mirror of
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project.git
synced 2025-05-03 06:16:06 +00:00

This implements proposals from: - https://github.com/itanium-cxx-abi/cxx-abi/issues/24: mangling for constraints, requires-clauses, requires-expressions. - https://github.com/itanium-cxx-abi/cxx-abi/issues/31: requires-clauses and template parameters in a lambda expression are mangled into the <lambda-sig>. - https://github.com/itanium-cxx-abi/cxx-abi/issues/47 (STEP 3): mangling for template argument is prefixed by mangling of template parameter declaration if it's not "obvious", for example because the template parameter is constrained (we already implemented STEP 1 and STEP 2). This changes the manglings for a few cases: - Functions and function templates with constraints. - Function templates with template parameters with deduced types: `typename<auto N> void f();` - Function templates with template template parameters where the argument has a different template-head: `template<template<typename...T>> void f(); f<std::vector>();` In each case where a mangling changed, the change fixes a mangling collision. Note that only function templates are affected, not class templates or variable templates, and only new constructs (template parameters with deduced types, constrained templates) and esoteric constructs (templates with template template parameters with non-matching template template arguments, most of which Clang still does not accept by default due to `-frelaxed-template-template-args` not being enabled by default), so the risk to ABI stability from this change is relatively low. Nonetheless, `-fclang-abi-compat=17` can be used to restore the old manglings for cases which we could successfully but incorrectly mangle before. Fixes #48216, #49884, #61273 Reviewed By: erichkeane, #libc_abi Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D147655
196 lines
8.2 KiB
C++
196 lines
8.2 KiB
C++
//===- ExprCXX.cpp - (C++) Expression AST Node Implementation -------------===//
|
|
//
|
|
// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions.
|
|
// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
|
|
// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception
|
|
//
|
|
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
|
|
//
|
|
// This file implements the subclesses of Expr class declared in ExprCXX.h
|
|
//
|
|
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
|
|
|
|
#include "clang/AST/ExprConcepts.h"
|
|
#include "clang/AST/ASTConcept.h"
|
|
#include "clang/AST/ASTContext.h"
|
|
#include "clang/AST/ComputeDependence.h"
|
|
#include "clang/AST/Decl.h"
|
|
#include "clang/AST/DeclTemplate.h"
|
|
#include "clang/AST/DeclarationName.h"
|
|
#include "clang/AST/DependenceFlags.h"
|
|
#include "clang/AST/Expr.h"
|
|
#include "clang/AST/NestedNameSpecifier.h"
|
|
#include "clang/AST/TemplateBase.h"
|
|
#include "clang/AST/Type.h"
|
|
#include "clang/Basic/SourceLocation.h"
|
|
#include "llvm/Support/TrailingObjects.h"
|
|
#include <algorithm>
|
|
#include <string>
|
|
#include <utility>
|
|
|
|
using namespace clang;
|
|
|
|
ConceptSpecializationExpr::ConceptSpecializationExpr(
|
|
const ASTContext &C, ConceptReference *Loc,
|
|
ImplicitConceptSpecializationDecl *SpecDecl,
|
|
const ConstraintSatisfaction *Satisfaction)
|
|
: Expr(ConceptSpecializationExprClass, C.BoolTy, VK_PRValue, OK_Ordinary),
|
|
ConceptRef(Loc), SpecDecl(SpecDecl),
|
|
Satisfaction(Satisfaction
|
|
? ASTConstraintSatisfaction::Create(C, *Satisfaction)
|
|
: nullptr) {
|
|
setDependence(computeDependence(this, /*ValueDependent=*/!Satisfaction));
|
|
|
|
// Currently guaranteed by the fact concepts can only be at namespace-scope.
