llvm-project/clang/lib/AST/ExprConcepts.cpp
Richard Smith 4b163e343c Implement mangling rules for C++20 concepts and requires-expressions.
This implements proposals from:

- https://github.com/itanium-cxx-abi/cxx-abi/issues/24: mangling for
  constraints, requires-clauses, requires-expressions.
- https://github.com/itanium-cxx-abi/cxx-abi/issues/31: requires-clauses and
  template parameters in a lambda expression are mangled into the <lambda-sig>.
- https://github.com/itanium-cxx-abi/cxx-abi/issues/47 (STEP 3): mangling for
  template argument is prefixed by mangling of template parameter declaration
  if it's not "obvious", for example because the template parameter is
  constrained (we already implemented STEP 1 and STEP 2).

This changes the manglings for a few cases:

- Functions and function templates with constraints.
- Function templates with template parameters with deduced types:
  `typename<auto N> void f();`
- Function templates with template template parameters where the argument has a
  different template-head:
  `template<template<typename...T>> void f(); f<std::vector>();`

In each case where a mangling changed, the change fixes a mangling collision.

Note that only function templates are affected, not class templates or variable
templates, and only new constructs (template parameters with deduced types,
constrained templates) and esoteric constructs (templates with template
template parameters with non-matching template template arguments, most of
which Clang still does not accept by default due to
`-frelaxed-template-template-args` not being enabled by default), so the risk
to ABI stability from this change is relatively low. Nonetheless,
`-fclang-abi-compat=17` can be used to restore the old manglings for cases
which we could successfully but incorrectly mangle before.

Fixes #48216, #49884, #61273

Reviewed By: erichkeane, #libc_abi

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D147655
2023-09-20 12:38:15 -07:00

