rocm_jax/docs/jaxpr.rst

470 lines
18 KiB
ReStructuredText
Raw Normal View History

Understanding Jaxprs
====================
Updated: May 3, 2020 (for commit f1a46fe).
Conceptually, one can think of JAX transformations as first tracing the Python
function to be transformed into a small and well-behaved intermediate form,
the jaxpr, that is then transformed accordingly, and ultimately compiled and executed.
One of the reasons JAX can pack so much power into such a small software package
is that it starts with a familiar and flexible programming interface (Python with NumPy)
and it uses the actual Python interpreter to do most of the heavy lifting to distill the
essence of the computation into a simple statically-typed expression language
with limited higher-order features: the jaxpr language.
Not all Python programs can be processed this way, but it turns out that many
scientific computing and machine learning programs do have this property.
Before we proceed, it is important to point out that not all JAX transformations
materialize a jaxpr as described above; some, e.g., differentiation,
will apply transformations incrementally during tracing.
Nevertheless, if one wants to understand how JAX works internally, or to
make use of the result of JAX tracing, it is useful to understand jaxpr.
A jaxpr instance represents a function with one or more typed parameters (input variables)
and one or more typed results. The results depend only on the input
variables; there are no free variables captured from enclosing scopes.
The inputs and outputs have types, which in JAX are represented as abstract
values. There are two related representations in the code for jaxprs. The main
one is :py:class:`jax.core.TypedJaxpr` and is what you obtain when you
use :py:func:`jax.make_jaxpr` to inspect jaxprs. It has the following
fields:
* ``jaxpr``: is the actual computation content of the actual function (described below).
* ``literals`` is a list of constants. For various reasons, during tracing JAX
will collect the non-scalar constants that arise and will replace them with
variables, e.g., constants that appear in the Python program, or the result of
constant folding such constants. The variables that stand for these constants
are mentioned separately in the enclosed ``jaxpr``.
When applying a ``TypedJaxpr`` to some actual
arguments, one must pass first the ``literals`` followed by the actual arguments.
* ``in_avals`` and ``out_avals`` are the types of the input variables
(excluding the ones that correspond to the ``literals``), and of the output values.
These types are called in JAX abstract values, e.g., ``ShapedArray(float32[10,10])``.
The most interesting part of the TypedJaxpr is the actual execution content,
represented as a :py:class:`jax.core.Jaxpr` as printed using the following
grammar::
jaxpr ::= { lambda Var* ; Var+.
let Eqn*
in [Expr+] }
where:
* The parameter of the jaxpr are shown as two lists of variables separated by
``;``. The first set of variables are the ones that have been introduced
to stand for constants that have been hoisted out. These are called the
`constvars`. The second list of variables are the real input variables.
* ``Eqn*`` is a list of equations, defining intermediate variables referring to
intermediate expressions. Each equation defines one or more variables as the
result of applying a primitive on some atomic expressions. Each equation uses only
input variables and intermediate variables defined by previous equations.
* ``Expr+``: is a list of output atomic expressions for the jaxpr.
Equations are printed as follows::
Eqn ::= let Var+ = Primitive [ Param* ] Expr+
where:
2020-09-10 11:23:29 -07:00
* ``Var+`` are one or more intermediate variables to be defined as the
output of a primitive invocation (some primitives can return multiple values)
* ``Expr+`` are one or more atomic expressions, each either a variable or a
literal constant. A special form of an atomic expression is the `unit`
expression, printed as ``*`` and standing for a value that is not needed
in the rest of the computation and has been elided.
* ``Param*`` are zero or more named parameters to the primitive, printed in
square brackets. Each parameter is shown as ``Name = Value``.
Most jaxpr primitives are first-order (they take just one or more Expr as arguments)::
Primitive := add | sub | sin | mul | ...
The jaxpr primitives are documented in the :py:mod:`jax.lax` module.
For example, here is the jaxpr produced for the function ``func1`` below
>>> from jax import make_jaxpr
>>> import jax.numpy as jnp
>>> def func1(first, second):
... temp = first + jnp.sin(second) * 3.
... return jnp.sum(temp)
...
