llvm-project/clang/test/Parser/cxx-ambig-init-templ.cpp
Richard Smith b3f6e3d6d6 Improve recovery from invalid template-ids.
Instead of bailing out of parsing when we encounter an invalid
template-name or template arguments in a template-id, produce an
annotation token describing the invalid construct.

This avoids duplicate errors and generally allows us to recover better.
In principle we should be able to extend this to store some kinds of
invalid template-id in the AST for tooling use, but that isn't handled
as part of this change.
2020-03-27 17:11:04 -07:00

191 lines
5.7 KiB
C++

// RUN: %clang_cc1 -Wno-uninitialized -std=c++11 -verify %s
template<int> struct c { c(int) = delete; typedef void val; operator int() const; };
int f;
int val;
int foobar;
struct S {
int k1 = a < b < c, d > ::val, e1;
int k2 = a < b, c < d > ::val, e2;
int k3 = b < a < c, d > ::val, e3;
int k4 = b < c, x, y = d > ::val, e4;
int k5 = T1 < b, &S::operator=(int); // expected-error {{extra qualification}}
int k6 = T2 < b, &S::operator= >::val;
int k7 = T1 < b, &S::operator>(int); // expected-error {{extra qualification}}
int k8 = T2 < b, &S::operator> >::val;
int k9 = T3 < a < b, c >> (d), e5 = 1 > (e4);
int k10 = 0 < T3 < a < b, c >> (d
) // expected-error {{expected ';' at end of declaration}}
, a > (e4);
int k11 = 0 < 1, c<3>::*ptr;
int k12 = e < 0, int a<b<c>::* >(), e11;
void f1(
int k1 = a < b < c, d > ::val,
int k2 = b < a < c, d > ::val,
int k3 = b < c, int x = 0 > ::val,
int k4 = a < b, T3 < int > >(), // expected-error {{must be an expression}}
int k5 = a < b, c < d > ::val,
int k6 = a < b, c < d > (n) // expected-error {{undeclared identifier 'n'}}
);
static void f1b(
int k6 = a < b, c < d > (f)
);
using f1b_T = decltype(f1b(0)); // only one parameter, because second param
// would be missing its default argument
void f2a(
// T3<int> here is a parameter type, so must be declared before it is used.
int k1 = c < b, T3 < int > x = 0 // expected-error {{no template named 'T3'}}
);
template<typename, int=0> struct T3 { T3(int); operator int(); };
void f2b(
int k1 = c < b, T3 < int > x = 0 // ok
);
// This is a one-parameter function. Ensure we don't typo-correct it to
// int = a < b, c < foobar > ()
// ... which would be a function with two parameters.
int f3(int = a < b, c < goobar > ());
static constexpr int (S::*f3_test)(int) = &S::f3;
void f4(
int k1 = a<1,2>::val,
int missing_default // expected-error {{missing default argument on parameter}}
);
void f5(
int k1 = b < c,
int missing_default // expected-error {{missing default argument on parameter}}
);
// FIXME: We should ideally disambiguate this as two parameters.
void f6(
int k = b < c, // expected-error {{unexpected end of default argument}}
unsigned int (missing_default)
);
template<int, int = 0> struct a { // expected-note {{here}}
a();
a(int);
static const int val = 0;
operator int();
};
static const int b = 0, c = 1, d = 2, goobar = 3;
template<int, typename> struct e { operator int(); };
static const int f = 0;
int mp1 = 0 < 1,
a<b<c,b<c>::*mp2,
mp3 = 0 > a<b<c>::val,
a<b<c,b<c>::*mp4 = 0,
a<b<c,b<c>::*mp5 {0},
a<b<c,b<c>::*mp6;
int np1 = e<0, int a<b<c,b<c>::*>();
static const int T1 = 4;
template<int, int &(S::*)(int)> struct T2 { static const int val = 0; };
};
namespace NoAnnotationTokens {
template<bool> struct Bool { Bool(int); };
static const bool in_class = false;
struct Test {
// Check we don't keep around a Bool<false> annotation token here.
int f(Bool<true> = X<Y, Bool<in_class> >(0));
// But it's OK if we do here.
int g(Bool<true> = Z<Y, Bool<in_class> = Bool<false>(0));
static const bool in_class = true;
template<int, typename U> using X = U;
static const int Y = 0, Z = 0;
};
}
namespace ImplicitInstantiation {
template<typename T> struct HasError { typename T::error error; }; // expected-error {{has no members}}
struct S {
// This triggers the instantiation of the outer HasError<int> during
// disambiguation, even though it uses the inner HasError<int>.
void f(int a = X<Y, HasError<int>::Z >()); // expected-note {{in instantiation of}}
template<typename, typename> struct X { operator int(); };
typedef int Y;
template<typename> struct HasError { typedef int Z; };
};
HasError<int> hei;
}
namespace CWG325 {
template <int A, typename B> struct T { static int i; operator int(); };
class C {
int Foo (int i = T<1, int>::i);
};
class D {
int Foo (int i = T<1, int>::i);
template <int A, typename B> struct T {static int i;};
};
const int a = 0;
typedef int b;
T<a,b> c;
struct E {
int n = T<a,b>(c);
};
}
namespace Operators {
struct Y {};
constexpr int operator,(const Y&, const Y&) { return 8; }
constexpr int operator>(const Y&, const Y&) { return 8; }
constexpr int operator<(const Y&, const Y&) { return 8; }
constexpr int operator>>(const Y&, const Y&) { return 8; }
struct X {
typedef int (*Fn)(const Y&, const Y&);
Fn a = operator,, b = operator<, c = operator>;
void f(Fn a = operator,, Fn b = operator<, Fn c = operator>);
int k1 = T1<0, operator<, operator>, operator<>::val, l1;
int k2 = T1<0, operator>, operator,, operator,>::val, l2;
int k3 = T2<0, operator,(Y{}, Y{}), operator<(Y{}, Y{})>::val, l3;
int k4 = T2<0, operator>(Y{}, Y{}), operator,(Y{}, Y{})>::val, l4;
int k5 = T3<0, operator>>>::val, l5;
int k6 = T4<0, T3<0, operator>>>>::val, l6;
template<int, Fn, Fn, Fn> struct T1 { enum { val }; };
template<int, int, int> struct T2 { enum { val }; };
template<int, Fn> struct T3 { enum { val }; };
template<int, typename T> struct T4 : T {};
};
}
namespace ElaboratedTypeSpecifiers {
struct S {
int f(int x = T<a, struct S>());
int h(int x = T<a, union __attribute__(()) U>());
int i(int x = T<a, enum E>());
int j(int x = T<a, struct S::template T<0, enum E>>());
template <int, typename> struct T { operator int(); };
static const int a = 0;
enum E {};
};
}
namespace PR20459 {
template <typename EncTraits> struct A {
void foo(int = EncTraits::template TypeEnc<int, int>::val); // ok
};
}