llvm-project/clang/test/SemaCXX/coroutine-uninitialized-warning-crash.cpp
Chuanqi Xu ec117158a3 [Coroutines] [Frontend] Lookup in std namespace first
Now in libcxx and clang, all the coroutine components are defined in
std::experimental namespace.
And now the coroutine TS is merged into C++20. So in the working draft
like N4892, we could find the coroutine components is defined in std
namespace instead of std::experimental namespace.
And the coroutine support in clang seems to be relatively stable. So I
think it may be suitable to move the coroutine component into the
experiment namespace now.

This patch would make clang lookup coroutine_traits in std namespace
first. For the compatibility consideration, clang would lookup in
std::experimental namespace if it can't find definitions in std
namespace. So the existing codes wouldn't be break after update
compiler.

And in case the compiler found std::coroutine_traits and
std::experimental::coroutine_traits at the same time, it would emit an
error for it.

The support for looking up std::experimental::coroutine_traits would be
removed in Clang16.

Reviewed By: lxfind, Quuxplusone

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108696
2021-11-04 11:53:47 +08:00

44 lines
862 B
C++

// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple x86_64-apple-darwin9 %s -std=c++20 -fsyntax-only -Wall -Wextra -Wuninitialized -fblocks
#include "Inputs/std-coroutine.h"
using namespace std;
struct A {
bool await_ready() { return true; }
int await_resume() { return 42; }
template <typename F>
void await_suspend(F) {}
};
struct coro_t {
struct promise_type {
coro_t get_return_object() { return {}; }
suspend_never initial_suspend() { return {}; }
suspend_never final_suspend() noexcept { return {}; }
A yield_value(int) { return {}; }
void return_void() {}
static void unhandled_exception() {}
};
};
coro_t f(int n) {
if (n == 0)
co_return;
co_yield 42;
int x = co_await A{};
}
template <class Await>
coro_t g(int n) {
if (n == 0)
co_return;
co_yield 42;
int x = co_await Await{};
}
int main() {
f(0);
g<A>(0);
}