David Majnemer d536f2328e [ConstnatFolding] Teach the folder how to fold ConstantVector
A ConstantVector can have ConstantExpr operands and vice versa.
However, the folder had no ability to fold ConstantVectors which, in
some cases, was an optimization barrier.

Instead, rephrase the folder in terms of Constants instead of
ConstantExprs and teach callers how to deal with failure.

llvm-svn: 277099
2016-07-29 03:27:26 +00:00
..
2016-07-28 23:31:12 +00:00
2016-04-18 09:17:29 +00:00
2016-07-28 23:31:12 +00:00
2016-03-08 20:53:48 +00:00
2016-04-18 09:17:29 +00:00
2016-07-19 17:50:24 +00:00
2016-07-07 16:19:09 +00:00
2016-06-28 17:19:10 +00:00
2016-04-18 09:17:29 +00:00
2016-07-27 20:22:21 +00:00

Analysis Opportunities:

//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===//

In test/Transforms/LoopStrengthReduce/quadradic-exit-value.ll, the
ScalarEvolution expression for %r is this:

  {1,+,3,+,2}<loop>

Outside the loop, this could be evaluated simply as (%n * %n), however
ScalarEvolution currently evaluates it as

  (-2 + (2 * (trunc i65 (((zext i64 (-2 + %n) to i65) * (zext i64 (-1 + %n) to i65)) /u 2) to i64)) + (3 * %n))

In addition to being much more complicated, it involves i65 arithmetic,
which is very inefficient when expanded into code.

//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===//

In formatValue in test/CodeGen/X86/lsr-delayed-fold.ll,

ScalarEvolution is forming this expression:

((trunc i64 (-1 * %arg5) to i32) + (trunc i64 %arg5 to i32) + (-1 * (trunc i64 undef to i32)))

This could be folded to

(-1 * (trunc i64 undef to i32))

//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===//