llvm-project/clang/test/SemaOpenACC/combined-construct-self-clause.c
erichkeane fa20b5d30d [OpenACC] 'if' and 'self' clause implementation for Combined Constructs
These two are identical to how they work for compute constructs, so this
patch enables them and ensures there is sufficient testing.
2024-11-13 12:42:53 -08:00

87 lines
3.1 KiB
C

// RUN: %clang_cc1 %s -fopenacc -verify
void BoolExpr(int *I, float *F) {
typedef struct {} SomeStruct;
struct C{};
// expected-error@+1{{expected expression}}
#pragma acc parallel loop self (struct C f())
for (unsigned i = 0; i < 5; ++i);
// expected-error@+1{{unexpected type name 'SomeStruct': expected expression}}
#pragma acc serial loop self (SomeStruct)
for (unsigned i = 0; i < 5; ++i);
// expected-error@+1{{unexpected type name 'SomeStruct': expected expression}}
#pragma acc kernels loop self (SomeStruct())
for (unsigned i = 0; i < 5; ++i);
SomeStruct S;
// expected-error@+1{{statement requires expression of scalar type ('SomeStruct' invalid)}}
#pragma acc parallel loop self (S)
for (unsigned i = 0; i < 5; ++i);
#pragma acc parallel loop self (I)
for (unsigned i = 0; i < 5; ++i);
#pragma acc serial loop self (F)
for (unsigned i = 0; i < 5; ++i);
#pragma acc kernels loop self (*I < *F)
for (unsigned i = 0; i < 5; ++i);
}
void WarnMaybeNotUsed(int val1, int val2) {
// expected-warning@+2{{OpenACC construct 'self' has no effect when an 'if' clause evaluates to true}}
// expected-note@+1{{previous clause is here}}
#pragma acc parallel loop self if(val1)
for (unsigned i = 0; i < 5; ++i);
// expected-warning@+2{{OpenACC construct 'self' has no effect when an 'if' clause evaluates to true}}
// expected-note@+1{{previous clause is here}}
#pragma acc serial loop self(val1) if(val1)
for (unsigned i = 0; i < 5; ++i);
// expected-warning@+2{{OpenACC construct 'self' has no effect when an 'if' clause evaluates to true}}
// expected-note@+1{{previous clause is here}}
#pragma acc kernels loop if(val1) self
for (unsigned i = 0; i < 5; ++i);
// expected-warning@+2{{OpenACC construct 'self' has no effect when an 'if' clause evaluates to true}}
// expected-note@+1{{previous clause is here}}
#pragma acc parallel loop if(val1) self(val2)
for (unsigned i = 0; i < 5; ++i);
// The below don't warn because one side or the other has an error, thus is
// not added to the AST.
// expected-error@+1{{use of undeclared identifier 'invalid'}}
#pragma acc serial loop self if(invalid)
for (unsigned i = 0; i < 5; ++i);
// expected-error@+1{{use of undeclared identifier 'invalid'}}
#pragma acc kernels loop self(invalid) if(val1)
for (unsigned i = 0; i < 5; ++i);
// expected-error@+2{{expected expression}}
// expected-error@+1{{use of undeclared identifier 'invalid'}}
#pragma acc parallel loop self() if(invalid)
for (unsigned i = 0; i < 5; ++i);
// expected-error@+1{{use of undeclared identifier 'invalid'}}
#pragma acc serial loop if(invalid) self
for (unsigned i = 0; i < 5; ++i);
// expected-error@+1{{use of undeclared identifier 'invalid'}}
#pragma acc kernels loop if(val2) self(invalid)
for (unsigned i = 0; i < 5; ++i);
// expected-error@+1{{use of undeclared identifier 'invalid'}}
#pragma acc parallel loop if(invalid) self(val1)
for (unsigned i = 0; i < 5; ++i);
// expected-error@+1{{OpenACC 'self' clause is not valid on 'loop' directive}}
#pragma acc loop self
for(int i = 5; i < 10;++i);
}