The order of dbg.value intrinsics appearing in the output can affect the
order of tables in DWARF sections. This means that DPValues, our
dbg.value replacement, needs to obey the same ordering rules. For
dbg.values returned by findDbgUsers it's reverse order of creation (due
to how they're put on use-lists). Produce that order from findDbgUsers
for DPValues.
I've got a few IR files where the order of dbg.values flips, but it's a
fragile test -- ultimately it needs the number of times a DPValue is
handled by findDbgValues to be odd.
600c12987e