196 lines
8.2 KiB
C++

//===- ExprCXX.cpp - (C++) Expression AST Node Implementation -------------===//
//
// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions.
// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception
//
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
//
// This file implements the subclesses of Expr class declared in ExprCXX.h
//
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
#include "clang/AST/ExprConcepts.h"
#include "clang/AST/ASTConcept.h"
#include "clang/AST/ASTContext.h"
#include "clang/AST/ComputeDependence.h"
#include "clang/AST/Decl.h"
#include "clang/AST/DeclTemplate.h"
#include "clang/AST/DeclarationName.h"
#include "clang/AST/DependenceFlags.h"
#include "clang/AST/Expr.h"
#include "clang/AST/NestedNameSpecifier.h"
#include "clang/AST/TemplateBase.h"
#include "clang/AST/Type.h"
#include "clang/Basic/SourceLocation.h"
#include "llvm/Support/TrailingObjects.h"
#include <algorithm>
#include <string>
#include <utility>
using namespace clang;
ConceptSpecializationExpr::ConceptSpecializationExpr(
const ASTContext &C, ConceptReference *Loc,
ImplicitConceptSpecializationDecl *SpecDecl,
const ConstraintSatisfaction *Satisfaction)
: Expr(ConceptSpecializationExprClass, C.BoolTy, VK_PRValue, OK_Ordinary),
ConceptRef(Loc), SpecDecl(SpecDecl),
Satisfaction(Satisfaction
? ASTConstraintSatisfaction::Create(C, *Satisfaction)
: nullptr) {
setDependence(computeDependence(this, /*ValueDependent=*/!Satisfaction));
// Currently guaranteed by the fact concepts can only be at namespace-scope.
assert(!Loc->getNestedNameSpecifierLoc() ||
(!Loc->getNestedNameSpecifierLoc()
.getNestedNameSpecifier()
->isInstantiationDependent() &&
!Loc->getNestedNameSpecifierLoc()
.getNestedNameSpecifier()
->containsUnexpandedParameterPack()));
assert((!isValueDependent() || isInstantiationDependent()) &&
"should not be value-dependent");
}
ConceptSpecializationExpr::ConceptSpecializationExpr(EmptyShell Empty)
: Expr(ConceptSpecializationExprClass, Empty) {}
ConceptSpecializationExpr *
ConceptSpecializationExpr::Create(const ASTContext &C, ConceptReference *Loc,
ImplicitConceptSpecializationDecl *SpecDecl,
const ConstraintSatisfaction *Satisfaction) {
return new (C) ConceptSpecializationExpr(C, Loc, SpecDecl, Satisfaction);
}
ConceptSpecializationExpr::ConceptSpecializationExpr(
const ASTContext &C, ConceptReference *Loc,
ImplicitConceptSpecializationDecl *SpecDecl,
const ConstraintSatisfaction *Satisfaction, bool Dependent,
bool ContainsUnexpandedParameterPack)
: Expr(ConceptSpecializationExprClass, C.BoolTy, VK_PRValue, OK_Ordinary),
ConceptRef(Loc), SpecDecl(SpecDecl),
Satisfaction(Satisfaction
? ASTConstraintSatisfaction::Create(C, *Satisfaction)
: nullptr) {
ExprDependence D = ExprDependence::None;
if (!Satisfaction)
D |= ExprDependence::Value;
if (Dependent)
D |= ExprDependence::Instantiation;
if (ContainsUnexpandedParameterPack)
D |= ExprDependence::UnexpandedPack;
setDependence(D);
}
ConceptSpecializationExpr *
ConceptSpecializationExpr::Create(const ASTContext &C, ConceptReference *Loc,
ImplicitConceptSpecializationDecl *SpecDecl,
const ConstraintSatisfaction *Satisfaction,
bool Dependent,
bool ContainsUnexpandedParameterPack) {
return new (C)
ConceptSpecializationExpr(C, Loc, SpecDecl, Satisfaction, Dependent,
ContainsUnexpandedParameterPack);
}
const TypeConstraint *
concepts::ExprRequirement::ReturnTypeRequirement::getTypeConstraint() const {
assert(isTypeConstraint());
auto TPL =
TypeConstraintInfo.getPointer().get<TemplateParameterList *>();
return cast<TemplateTypeParmDecl>(TPL->getParam(0))
->getTypeConstraint();
}
// Search through the requirements, and see if any have a RecoveryExpr in it,
// which means this RequiresExpr ALSO needs to be invalid.
static bool RequirementContainsError(concepts::Requirement *R) {
if (auto *ExprReq = dyn_cast<concepts::ExprRequirement>(R))
return ExprReq->getExpr() && ExprReq->getExpr()->containsErrors();
if (auto *NestedReq = dyn_cast<concepts::NestedRequirement>(R))
return !NestedReq->hasInvalidConstraint() &&
NestedReq->getConstraintExpr() &&
NestedReq->getConstraintExpr()->containsErrors();
return false;
}
RequiresExpr::RequiresExpr(ASTContext &C, SourceLocation RequiresKWLoc,
RequiresExprBodyDecl *Body, SourceLocation LParenLoc,
ArrayRef<ParmVarDecl *> LocalParameters,
SourceLocation RParenLoc,
ArrayRef<concepts::Requirement *> Requirements,
SourceLocation RBraceLoc)
: Expr(RequiresExprClass, C.BoolTy, VK_PRValue, OK_Ordinary),
NumLocalParameters(LocalParameters.size()),
NumRequirements(Requirements.size()), Body(Body), LParenLoc(LParenLoc),
RParenLoc(RParenLoc), RBraceLoc(RBraceLoc) {
RequiresExprBits.IsSatisfied = false;
RequiresExprBits.RequiresKWLoc = RequiresKWLoc;
bool Dependent = false;
bool ContainsUnexpandedParameterPack = false;
for (ParmVarDecl *P : LocalParameters) {
Dependent |= P->getType()->isInstantiationDependentType();
ContainsUnexpandedParameterPack |=
P->getType()->containsUnexpandedParameterPack();
}
RequiresExprBits.IsSatisfied = true;
for (concepts::Requirement *R : Requirements) {
Dependent |= R->isDependent();
ContainsUnexpandedParameterPack |= R->containsUnexpandedParameterPack();
if (!Dependent) {
RequiresExprBits.IsSatisfied = R->isSatisfied();
if (!RequiresExprBits.IsSatisfied)
break;
}
if (RequirementContainsError(R))
setDependence(getDependence() | ExprDependence::Error);
}
std::copy(LocalParameters.begin(), LocalParameters.end(),
getTrailingObjects<ParmVarDecl *>());
std::copy(Requirements.begin(), Requirements.end(),
getTrailingObjects<concepts::Requirement *>());
RequiresExprBits.IsSatisfied |= Dependent;
// FIXME: move the computing dependency logic to ComputeDependence.h
if (ContainsUnexpandedParameterPack)
setDependence(getDependence() | ExprDependence::UnexpandedPack);
// FIXME: this is incorrect for cases where we have a non-dependent
// requirement, but its parameters are instantiation-dependent. RequiresExpr
// should be instantiation-dependent if it has instantiation-dependent
// parameters.
if (Dependent)
setDependence(getDependence() | ExprDependence::ValueInstantiation);
}
RequiresExpr::RequiresExpr(ASTContext &C, EmptyShell Empty,
unsigned NumLocalParameters,
unsigned NumRequirements)
: Expr(RequiresExprClass, Empty), NumLocalParameters(NumLocalParameters),
NumRequirements(NumRequirements) { }
RequiresExpr *RequiresExpr::Create(
ASTContext &C, SourceLocation RequiresKWLoc, RequiresExprBodyDecl *Body,
SourceLocation LParenLoc, ArrayRef<ParmVarDecl *> LocalParameters,
SourceLocation RParenLoc, ArrayRef<concepts::Requirement *> Requirements,
SourceLocation RBraceLoc) {
void *Mem =
C.Allocate(totalSizeToAlloc<ParmVarDecl *, concepts::Requirement *>(
LocalParameters.size(), Requirements.size()),
alignof(RequiresExpr));
return new (Mem)
RequiresExpr(C, RequiresKWLoc, Body, LParenLoc, LocalParameters,
RParenLoc, Requirements, RBraceLoc);
}
RequiresExpr *
RequiresExpr::Create(ASTContext &C, EmptyShell Empty,
unsigned NumLocalParameters, unsigned NumRequirements) {
void *Mem =
C.Allocate(totalSizeToAlloc<ParmVarDecl *, concepts::Requirement *>(
NumLocalParameters, NumRequirements),
alignof(RequiresExpr));
return new (Mem) RequiresExpr(C, Empty, NumLocalParameters, NumRequirements);
}