://reviews.llvm.org/D153156#4607717
2023-08-22 18:10:41 -07:00

70 lines
2.8 KiB
C++

// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++11 -triple x86_64-linux-gnu -emit-llvm %s -o - | FileCheck %s
struct S { S(); ~S(); S(const S &); void operator()(int); };
using size_t = decltype(sizeof(int));
S operator"" _x(const char *, size_t);
S operator"" _y(wchar_t);
S operator"" _z(unsigned long long);
S operator"" _f(long double);
S operator"" _r(const char *);
template<char...Cs> S operator"" _t() { return S(); }
// CHECK: @[[s_foo:.*]] = {{.*}} constant [4 x i8] c"foo\00"
// CHECK: @[[s_bar:.*]] = {{.*}} constant [4 x i8] c"bar\00"
// CHECK: @[[s_123:.*]] = {{.*}} constant [4 x i8] c"123\00"
// CHECK: @[[s_4_9:.*]] = {{.*}} constant [4 x i8] c"4.9\00"
// CHECK: @[[s_0xffffeeee:.*]] = {{.*}} constant [11 x i8] c"0xffffeeee\00"
void f() {
// CHECK: call void @_Zli2_xPKcm({{.*}}, ptr noundef @[[s_foo]], i64 noundef 3)
// CHECK: call void @_Zli2_xPKcm({{.*}}, ptr noundef @[[s_bar]], i64 noundef 3)
// CHECK: call void @_Zli2_yw({{.*}} 97)
// CHECK: call void @_Zli2_zy({{.*}} 42)
// CHECK: call void @_Zli2_fe({{.*}} x86_fp80 noundef 0xK3FFF8000000000000000)
// CHECK: call void @_ZN1SD1Ev({{.*}})
// CHECK: call void @_ZN1SD1Ev({{.*}})
// CHECK: call void @_ZN1SD1Ev({{.*}})
// CHECK: call void @_ZN1SD1Ev({{.*}})
// CHECK: call void @_ZN1SD1Ev({{.*}})
"foo"_x, "bar"_x, L'a'_y, 42_z, 1.0_f;
// CHECK: call void @_Zli2_rPKc({{.*}}, ptr noundef @[[s_123]])
// CHECK: call void @_Zli2_rPKc({{.*}}, ptr noundef @[[s_4_9]])
// CHECK: call void @_Zli2_rPKc({{.*}}, ptr noundef @[[s_0xffffeeee]])
// CHECK: call void @_ZN1SD1Ev({{.*}})
// CHECK: call void @_ZN1SD1Ev({{.*}})
// CHECK: call void @_ZN1SD1Ev({{.*}})
123_r, 4.9_r, 0xffff\
eeee_r;
// FIXME: This mangling is insane. Maybe we should have a special case for
// char parameter packs?
// CHECK: call void @_Zli2_tIJLc48ELc120ELc49ELc50ELc51ELc52ELc53ELc54ELc55ELc56EEE1Sv({{.*}})
// CHECK: call void @_ZN1SD1Ev({{.*}})
0x12345678_t;
}
// CHECK: define {{.*}} @_Zli2_tIJLc48ELc120ELc49ELc50ELc51ELc52ELc53ELc54ELc55ELc56EEE1Sv(
template<typename T> auto g(T t) -> decltype("foo"_x(t)) { return "foo"_x(t); }
template<typename T> auto i(T t) -> decltype(operator"" _x("foo", 3)(t)) { return operator"" _x("foo", 3)(t); }
void h() {
g(42);
i(42);
}
// CHECK: define {{.*}} @_Z1hv()
// CHECK: call void @_Z1gIiEDTclclL_Zli2_xPKcmELA4_S0_ELm3EEfp_EET_(i32 noundef 42)
// CHECK: call void @_Z1iIiEDTclclL_Zli2_xPKcmELA4_S0_ELi3EEfp_EET_(i32 noundef 42)
// CHECK: define {{.*}} @_Z1gIiEDTclclL_Zli2_xPKcmELA4_S0_ELm3EEfp_EET_(i32
// CHECK: call void @_Zli2_xPKcm({{.*}}, ptr noundef @{{.*}}, i64 noundef 3)
// CHECK: call void @_ZN1SclEi
// CHECK: call void @_ZN1SD1Ev
// CHECK: define {{.*}} @_Z1iIiEDTclclL_Zli2_xPKcmELA4_S0_ELi3EEfp_EET_(i32
// CHECK: call void @_Zli2_xPKcm({{.*}}, ptr noundef @{{.*}}, i64 noundef 3)
// CHECK: call void @_ZN1SclEi
// CHECK: call void @_ZN1SD1Ev