>>> print(make_jaxpr(func1)(jnp.zeros(8), jnp.ones(8)))
{ lambda ; a b.
let c = sin b
d = mul c 3.0
e = add a d
f = reduce_sum[ axes=(0,) ] e
in (f,) }
Here there are no constvars, ``a`` and ``b`` are the input variables
and they correspond respectively to
``first`` and ``second`` function parameters. The scalar literal ``3.0`` is kept
inline.
The ``reduce_sum`` primitive has named parameters ``axes`` and ``input_shape``, in
addition to the operand ``e``.
Note that JAX traces through Python-level control-flow and higher-order functions
when it extracts the jaxpr. This means that just because a Python program contains
functions and control-flow, the resulting jaxpr does not have
to contain control-flow or higher-order features.
For example, when tracing the function ``func3`` JAX will inline the call to
``inner`` and the conditional ``if second.shape[0] > 4``, and will produce the same
jaxpr as before
>>> def func2(inner, first, second):
... temp = first + inner(second) * 3.
... return jnp.sum(temp)
...
>>> def inner(second):
... if second.shape[0] > 4:
... return jnp.sin(second)
... else:
... assert False
...
>>> def func3(first, second):
... return func2(inner, first, second)
...
>>> print(make_jaxpr(func3)(jnp.zeros(8), jnp.ones(8)))
{ lambda ; a b.
let c = sin b
d = mul c 3.0
e = add a d
f = reduce_sum[ axes=(0,) ] e
in (f,) }
Handling PyTrees
----------------
In jaxpr there are no tuple types; instead primitives take multiple inputs
and produce multiple outputs. When processing a function that has structured
inputs or outputs, JAX will flatten those and in jaxpr they will appear as lists
of inputs and outputs. For more details, please see the documentation for
PyTrees (:doc:`notebooks/JAX_pytrees`).
For example, the following code produces an identical jaxpr to what we saw
before (with two input vars, one for each element of the input tuple)
>>> def func4(arg): # Arg is a pair
... temp = arg[0] + jnp.sin(arg[1]) * 3.
... return jnp.sum(temp)
...
>>> print(make_jaxpr(func4)((jnp.zeros(8), jnp.ones(8))))
{ lambda ; a b.
let c = sin b
d = mul c 3.0
e = add a d
f = reduce_sum[ axes=(0,) ] e
in (f,) }
Constant Vars
2020-09-15 08:06:46 -07:00
-------------
2020-09-15 08:06:46 -07:00
Some values in jaxprs are constants, in that their value does not depend on the
jaxpr's arguments. When these values are scalars they are represented directly
in the jaxpr equations; non-scalar array constants are instead hoisted out to
the top-level jaxpr, where they correspond to constant variables ("constvars").
These constvars differ from the other jaxpr parameters ("invars") only as a
bookkeeping convention.
Higher-order primitives
-----------------------
jaxpr includes several higher-order primitives. They are more complicated because
they include sub-jaxprs.
Conditionals
^^^^^^^^^^^^
JAX traces through normal Python conditionals. To capture a
conditional expression for dynamic execution, one must use the
:py:func:`jax.lax.switch` and :py:func:`jax.lax.cond` constructors,
which have the signatures::
lax.switch(index: int, branches: Sequence[A -> B], operand: A) -> B
lax.cond(pred: bool, true_body: A -> B, false_body: A -> B, operand: A) -> B
Both of these will bind a primitive called ``cond`` internally. The
``cond`` primitive in jaxprs reflects the more general signature of
:py:func:`lax.switch`: it takes an integer denoting the index of the branch
to execute (clamped into valid indexing range).
For example:
>>> from jax import lax
>>>
>>> def one_of_three(index, arg):
... return lax.switch(index, [lambda x: x + 1.,
... lambda x: x - 2.,
... lambda x: x + 3.],
... arg)
...
>>> print(make_jaxpr(one_of_three)(1, 5.))
{ lambda ; a b.
let c = clamp 0 a 2
d = cond[ branches=( { lambda ; a.
let b = add a 1.0
in (b,) }
{ lambda ; a.
let b = sub a 2.0
in (b,) }
{ lambda ; a.
let b = add a 3.0
in (b,) } )
linear=(False,) ] c b
in (d,) }
The cond primitive has a number of parameters:
* `branches` are jaxprs that correspond to the branch
functionals. In this example, those functionals each take one
input variable, corresponding to ``x``.
* `linear` is a tuple of booleans that is used internally by the
auto-differentiation machinery to encode which of the input
parameters are used linearly in the conditional.