|
|
assert(!Loc->getNestedNameSpecifierLoc() ||
|
|
(!Loc->getNestedNameSpecifierLoc()
|
|
.getNestedNameSpecifier()
|
|
->isInstantiationDependent() &&
|
|
!Loc->getNestedNameSpecifierLoc()
|
|
.getNestedNameSpecifier()
|
|
->containsUnexpandedParameterPack()));
|
|
assert((!isValueDependent() || isInstantiationDependent()) &&
|
|
"should not be value-dependent");
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
ConceptSpecializationExpr::ConceptSpecializationExpr(EmptyShell Empty)
|
|
: Expr(ConceptSpecializationExprClass, Empty) {}
|
|
|
|
ConceptSpecializationExpr *
|
|
ConceptSpecializationExpr::Create(const ASTContext &C, ConceptReference *Loc,
|
|
ImplicitConceptSpecializationDecl *SpecDecl,
|
|
const ConstraintSatisfaction *Satisfaction) {
|
|
return new (C) ConceptSpecializationExpr(C, Loc, SpecDecl, Satisfaction);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
ConceptSpecializationExpr::ConceptSpecializationExpr(
|
|
const ASTContext &C, ConceptReference *Loc,
|
|
ImplicitConceptSpecializationDecl *SpecDecl,
|
|
const ConstraintSatisfaction *Satisfaction, bool Dependent,
|
|
bool ContainsUnexpandedParameterPack)
|
|
: Expr(ConceptSpecializationExprClass, C.BoolTy, VK_PRValue, OK_Ordinary),
|
|
ConceptRef(Loc), SpecDecl(SpecDecl),
|
|
Satisfaction(Satisfaction
|
|
? ASTConstraintSatisfaction::Create(C, *Satisfaction)
|
|
: nullptr) {
|
|
ExprDependence D = ExprDependence::None;
|
|
if (!Satisfaction)
|
|
D |= ExprDependence::Value;
|
|
if (Dependent)
|
|
D |= ExprDependence::Instantiation;
|
|
if (ContainsUnexpandedParameterPack)
|
|
D |= ExprDependence::UnexpandedPack;
|
|
setDependence(D);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
ConceptSpecializationExpr *
|
|
ConceptSpecializationExpr::Create(const ASTContext &C, ConceptReference *Loc,
|
|
ImplicitConceptSpecializationDecl *SpecDecl,
|
|
const ConstraintSatisfaction *Satisfaction,
|
|
bool Dependent,
|
|
bool ContainsUnexpandedParameterPack) {
|
|
return new (C)
|
|
ConceptSpecializationExpr(C, Loc, SpecDecl, Satisfaction, Dependent,
|
|
ContainsUnexpandedParameterPack);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
const TypeConstraint *
|
|
concepts::ExprRequirement::ReturnTypeRequirement::getTypeConstraint() const {
|
|
assert(isTypeConstraint());
|
|
auto TPL =
|
|
TypeConstraintInfo.getPointer().get<TemplateParameterList *>();
|
|
return cast<TemplateTypeParmDecl>(TPL->getParam(0))
|
|
->getTypeConstraint();
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Search through the requirements, and see if any have a RecoveryExpr in it,
|
|
// which means this RequiresExpr ALSO needs to be invalid.
