mirror of
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project.git
synced 2025-04-17 22:16:46 +00:00
7607fce112
Without this patch, record decls with invalid out-of-line method delcs would sometimes be marked invalid, but not always. With this patch, they are consistently never marked invalid. (The code to do this was added in http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/cfe-commits/Week-of-Mon-20100809/033154.html , but the test from that revision is still passing.) As far as I can tell, this was the only place where a class was marked invalid after its definition was complete. llvm-svn: 197848
30 lines
1.1 KiB
C++
30 lines
1.1 KiB
C++
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify -std=c++11 %s
|
|
// Don't crash (PR13394).
|
|
|
|
namespace stretch_v1 {
|
|
struct closure_t {
|
|
const stretch_v1::ops_t* d_methods; // expected-error {{no type named 'ops_t' in namespace 'stretch_v1'}}
|
|
};
|
|
}
|
|
namespace gatekeeper_v1 {
|
|
namespace gatekeeper_factory_v1 {
|
|
struct closure_t { // expected-note {{'closure_t' declared here}} expected-note {{'gatekeeper_factory_v1::closure_t' declared here}}
|
|
gatekeeper_v1::closure_t* create(); // expected-error {{no type named 'closure_t' in namespace 'gatekeeper_v1'; did you mean simply 'closure_t'?}}
|
|
};
|
|
}
|
|
// FIXME: Typo correction should remove the 'gatekeeper_v1::' name specifier
|
|
gatekeeper_v1::closure_t *x; // expected-error {{no type named 'closure_t' in namespace 'gatekeeper_v1'; did you mean 'gatekeeper_factory_v1::closure_t'}}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
namespace Foo {
|
|
struct Base {
|
|
void Bar() {} // expected-note{{'Bar' declared here}}
|
|
};
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
struct Derived : public Foo::Base {
|
|
void test() {
|
|
Foo::Bar(); // expected-error{{no member named 'Bar' in namespace 'Foo'; did you mean simply 'Bar'?}}
|
|
}
|
|
};
|