The above instance of the cond primitive takes two operands. The first
one (``c``) is the branch index, then ``b`` is the operand (``arg``) to
be passed to whichever jaxpr in ``branches`` is selected by the branch
index.
Another example, using :py:func:`lax.cond`:
>>> from jax import lax
>>>
>>> def func7(arg):
... return lax.cond(arg >= 0.,
... lambda xtrue: xtrue + 3.,
... lambda xfalse: xfalse - 3.,
... arg)
...
>>> print(make_jaxpr(func7)(5.))
{ lambda ; a.
let b = ge a 0.0
c = convert_element_type[ new_dtype=int32
old_dtype=bool ] b
d = cond[ branches=( { lambda ; a.
let b = sub a 3.0
in (b,) }
{ lambda ; a.
let b = add a 3.0
in (b,) } )
linear=(False,) ] c a
in (d,) }
In this case, the boolean predicate is converted to an integer index
(0 or 1), and ``branches`` are jaxprs that correspond to the false and
true branch functionals, in that order. Again, each functional takes
one input variable, corresponding to ``xtrue`` and ``xfalse``
respectively.
The following example shows a more complicated situation when the input
to the branch functionals is a tuple, and the `false` branch functional
contains a constant ``jnp.ones(1)`` that is hoisted as a `constvar`
>>> def func8(arg1, arg2): # arg2 is a pair
... return lax.cond(arg1 >= 0.,
... lambda xtrue: xtrue[0],
2020-09-15 08:06:46 -07:00
... lambda xfalse: jnp.array([1]) + xfalse[1],
... arg2)
...
>>> print(make_jaxpr(func8)(5., (jnp.zeros(1), 2.)))
2020-09-15 08:06:46 -07:00
{ lambda a ; b c d.
let e = ge b 0.0
f = convert_element_type[ new_dtype=int32
old_dtype=bool ] e
g = cond[ branches=( { lambda ; a b c.
let d = convert_element_type[ new_dtype=float32
old_dtype=int32 ] a
e = add d c
in (e,) }
{ lambda ; f_ a b.
let
in (a,) } )
2020-09-15 08:06:46 -07:00
linear=(False, False, False) ] f a c d
in (g,) }
While
^^^^^
Just like for conditionals, Python loops are inlined during tracing.
If you want to capture a loop for dynamic execution, you must use one of several
special operations, :py:func:`jax.lax.while_loop` (a primitive)
and :py:func:`jax.lax.fori_loop`
(a helper that generates a while_loop primitive)::
lax.while_loop(cond_fun: (C -> bool), body_fun: (C -> C), init: C) -> C
lax.fori_loop(start: int, end: int, body: (int -> C -> C), init: C) -> C
In the above signature, “C” stands for the type of a the loop “carry” value.
For example, here is an example fori loop
>>> import numpy as np
>>>
>>> def func10(arg, n):
... ones = jnp.ones(arg.shape) # A constant
... return lax.fori_loop(0, n,
... lambda i, carry: carry + ones * 3. + arg,
... arg + ones)
...
>>> print(make_jaxpr(func10)(np.ones(16), 5))
2020-09-15 08:06:46 -07:00
{ lambda ; a b.
let c = broadcast_in_dim[ broadcast_dimensions=( )
shape=(16,) ] 1.0
d = add a c
_ _ e = while[ body_jaxpr={ lambda ; a b c d e.
let f = add c 1
g = mul a 3.0
h = add e g
i = add h b
in (f, d, i) }
body_nconsts=2
cond_jaxpr={ lambda ; a b c.
let d = lt a b
in (d,) }
2020-09-15 08:06:46 -07:00
cond_nconsts=0 ] c a 0 b d
in (e,) }
The while primitive takes 5 arguments: ``c a 0 b e``, as follows:
* 0 constants for ``cond_jaxpr`` (since ``cond_nconsts`` is 0)
* 2 constants for ``body_jaxpr`` (``c``, and ``a``)
* 3 parameters for the initial value of carry
Scan
^^^^
JAX supports a special form of loop over the elements of an array (with
statically known shape). The fact that there are a fixed number of iterations
2020-09-15 08:06:46 -07:00
makes this form of looping easily reverse-differentiable. Such loops are
constructed with the :py:func:`jax.lax.scan` function::
lax.scan(body_fun: (C -> A -> (C, B)), init_carry: C, in_arr: Array[A]) -> (C, Array[B])
2020-09-15 08:06:46 -07:00
Here ``C`` is the type of the scan carry, ``A`` is the element type of the
input array(s), and ``B`` is the element type of the output array(s).
