llvm-project/clang/test/Parser/check-syntax-1.m
Richard Trieu 553b2b2e5d Modify how the -verify flag works. Currently, the verification string and
diagnostic message are compared.  If either is a substring of the other, then
no error is given.  This gives rise to an unexpected case:

  // expect-error{{candidate function has different number of parameters}}

will match the following error messages from Clang:

  candidate function has different number of parameters (expected 1 but has 2)
  candidate function has different number of parameters

It will also match these other error messages:

  candidate function
  function has different number of parameters
  number of parameters

This patch will change so that the verification string must be a substring of
the diagnostic message before accepting.  Also, all the failing tests from this
change have been corrected.  Some stats from this cleanup:

87 - removed extra spaces around verification strings
70 - wording updates to diagnostics
40 - extra leading or trailing characters (typos, unmatched parens or quotes)
35 - diagnostic level was included (error:, warning:, or note:)
18 - flag name put in the warning (-Wprotocol)

llvm-svn: 146619
2011-12-15 00:38:15 +00:00

20 lines
624 B
Objective-C

// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify %s
int @interface bla ; // expected-error {{cannot combine with previous 'int' declaration specifier}}
@end
typedef float CGFloat;
@interface XNSNumber
+ (XNSNumber *) numberWithCGFloat : (CGFloat) float; // expected-error {{expected identifier}} \
// expected-error {{expected ';' after method prototype}}
@end
// rdar: // 7822196
@interface A
(void) x; // expected-error {{method type specifier must start with '-' or '+'}}
(int)im; // expected-error {{method type specifier must start with '-' or '+'}} \
- ok;
@end