mirror of
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project.git
synced 2025-04-17 03:16:37 +00:00

I believe this is what the original commit (33e022650adee965c65f9aea086ee74f3fd1bad5) was trying to do. This fixes a bug where clang removes the attribute from a declaration that follows a declaration directly contained in a linkage-specification. rdar://61865848
66 lines
3.2 KiB
C++
66 lines
3.2 KiB
C++
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple x86_64-pc-linux-gnu -fsyntax-only -verify -std=c++11 %s
|
|
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple x86_64-pc-linux-gnu -fsyntax-only -verify -std=c++11 %s -fexperimental-new-constant-interpreter
|
|
|
|
static int test0 __attribute__((weak)); // expected-error {{weak declaration cannot have internal linkage}}
|
|
static void test1() __attribute__((weak)); // expected-error {{weak declaration cannot have internal linkage}}
|
|
|
|
namespace test2 __attribute__((weak)) { // expected-warning {{'weak' attribute only applies to variables, functions, and classes}}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
namespace {
|
|
int test3 __attribute__((weak)); // expected-error {{weak declaration cannot have internal linkage}}
|
|
void test4() __attribute__((weak)); // expected-error {{weak declaration cannot have internal linkage}}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
struct Test5 {
|
|
static void test5() __attribute__((weak)); // no error
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
namespace {
|
|
struct Test6 {
|
|
static void test6() __attribute__((weak)); // expected-error {{weak declaration cannot have internal linkage}}
|
|
};
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// GCC rejects the instantiation with the internal type, but some existing
|
|
// code expects it. It is also not that different from giving hidden visibility
|
|
// to parts of a template that have explicit default visibility, so we accept
|
|
// this.
|
|
template <class T> struct Test7 {
|
|
void test7() __attribute__((weak)) {}
|
|
static int var __attribute__((weak));
|
|
};
|
|
template <class T>
|
|
int Test7<T>::var;
|
|
namespace { class Internal {}; }
|
|
template struct Test7<Internal>;
|
|
template struct Test7<int>;
|
|
|
|
class __attribute__((weak)) Test8 {}; // OK
|
|
|
|
__attribute__((weak)) auto Test9 = Internal(); // expected-error {{weak declaration cannot have internal linkage}}
|
|
|
|
[[gnu::weak]] void weak_function();
|
|
struct WithWeakMember {
|
|
[[gnu::weak]] void weak_method();
|
|
[[gnu::weak]] virtual void virtual_weak_method();
|
|
};
|
|
constexpr bool weak_function_is_non_null = &weak_function != nullptr; // expected-error {{must be initialized by a constant expression}}
|
|
// expected-note@-1 {{comparison against address of weak declaration '&weak_function' can only be performed at runtime}}
|
|
constexpr bool weak_method_is_non_null = &WithWeakMember::weak_method != nullptr; // expected-error {{must be initialized by a constant expression}}
|
|
// expected-note@-1 {{comparison against pointer to weak member 'WithWeakMember::weak_method' can only be performed at runtime}}
|
|
// GCC accepts this and says the result is always non-null. That's consistent
|
|
// with the ABI rules for member pointers, but seems unprincipled, so we do not
|
|
// follow it for now.
|
|
// TODO: Consider warning on such comparisons, as they do not test whether the
|
|
// virtual member function is present.
|
|
constexpr bool virtual_weak_method_is_non_null = &WithWeakMember::virtual_weak_method != nullptr; // expected-error {{must be initialized by a constant expression}}
|
|
// expected-note@-1 {{comparison against pointer to weak member 'WithWeakMember::virtual_weak_method' can only be performed at runtime}}
|
|
|
|
// Check that no warnings are emitted.
|
|
extern "C" int g0;
|
|
extern int g0 __attribute__((weak_import));
|
|
|
|
extern "C" int g1 = 0; // expected-note {{previous definition is here}}
|
|
extern int g1 __attribute__((weak_import)); // expected-warning {{attribute declaration must precede definition}}
|