|
|
static bool RequirementContainsError(concepts::Requirement *R) {
|
|
if (auto *ExprReq = dyn_cast<concepts::ExprRequirement>(R))
|
|
return ExprReq->getExpr() && ExprReq->getExpr()->containsErrors();
|
|
|
|
if (auto *NestedReq = dyn_cast<concepts::NestedRequirement>(R))
|
|
return !NestedReq->hasInvalidConstraint() &&
|
|
NestedReq->getConstraintExpr() &&
|
|
NestedReq->getConstraintExpr()->containsErrors();
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
RequiresExpr::RequiresExpr(ASTContext &C, SourceLocation RequiresKWLoc,
|
|
RequiresExprBodyDecl *Body, SourceLocation LParenLoc,
|
|
ArrayRef<ParmVarDecl *> LocalParameters,
|
|
SourceLocation RParenLoc,
|
|
ArrayRef<concepts::Requirement *> Requirements,
|
|
SourceLocation RBraceLoc)
|
|
: Expr(RequiresExprClass, C.BoolTy, VK_PRValue, OK_Ordinary),
|
|
NumLocalParameters(LocalParameters.size()),
|
|
NumRequirements(Requirements.size()), Body(Body), LParenLoc(LParenLoc),
|
|
RParenLoc(RParenLoc), RBraceLoc(RBraceLoc) {
|
|
RequiresExprBits.IsSatisfied = false;
|
|
RequiresExprBits.RequiresKWLoc = RequiresKWLoc;
|
|
bool Dependent = false;
|
|
bool ContainsUnexpandedParameterPack = false;
|
|
for (ParmVarDecl *P : LocalParameters) {
|
|
Dependent |= P->getType()->isInstantiationDependentType();
|
|
ContainsUnexpandedParameterPack |=
|
|
P->getType()->containsUnexpandedParameterPack();
|
|
}
|
|
RequiresExprBits.IsSatisfied = true;
|
|
for (concepts::Requirement *R : Requirements) {
|
|
Dependent |= R->isDependent();
|
|
ContainsUnexpandedParameterPack |= R->containsUnexpandedParameterPack();
|
|
if (!Dependent) {
|
|
RequiresExprBits.IsSatisfied = R->isSatisfied();
|
|
if (!RequiresExprBits.IsSatisfied)
|
|
break;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (RequirementContainsError(R))
|
|
setDependence(getDependence() | ExprDependence::Error);
|
|
}
|
|
std::copy(LocalParameters.begin(), LocalParameters.end(),
|
|
getTrailingObjects<ParmVarDecl *>());
|
|
std::copy(Requirements.begin(), Requirements.end(),
|
|
getTrailingObjects<concepts::Requirement *>());
|
|
RequiresExprBits.IsSatisfied |= Dependent;
|
|
// FIXME: move the computing dependency logic to ComputeDependence.h
|
|
if (ContainsUnexpandedParameterPack)
|
|
setDependence(getDependence() | ExprDependence::UnexpandedPack);
|
|
// FIXME: this is incorrect for cases where we have a non-dependent
|
|
// requirement, but its parameters are instantiation-dependent. RequiresExpr
|
|
// should be instantiation-dependent if it has instantiation-dependent
|
|
// parameters.
|
|
if (Dependent)
|
|
setDependence(getDependence() | ExprDependence::ValueInstantiation);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
RequiresExpr::RequiresExpr(ASTContext &C, EmptyShell Empty,
|
|
unsigned NumLocalParameters,
|
|
unsigned NumRequirements)
|
|
: Expr(RequiresExprClass, Empty), NumLocalParameters(NumLocalParameters),
|
|
NumRequirements(NumRequirements) { }
|
|
|
|
RequiresExpr *RequiresExpr::Create(
|
|
ASTContext &C, SourceLocation RequiresKWLoc, RequiresExprBodyDecl *Body,
|
|
SourceLocation LParenLoc, ArrayRef<ParmVarDecl *> LocalParameters,
|
|
SourceLocation RParenLoc, ArrayRef<concepts::Requirement *> Requirements,
|
|
SourceLocation RBraceLoc) {
|
|
void *Mem =
|
|
C.Allocate(totalSizeToAlloc<ParmVarDecl *, concepts::Requirement *>(
|
|
LocalParameters.size(), Requirements.size()),
|
|
alignof(RequiresExpr));
|
|
return new (Mem)
|
|
RequiresExpr(C, RequiresKWLoc, Body, LParenLoc, LocalParameters,
|
|
RParenLoc, Requirements, RBraceLoc);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
RequiresExpr *
|
|
RequiresExpr::Create(ASTContext &C, EmptyShell Empty,
|
|
unsigned NumLocalParameters, unsigned NumRequirements) {
|
|
void *Mem =
|
|
C.Allocate(totalSizeToAlloc<ParmVarDecl *, concepts::Requirement *>(
|
|
NumLocalParameters, NumRequirements),
|
|
alignof(RequiresExpr));
|
|
return new (Mem) RequiresExpr(C, Empty, NumLocalParameters, NumRequirements);
|
|
}
|