llvm-project/clang/test/SemaCXX/implicit-exception-spec.cpp
Richard Smith b3f6e3d6d6 Improve recovery from invalid template-ids.
Instead of bailing out of parsing when we encounter an invalid
template-name or template arguments in a template-id, produce an
annotation token describing the invalid construct.

This avoids duplicate errors and generally allows us to recover better.
In principle we should be able to extend this to store some kinds of
invalid template-id in the AST for tooling use, but that isn't handled
as part of this change.
2020-03-27 17:11:04 -07:00

151 lines
5.1 KiB
C++

// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -fcxx-exceptions -verify -std=c++11 -Wall -Wno-unused-local-typedefs %s
template<bool b> struct ExceptionIf { static int f(); };
template<> struct ExceptionIf<false> { typedef int f; };
// The exception specification of a defaulted default constructor depends on
// the contents of in-class member initializers. However, the in-class member
// initializers can depend on the exception specification of the constructor,
// since the class is considered complete within them. We reject any such cases.
namespace InClassInitializers {
// Noexcept::Noexcept() is implicitly declared as noexcept(false), because it
// directly invokes ThrowSomething(). However...
//
// If noexcept(Noexcept()) is false, then Noexcept() is a constant expression,
// so noexcept(Noexcept()) is true. But if noexcept(Noexcept()) is true, then
// Noexcept::Noexcept is not declared constexpr, therefore noexcept(Noexcept())
// is false.
bool ThrowSomething() noexcept(false);
struct ConstExpr { // expected-error {{default member initializer for 'b' needed}}
bool b = // expected-note {{declared here}}
noexcept(ConstExpr()) && ThrowSomething(); // expected-note {{in evaluation of exception spec}}
};
// Much more obviously broken: we can't parse the initializer without already
// knowing whether it produces a noexcept expression.
struct TemplateArg { // expected-error {{default member initializer for 'n' needed}}
int n = // expected-note {{declared here}}
ExceptionIf<noexcept(TemplateArg())>::f(); // expected-note {{in evaluation of exception spec}}
};
// And within a nested class.
struct Nested {
struct Inner { // expected-error {{default member initializer for 'n' needed}}
int n = // expected-note {{declared here}}
ExceptionIf<noexcept(Nested())>::f(); // expected-note {{in evaluation of exception spec}}
} inner; // expected-note {{in evaluation of exception spec}}
};
struct Nested2 {
struct Inner;
int n = Inner().n; // expected-note {{in evaluation of exception spec}}
struct Inner { // expected-error {{initializer for 'n' needed}}
int n = ExceptionIf<noexcept(Nested2())>::f(); // expected-note {{declared here}}
} inner;
};
}
namespace ExceptionSpecification {
struct Nested {
struct T {
T() noexcept(!noexcept(Nested())); // expected-note {{in evaluation of exception spec}}
} t; // expected-error{{exception specification is not available until end of class definition}}
};
}
namespace DefaultArgument {
struct Default {
struct T {
T(int = ExceptionIf<noexcept(Default())::f()); // expected-error {{call to implicitly-deleted default constructor}} expected-error {{expected '>'}}
} t; // expected-note {{has no default constructor}}
};
}
namespace ImplicitDtorExceptionSpec {
struct A {
virtual ~A();
struct Inner {
~Inner() throw();
};
Inner inner;
};
struct B {
virtual ~B() {} // expected-note {{here}}
};
struct C : B {
virtual ~C() {}
A a;
};
struct D : B {
~D(); // expected-error {{more lax than base}}
struct E {
~E();
struct F {
~F() throw(A);
} f;
} e;
};
}
struct nothrow_t {} nothrow;
void *operator new(decltype(sizeof(0)), nothrow_t) noexcept;
namespace PotentiallyConstructed {
template<bool NE> struct A {
A() noexcept(NE);
A(const A&) noexcept(NE);
A(A&&) noexcept(NE);
A &operator=(const A&) noexcept(NE);
A &operator=(A&&) noexcept(NE);
~A() noexcept(NE);
};
template<bool NE> struct B : virtual A<NE> {};
template<bool NE> struct C : virtual A<NE> {
virtual void f() = 0; // expected-note 2{{unimplemented}}
};
template<bool NE> struct D final : C<NE> {
void f();
};
template<typename T, bool A, bool B, bool C, bool D, bool E, bool F> void check() {
T *p = nullptr;
T &a = *p;
static_assert(noexcept(a = a) == D, "");
static_assert(noexcept(a = static_cast<T&&>(a)) == E, "");
static_assert(noexcept(delete &a) == F, "");
// These are last because the first failure here causes instantiation to bail out.
static_assert(noexcept(new (nothrow) T()) == A, ""); // expected-error 2{{abstract}}
static_assert(noexcept(new (nothrow) T(a)) == B, "");
static_assert(noexcept(new (nothrow) T(static_cast<T&&>(a))) == C, "");
}
template void check<A<false>, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0>();
template void check<A<true >, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1>();
template void check<B<false>, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0>();
template void check<B<true >, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1>();
template void check<C<false>, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0>(); // expected-note {{instantiation}}
template void check<C<true >, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1>(); // expected-note {{instantiation}}
template void check<D<false>, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0>();
template void check<D<true >, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1>();
// ... the above trick doesn't work for this case...
struct Cfalse : virtual A<false> {
virtual void f() = 0;
Cfalse() noexcept;
Cfalse(const Cfalse&) noexcept;
Cfalse(Cfalse&&) noexcept;
};
Cfalse::Cfalse() noexcept = default;
Cfalse::Cfalse(const Cfalse&) noexcept = default;
Cfalse::Cfalse(Cfalse&&) noexcept = default;
}