For the example consider the function ``func11`` below
>>> def func11(arr, extra):
... ones = jnp.ones(arr.shape) # A constant
... def body(carry, aelems):
... # carry: running dot-product of the two arrays
... # aelems: a pair with corresponding elements from the two arrays
... ae1, ae2 = aelems
... return (carry + ae1 * ae2 + extra, carry)
... return lax.scan(body, 0., (arr, ones))
...
>>> print(make_jaxpr(func11)(np.ones(16), 5.))
2020-09-15 08:06:46 -07:00
{ lambda ; a b.
let c = broadcast_in_dim[ broadcast_dimensions=( )
shape=(16,) ] 1.0
d e = scan[ jaxpr={ lambda ; a b c d.
let e = mul c d
f = add b e
g = add f a
in (g, b) }
length=16
linear=(False, False, False, False)
num_carry=1
num_consts=1
reverse=False
unroll=1 ] b 0.0 a c
in (d, e) }
The ``linear`` parameter describes for each of the input variables whether they
are guaranteed to be used linearly in the body. Once the scan goes through
linearization, more arguments will be linear.
The scan primitive takes 4 arguments: ``b 0.0 a c``, of which:
* one is the free variable for the body
* one is the initial value of the carry
* The next 2 are the arrays over which the scan operates.
XLA_call
^^^^^^^^
The call primitive arises from JIT compilation, and it encapsulates
a sub-jaxpr along with parameters the specify the backend and the device the
computation should run. For example
>>> from jax import jit
>>>
>>> def func12(arg):
... @jit
... def inner(x):
... return x + arg * jnp.ones(1) # Include a constant in the inner function
... return arg + inner(arg - 2.)
...
>>> print(make_jaxpr(func12)(1.))
2020-09-15 08:06:46 -07:00
{ lambda ; a.
let b = sub a 2.0
c = xla_call[ backend=None
call_jaxpr={ lambda ; a b.
let c = broadcast_in_dim[ broadcast_dimensions=( )
shape=(1,) ] 1.0
d = mul a c
e = add b d
in (e,) }
device=None
2020-09-15 08:06:46 -07:00
donated_invars=(False, False)
name=inner ] a b
d = add a c
in (d,) }
XLA_pmap
^^^^^^^^
2020-09-15 08:06:46 -07:00
If you use the :py:func:`jax.pmap` transformation, the function to be mapped is
captured using the ``xla_pmap`` primitive. Consider this example
>>> from jax import pmap
>>>
>>> def func13(arr, extra):
... def inner(x):
... # use a free variable "extra" and a constant jnp.ones(1)
... return (x + extra + jnp.ones(1)) / lax.psum(x, axis_name='rows')
... return pmap(inner, axis_name='rows')(arr)
...
>>> print(make_jaxpr(func13)(jnp.ones((1, 3)), 5.))
2020-09-15 08:06:46 -07:00
{ lambda ; a b.
let c = xla_pmap[ axis_name=rows
axis_size=1
backend=None
2020-09-15 08:06:46 -07:00
call_jaxpr={ lambda ; a b.
let c = add b a
d = broadcast_in_dim[ broadcast_dimensions=( )
shape=(1,) ] 1.0
e = add c d
f = psum[ axis_index_groups=None
2020-09-15 08:06:46 -07:00
axis_name=rows ] b
g = div e f
in (g,) }
devices=None
2020-09-15 08:06:46 -07:00
donated_invars=(False, False)
global_axis_size=None
2020-09-15 08:06:46 -07:00
mapped_invars=(False, True)
name=inner ] b a
in (c,) }
The ``xla_pmap`` primitive specifies the name of the axis (parameter ``rows``)
2020-09-15 08:06:46 -07:00
and the body of the function to be mapped as the ``call_jaxpr`` parameter.
value of this parameter is a Jaxpr with 3 input variables:
The parameter ``mapped_invars`` specify which of the input variables should be
mapped and which should be broadcast. In our example, the value of ``extra``
is broadcast, the other input values are mapped.