llvm-project/clang/test/Analysis/builtin_bitcast.cpp
Balazs Benics aa454dda2e [analyzer] LValueToRValueBitCasts should evaluate to an r-value
Previously `LValueToRValueBitCast`s were modeled in the same way how
a regular `BitCast` was. However, this should not produce an l-value.
Modeling bitcasts accurately is tricky, so it's probably better to
model this expression by binding a fresh conjured value.

The following code should not result in a diagnostic:
```lang=C++
  __attribute__((always_inline))
  static inline constexpr unsigned int_castf32_u32(float __A) {
    return __builtin_bit_cast(unsigned int, __A); // no-warning
  }
```

Previously, it reported
`Address of stack memory associated with local variable '__A' returned
to caller [core.StackAddressEscape]`.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105017

Reviewed by: NoQ, vsavchenko
2021-07-01 10:54:22 +02:00

33 lines
1.0 KiB
C++

// RUN: %clang_analyze_cc1 -triple x86_64-unknown-unknown -verify %s \
// RUN: -analyzer-checker=core,debug.ExprInspection
template <typename T> void clang_analyzer_dump(T);
__attribute__((always_inline)) static inline constexpr unsigned int _castf32_u32(float __A) {
return __builtin_bit_cast(unsigned int, __A); // no-warning
}
void test(int i) {
_castf32_u32(42);
float f = 42;
// Loading from a floating point value results in unknown,
// which later materializes as a conjured value.
auto g = __builtin_bit_cast(unsigned int, f);
clang_analyzer_dump(g);
// expected-warning-re@-1 {{{{^conj_\$[0-9]+{unsigned int,}}}}
auto g2 = __builtin_bit_cast(unsigned int, 42.0f);
clang_analyzer_dump(g2);
// expected-warning-re@-1 {{{{^conj_\$[0-9]+{unsigned int,}}}}
auto g3 = __builtin_bit_cast(unsigned int, i);
clang_analyzer_dump(g3);
// expected-warning-re@-1 {{{{^reg_\$[0-9]+<int i>}}}}
auto g4 = __builtin_bit_cast(unsigned long, &i);
clang_analyzer_dump(g4);
// expected-warning@-1 {{&i [as 64 bit integer]}}
}