David Majnemer 58e5bee17a MS ABI: Eliminate Duplicate Strings
COFF doesn't have mergeable sections so LLVM/clang's normal tactics for
string deduplication will not have any effect.

To remedy this we place each string inside it's own section and mark
the section as IMAGE_COMDAT_SELECT_ANY.  However, we can only do this if the
string has an external name that we can generate from it's contents.

To be compatible with MSVC, we must use their scheme.  Otherwise identical
strings in translation units from clang may not be deduplicated with
translation units in MSVC.

This fixes PR18248.

N.B. We will not attempt to do anything with a string literal which is not of
type 'char' or 'wchar_t' because their compiler does not support unicode
string literals as of this date.  Further, we avoid doing this if
either -fwritable-strings or -fsanitize=address are present.

This reverts commit r204596.

llvm-svn: 204675
2014-03-24 21:43:36 +00:00
..
2014-03-24 11:09:01 +00:00
2013-07-11 01:32:21 +00:00
2013-06-08 00:27:19 +00:00

IRgen optimization opportunities.

//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===//

The common pattern of
--
short x; // or char, etc
(x == 10)
--
generates an zext/sext of x which can easily be avoided.

//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===//

Bitfields accesses can be shifted to simplify masking and sign
extension. For example, if the bitfield width is 8 and it is
appropriately aligned then is is a lot shorter to just load the char
directly.

//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===//

It may be worth avoiding creation of alloca's for formal arguments
for the common situation where the argument is never written to or has
its address taken. The idea would be to begin generating code by using
the argument directly and if its address is taken or it is stored to
then generate the alloca and patch up the existing code.

In theory, the same optimization could be a win for block local
variables as long as the declaration dominates all statements in the
block.

NOTE: The main case we care about this for is for -O0 -g compile time
performance, and in that scenario we will need to emit the alloca
anyway currently to emit proper debug info. So this is blocked by
being able to emit debug information which refers to an LLVM
temporary, not an alloca.

//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===//

We should try and avoid generating basic blocks which only contain
jumps. At -O0, this penalizes us all the way from IRgen (malloc &
instruction overhead), all the way down through code generation and
assembly time.

On 176.gcc:expr.ll, it looks like over 12% of basic blocks are just
direct branches!

//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===//