Stephan T. Lavavej c255fa5e93 [libcxx] [test] Fix MSVC warning C4244 "conversion from 'X' to 'Y', possible loss of data", part 2/7.
These tests for some guy's transparent operator functors were needlessly truncating their
double results to int. Preserving the doubleness makes compilers happier. I'm following
existing practice by adding an "// exact in binary" comment when the result isn't a whole number.
(The changes from 6 to 6.0 and so forth are stylistic, not critical.)

Fixes D27539.

llvm-svn: 289106
2016-12-08 21:38:01 +00:00

42 lines
1.1 KiB
C++

//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
//
// The LLVM Compiler Infrastructure
//
// This file is dual licensed under the MIT and the University of Illinois Open
// Source Licenses. See LICENSE.TXT for details.
//
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
// <functional>
// plus
#include <functional>
#include <type_traits>
#include <cassert>
#include "test_macros.h"
int main()
{
typedef std::plus<int> F;
const F f = F();
static_assert((std::is_same<int, F::first_argument_type>::value), "" );
static_assert((std::is_same<int, F::second_argument_type>::value), "" );
static_assert((std::is_same<int, F::result_type>::value), "" );
assert(f(3, 2) == 5);
#if TEST_STD_VER > 11
typedef std::plus<> F2;
const F2 f2 = F2();
assert(f2(3,2) == 5);
assert(f2(3.0, 2) == 5);
assert(f2(3, 2.5) == 5.5);
constexpr int foo = std::plus<int> () (3, 2);
static_assert ( foo == 5, "" );
constexpr double bar = std::plus<> () (3.0, 2);
static_assert ( bar == 5.0, "" );
#endif
}