llvm-project/clang/test/SemaCXX/static-data-member.cpp
Fangrui Song 83ea47acd7 [test] Make tests pass regardless of gnu++14/gnu++17 default
GCC from 11 onwards defaults to -std=gnu++17 for C++ source files. We want to do the same
(https://discourse.llvm.org/t/c-objc-switch-to-gnu-17-as-the-default-dialect/64360).
Split RUN lines, adjust `-verify`, or add `__cplusplus < 201703L` or `-Wno-dynamic-exception-spec`,
so that tests will pass regardless of gnu++14/gnu++17 default.

We have a desire to mark a test compatible with multiple language standards.
There are ongoing discussions how to add markers in the long term:

* https://discourse.llvm.org/t/iterating-lit-run-lines/62596
* https://discourse.llvm.org/t/lit-run-a-run-line-multiple-times-with-different-replacements/64932

As a workaround in the short term, add lit substitutions `%std_cxx98-`,
`%std_cxx11-14`, etc. They can be used for tests which work across multiple
language standards. If a range has `n` standards, run lit multiple times, with
`LIT_CLANG_STD_GROUP=0`, `LIT_CLANG_STD_GROUP=1`, etc to cover all `n` standards.

Reviewed By: #clang-language-wg, aaron.ballman

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131464
2022-09-04 05:29:32 +00:00

20 lines
811 B
C++

// RUN: %clang_cc1 %std_cxx98- -fsyntax-only -verify -w %s
struct ABC {
static double a;
static double b;
static double c;
static double d;
static double e;
static double f;
};
double ABC::a = 1.0;
extern double ABC::b = 1.0; // expected-error {{static data member definition cannot specify a storage class}}
static double ABC::c = 1.0; // expected-error {{'static' can only be specified inside the class definition}}
__private_extern__ double ABC::d = 1.0; // expected-error {{static data member definition cannot specify a storage class}}
auto double ABC::e = 1.0; // expected-error {{static data member definition cannot specify a storage class}}
#if __cplusplus < 201703L
register double ABC::f = 1.0; // expected-error {{static data member definition cannot specify a storage class}}
#endif